# Recording Psychotronic Voices

Date: January 1 1998
From: Eleanor White
eleanor@raven1.net

> Hi all -

> We have heard tell of at least one victim who has successfully recorded the incoming 'voices' transmissions on her note-taker tape recorder. She claimed the make of the recorder had to be the same, and due to crashes here, I've lost the reference.

> But, based on the experiences of a friendly radar technician who, in boyhood, was able to "hear" incoming radar signals from ships on the Great Lakes using a tin-can "crystal set", I think for those e-weapons victims who get a lot of voice-to-skull transmissions over substantial periods of time, this method can be adapted to detection of those transmissions.

> Most tape recorders have an external microphone input. If a (typically) 1/8" mono microphone plug is pushed in, you have it's center conductor tapped directly to the "hot" input lead.

> Recorders will often allow you to also push in a pair of stereo headphones on an external headset jack and often this allows monitoring of what you Are recording, as it happens. Very handy.

> For a first try by those without much electronic experience, you might simply connect a random length wire to the center conductor only, to see if such an antenna gives your recorder just enough sensitivity to trap those 'voices'.

> Try different wire lengths and orientations. Even though microwaves are short, a very long wire can still assist in reception by supporting multiple wavelengths. A long wire can be pruned or bent back along itself at it's farthest end, because sometimes a reception sensitivity boost can occur by having a "standing wave node" right at your recorder's end.

> While soldering to the small tab for the center conductor inside the 1/8" mono plug is best, as long as a small stripped end is clean copper wire and it does not accidentally short against the larger ground (outside) conductor, this test setup will work OK. Such a wire junction need only carry the tiniest current to work.

> If you are not technically inclined, many Radio Shack sales personnel are experienced enough to get you headed in the right direction, even though they will be puzzled at your request. (Hand 'em one of our 'Ban Electronic Weapons' buttons - ideal time to do that.) Ditto for any local radio/TV repair shop or ham radio operator.

> Now - that's a first try. A better result may be obtained by making this setup into a primitive crystal set, inserting a diode between the 1/8" mono plug's center conductor and the wire. The best type of diode is the "hot carrier" diode, although a diode from a Radio Shack parts rack which says it's a "Schottky" diode will probably work well enough.

> Any "small signal" diode may work also - if you have a choice, shop for one with the smallest "forward voltage" or "forward breakover voltage" as that will be more sensitive.

> Most diodes have an end with a marking "band" at one end. It is worth trying the diode in both directions, band-towards-recorder or band-towards-antenna (though most technicians would probably instinctively place the banded end towards the recorder.)

> mounting the diode between the 1/8" mono plug's center conductor tab and the wire is a bit of a mechanical problem, because the wire's leverage on the tiny connection will guarantee it's breaking off without too much abuse.

> The way to handle this is to run a bit of cotton or nylon twine from the solder hole in the ground's connector inside the 1/8" mono plug out to connect to the wire in some way so the twine takes most of the mechanical strain, and the diode has little strain on it.

> Since this is an experimental setup which may not work, it probably isn't worth designing a mechanical masterpiece. However, Radio Shack heat shrink tubing can help a great deal, both in insulating the diode's bare leads from touching the 1/8" mono plug's grounded parts, and if a couple of inches is used, it can also form a good, tight anchorage of the twine on to the wire.

> The diode leads and wire closest to the 1/8" mono plug should not be under tension when you are ready to test.

> ** All this is a lot of words, especially for someone not used to assembling electronic parts, so if it is totally confusing, print out this email and ask a local techincally experienced person to interpret it.

> If, after you are certain the diode has been tried both ways during your own reception of voices from your spooks, and nothing was shorted, you will likely have to accept that a different transmission mode is in use at your location than at the places successful recordings have been made.

> (If a victim who has made a successful recording is reading this, I'd love to have a copy of your tape and I will gladly reimburse you for all costs.)

> Finally - even though this is about a technical topic, I'd like to say again to all recipients that due to the urgent need for publicity work, I'd rather not take time responding to technical questions. I'm not all that interested in how the damn technology works - all I want to do is get it exposed to the general public.

> Many fine folks write me with all sorts of questions and information, and sadly, due to my chronic fatigue syndrome and the urgency of our publicity work, I have to send terse replies and in some instances no replies. Apologies in advance if this happens to any reader of this note.

> The fact is that we can't hope to 'fight' a technological battle with sick but extremely bright people who have worked endlessly for the past 50 years with unlimited black budgets.

> The fact, too, is that we don't ever need to know how the spooks' technology works. The spooks do so much in their "total immersion" harassment programs to us that we can expose them through publicity efforts alone.

> Two years ago, my fine boss and his VP operations thought I was ready for the looney bin. But, now, less than a month ago, after a particularly intense week of remote electronic disruption (and destruction) of portions of our company computer system, these two guys came to me and asked for the best way to install shielding. that is a major turnaround, and demonstrates very clearly that with constant publicity efforts, the spooks will expose themselves!!

> (At the beginning of World War II, Pres. Roosevelt had a serious problem with US isolationists demanding the US not go to war. Know how he solved it? He had the Nazi's own internal propaganda films shown in movie houses. The Nazi propaganda people, then, were ultimately responsible for the US joining the war in Europe and their own defeat. We are in a similar situation right now.)

> Good luck to others who may try this antenna method. I haven't been able to thus far, because my own spooks use voice to skull in very short bursts, and in situations (like being half awake) where I can't get a recorder going handily.

> Eleanor White