### The following excerpted from
“The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects”
by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt,
who was the former head of the Air Force ‘Project Blue Book’

> Shortly after dark on August 12, 1953, the Air Defense Command radar station at Ellsworth AFB – just east of Rapid City, South Dakota – had received a call from the local Ground Observer Corps filter center. A lady spotter at Black Hawk, about 10 miles west of Ellsworth, had reported an extremely bright light low on the horizon off to the northeast. The radar had been scanning an area to the west, working a jet fighter in some practice patrols; but when the got the report, they moved the sector scan to the northeast quadrant.There was a target exactly where the lady reported the light to be. The warrant officer, who was the duty controller for the night, told me he’d studied the target for several minutes.He knew how weather could affect radar but this target was “well defined, solid, and bright.” It seemed to be moving, but very slowly.He called for an altitude reading, and the man on the height-finding radar checked his scope. He also had the target – it was at 16,000 feet.

> The warrant officer picked up the phone and asked the filter center to connect him with the spotter. They did, and the two people compared notes on the UFO’s position for several minutes. But right in the middle of a sentence the lady suddenly stopped and excitedly said, “It’s starting to move – it’s moving southwest toward Rapid.”The controller looked down at his scope and the target was beginning to pick up speed and move southwest.He yelled at two of his men to run outside and take a look.In a second-or-two one of them shouted back that they could both see a large bluish-white light moving toward Rapid City. The controller looked down at his scope – the target was moving toward Rapid City.As all three parties watched the light and kept up a steady cross conversation of the description, the UFO swiftly made a wide sweep around Rapid City and returned to its original position in the sky.A master sergeant who had seen and heard the happenings told me that in all his years of duty – combat radar operations in both Europe and Korea – he’d never been so completely awed by anything. When the warrant officer had yelled down at him and asked him what he thought they should do, he’d just stood there. “After all,” he told me, “what in hell could we do – they’re bigger than all of us.”

> But the warrant officer DID do something. He called to the F-84 pilot he had on combat air patrol west of the base and told him to get ready for an intercept. He brought the pilot around south of the base and gave him a course correction that would take him right into the light, which was still at 16,000 feet.By this time the pilot had it spotted.He made the turn, and when he closed to within about 3 miles of the target it began to move.The controller saw it begin to move, the spotter saw it being to move, and the pilot saw it begin to move – all at the same time.There was now no doubt that all of them were watching the same object.

> Once it began to move, the UFO picked up speed fast and started to climb, heading north, but the F-84 was right on its tail. The pilot would notice that the light was getting brighter, and he’d call the controller to tell him about it. But the controller’s answer would always be the same, “Roger, we can see it on the scope.” There was always a limit as to how near the jet could get, however.The controller told me that it was just as if the UFO had some kind of an automatic warning radar linked to its power supply.When something got too close to it, it would automatically pick up speed and pull away. The separation distance always remained about 3 miles.

> The chase continued on north – out-of-sight of the lights of Rapid City and the base – into some very black night. When the UFO and the F-84 got about 120 miles to the north, the pilot checked his fuel. He had to come back.And when I talked to him, he said he was damn glad that he was running our-of-fuel because being out over some might desolate country along with a UFO can cause some worry.Both the UFO and the F-84 had gone off the scope.But in a few minutes the jet was back on, heading for home. Then 10 or 15 miles behind it was the UFO target also coming back.

> While the UFO and the F-84 were returning to the base – the F-84 was planning to land – the controller received a call from the jet interceptor squadron on the base. The alert pilots at the squadron had heard the conversations on their radio and didn’t believe it.“Who’s nuts up there?” was the comment that passed over the wire from the pilots to the radar people.There was a F-84 on the line ready-to-scramble, the man on the phone said, and one of the pilots – a World War II and Korean veteran – wanted to go up and see a flying saucer.The controller said, “OK, go!”

> In a minute-or-two the F-84 was airborne and the controller was working him toward the light. The pilot saw it right away and closed in. Again the light began to climb out, this time more toward the northeast.The pilot also began to climb; and before long, the light – which at first had been about 30 degrees above his horizontal line-of-sight – was not below him. He nosed the ’84 down to pick up speed, but it was the same old story.As soon as he’d get to within 3 miles of the UFO, it would put on a burst of speed and stay out ahead.

> Even though the pilot could see the light and hear the ground controller telling him that he was above it, and alternatively gaining on it or dropping back, he still couldn’t believe it – there must be a simple explanation.He turned off all his lights – but it wasn’t a reflection from any of the airplane’s lights because there it was.A reflection from a ground light, maybe.He rolled the airplane – the position of the light didn’t change. A star – he picked out three bright starts near the light and watched carefully.The UFO moved in relation to the 3 stars.Well, he thought to himself, if it’s a real object out there, my radar should pick it up too.So he flipped on his radar-ranging gun sight.In a few seconds the red light on his sight blinked on – something REAL and SOLID was in front of him!Then he was scared. When I talked to him, he readily admitted that he’d been scared.He’d met MD 109’s, FW 190’s, and ME 262’s over Germany and he’d met MIG-15’s over Korea.But the large, bright, bluish-white light had scared him – he asked the controller if he could break off the intercept.

> This time the light didn’t come back. When the UFO went off the scope it was headed toward Fargo, North Dakota, so the controller called the Fargo filter center.Had they any reports of unidentified lights? He asked.They hadn’t.But in a few minutes a call came back.Spotter posts on a southwest-northeast line a few miles west of Fargo had reported a fast-moving, bright bluish-white light.

> This was an unknown – the best ………………………………….

> The following were excerpted from “The UFO Cover-up” (formerly published as “Clear Intent”), by Lawrence Fawcett and Barry Greenwood …

> 1. On October 27, 1975 security personnel assigned to the 42nd Security Police Squadron, Loring Air Force Base, Maine, were on duty in the munitions storage area, positioned on the northern perimeter of the flight line.Nuclear weapons were stored there in igloo-type huts covered with dirt to camouflage them from aircraft flying in the air corridors above. The dump is more than a half-mile long and is surround by a 12-foot-high chain-link fence with barbed wire on top. The area in-and-around the dump is patrolled day and night by the 42nd Police with K-9 patrols and manned vehicles.It is a highly restrictive location, both on the ground and in the air.

> At 7:45pm Staff Sgt. Danny Lewis of the 42nd police was on duty at the dump when he spotted what he thought was an aircraft flying at low altitude along the northern perimeter of Loring. Lewis watched the unknown aircraft penetrate the perimeter at an altitude of approximately 300 feet. At about the same time Staff Sgt. James Sampley of the 219th Communications Squadron was on duty in the control tower and observed the unknown aircraft on the tower radar screen. Its position was 10-to-13 miles east-northeast of the base.Numerous attempts were made to radio the aircraft for identification and to advise it that it was entering a restricted area over the base. The unknown aircraft began to circle, and at one point came to within 300 yards of the nuclear storage area at an altitude of 150 feet. Lewis notified the Command Post of the 42nd Bomb Wing that an unknown aircraft had penetrated the base and was within 300 yards of the weapons area.The commander of the 42nd Bomb Wing implemented a Security Option 3 alert, which brought the base up to major alert status. Radar showed the unknown to be circling the base for 40 minutes when suddenly it disappeared from the screen. Either the object had landed or it had dropped below the radar coverage.

> The Wing Commander arrived at the weapons storage area.Immediately other units of the 42nd Police began pouring into the area. Through the Loring Command Post, the Wing Commander requested fighter coverage from the 21st NORAD Region at Hancock Field, New York, and the 22nd NORA Region at North Bay, Ontario, Canada. However, fighter support was denied by both regions.The unknown broke the circling pattern and began flying toward Grand Falls, New Brunswick, Canada.No further unusual events occurred throughout that night although the base remained on a high state of alert into the early morning hours of October 28.

> At 7:45pm on October 28, Sgt. Clifton Blakeslee and Staff Sgt. William Long, both assigned to the 42nd Security Police Squadron, were on duty at the munitions storage area. Along with Sgt. Danny Lewis, they spotted what appeared to be the running lights of an aircraft approaching the base from the north at 3,000 feet. It did not come closer to Loring than 3 miles at this time, and it was observed intermittently for the next hour. On first spotting the craft, Sgt. Lewis called the Command Post and advised it that the unknown craft had returned to Loring.Once again, the Commander, 42nd Bomb Wing responded.He reported seeing a flashing white light and amber-colored light on the object. The speed and movement in-the-air suggested it was a helicopter.From 7:45 to 8:20 it was under constant observation, both visually by the personnel in the storage area and electronically by the control tower radar. The unknown craft would appear and disappear from view.And at one point appeared over the end of the runway at an altitude of 150 feet. The object subsequently shut off its lights and reappeared over the weapons storage area, maintaining an altitude of 150 feet.

> At this time Sgt. Steven Eichner, a crew chief on a B-52 bomber, was working out of a launch truck with Sgt. R. Jones and other members of the crew.Jones spotted a read and orange object over the flight line. It seemed to be on the other side of the flight line from where the weapons storage was located.To Eichner and Jones, the object looked like a stretched-out football. It hovered in midair as everyone in the crew stared in awe.As the watched, the object put out its lights and disappeared. But it soon reappeared again over the north end of the runway, moving in jerky motions.It stopped and hovered.Eichner and the rest of the crew jumped into the truck and started to drive toward the object. Proceeding down Oklahoma Avenue (which borders the runway), they turned left onto the road that led to the weapons storage area.As they made the turn, they spotted the object about 300 feet in front of them. It seemed to be about 5 feet in-the-air and hovered without movement or noise. Exhibiting a reddish-orange color, the object was about 4 car lengths long.Eichner described what he saw next:The object looked like all the colors were blending together, as if you were looking at a desert scene. You see waves of heat rising off the desert floor.This is what I saw. There were these waves in front of the object and all the colors were blending together. The object was solid and we could not hear any noise coming from it.

> They could not see any doors or windows on the object nor any propellers or engines which would keep the object in the air.Suddenly the base came alive. Sirens began screaming. Eichner could see numerous blue lights on police vehicles coming down the flight line and runway toward the weapons storage area at high speed.Jones turned and said to the crew, “We better get out of here!” The Security Police did not try to stop them.Their interest was in the object over the storage dump, not in the truck which was in a restricted area. The object shut off its lights and disappeared, not to be seen again that night. The 42nd Police conducted a security sweep of the weapons storage area inside-and-out with no results. Radar had once again briefly tracked the object heading for Grand Falls, New Brunswick, finally losing the unknown at Grand Falls itself.

> 2. There are more than 2,000 missile sites spread across the United States. At Malmstrom Air Force base in Montana, there are 20 launch Control Facilities (LCF) housing Minuteman missiles underground. The Minuteman sites are alphabetically codes, such as “L-1”, “K-1”, “E-1”, and the like, and are distributed over a wide area.One of those sites – K-7 – is located in the Judith Gap region just south of Lewiston, Montana and was the scene of an event which caused a major stir for the U.S. Air Force.

> On November 7, 1975 remote electronic sensors triggered an alarm indicating that something was violating site security. Underground in the launch control area, two officers noted the signal, but there was no television surveillance topside.The normal procedure for detecting what had violated security was to call for a missile security helicopter to check the area.At the same time, Sabotage Alert Teams (SAT) consisting of 4-to-6 men were also alerted to the fact that a violation was taking place and were ordered to proceed to the site.

> On this occasion a SAT team drove down the highway and onto a dirt road which led to the K-7 are. About a mile away the team could see an orange, glowing object over the area.As they closed to within half-a-mile, they could now see the object was tremendous in size. They radioed to the launch Control Facility that, from their location, they were viewing a brightly glowing, orange, football-field sized disc that illuminated the missile site. The SAT team was ordered by the launch control people to proceed into the K-7 site. However they responded that they refused to go any farther, clearly fearful of the intimidating appearance of the object. It began to rise, and at about 1,000 feet NORAD picked up the UFO on radar.

> Two F-106 jet interceptors were launched from Great Falls, Montana and headed toward the K-7 area. The UFO continued to rise.At about 200,000 feet it disappeared from NORAD’s radar. The F-106’s were never able to get a visual sighting of the UFO.All members of the SAT team were directed to the base hospital where they were psychologically tested. It was determined that no one could identify the object that was seen, but that the members of the SAT team obviously had been through a traumatic experience.

> Meanwhile targeting teams along with computer specialists were brought to the missile site to check out the missile and, specifically, the computer in the warhead that targets the missile. Amazingly when the computer was checked, they found that the tape had mysteriously changed target numbers! The re-entry vehicle was then taken from the silo and brought back to the base. Eventually the entire missile was changed. Coincidentally there is an Air Force term used to describe an incident in which a nuclear device is tampered with. This term is “Faded Giant”, a phrase which very appropriately describes the K-7 report.

> This was not the first time that such an incident had occurred at Malmstrom.In the early spring of 1966, two officers had relieved an earlier shift in the underground launch control area for the evening.As they ran through the routine of monitoring the missile facility’s instruments, alarms began to go off.It seems that all of the 10 missiles at their location had simultaneously developed a problem.A quick check with each launching site indicated that none of the missiles could be launched due to a fault in all of their guidance and control systems. This is an unusual problem because the guidance system is the most protected portion of a Minuteman missile.Personnel above ground had indicated that at the same time the problem developed, UFOs were seen in the area.Another similar event, during the week of March 20, 1967, disturbed officials at Malmstrom. Again a flight of 10 missiles developed problems.A UFO was in the area and was confirmed on radar.Jet fighters were sent after the UFO, but the results of the pursuit are not known. Later inquiries to obtain additional information were met with silence.

> Public inquiries even many years later were consistently met with the same Air Force response: “All documentation at Malmstrom AFB has been destroyed in accordance with Air Force directives for the dates of the UFO sightings mentioned …”Since when are all records of a serious incident or series of incidents of this magnitude destroyed?We must conclude that either there is gross incompetence in the military’s handling of such situations. Or that the UFOs in these instances presented so considerable a threat to the national security of the United States that the Air Force felt compelled to deliberately misinform the public and – as a result – violated the Freedom of Information Act by stating that existing records had been destroyed.

> 3. On November 11, 1975 a B-52 bomber was flying over Freeze Out lake in Montana, simulating bomb runs over missile sites by flying low and opening the bomb bay doors. A Montana Fish and Game Department employee saw a light flying directly behind the bomber.Using his riflescope to get a better look, he noted that the strange object seemed to be pacing the aircraft.It then briefly attached itself to the bomber, detached itself, and climbed out of sight. He reported this sighting to Sheriff Pete Howard of Choteau County.Howard conducted follow-up interviews with military personnel and learned that as the object attached itself to the B-52, the plane’s radar equipment went out! The Air Force has denied any knowledge of this report.

> 4. This report came from a friend of a witness involved in a tragic UFO chase incident.Unfortunately the witness died in Vietnam during the war, so little more information can be obtained:

> “The incident happened sometime around 1969. He was a radar tracking airman located someplace in North Carolina and the situation involved a series of UFO reports over the Atomic Energy Commission research facility down at Oak Ridge. On the final date of the incidents which I … obviously, it was so long ago, I can only give you approximate times – it was sometime in October.”

> “The Air Force scrambled two F-4 Phantoms, one with wing cameras and one equipped with air-to-air missiles. The F-4s got to within about 5 miles when the two unidentified objects took off at a fairly high rate-of-speed and outdistanced them by about 60 miles in less than about 10 seconds. They stopped a second time. The F-4s continued their chase. They went to afterburners because there was a burst of speed on the radar scope. The next thing that happened was one of the blips from the F-4s completely vanished off the screen. About 10 seconds later, the second F-4 vanished off the screen. At the time, they were about 3 miles of the two UFOs when they finally disappeared.”

> “Okay, now he was told directly not to give out any information about the incident.The base he was stationed at had a paramilitary hospital, and they did find wreckage because he had to give them coordinates approximately where the F-4s went off-the-screen.A lot of material – like the titanium – had been crystallized. Some of the plastic had been shattered. The plane’s parts were scattered over a distance of about 8-to-9 miles. The approximate height when the first one went off-the-screen was about 25,000 feet; and at afterburners if they exploded or whatever the situation was, they would have spread debris all over the place.And this was fairly consistent with what they found.They found both the captain of the aircraft and ordnance office who is the copilot. They found the captain and ordnance officer of the second one.As far as I know, they are still in a military mental institution. They have little or no faculties.”

> “Now he violated the trust in telling a few of his friends and, subsequently, sometime in 1971 was sent to Vietnam. The last thing I had heard was that he had been killed in action someplace near Da Nang near one of the perimeters. Which didn’t make any sense to me at the time because he was a trained radar intercept operator, and there would have been no reason for him to be going into a combat situation. He was part of a special unit in 1969. I’m trying to remember what it was. He had been trained by the NSA, but the group that he was working with specifically had their own special radar set-up.It was probably sponsored by the NSA, but it was a military operation. It was all Air Force personnel except that the only strange thing about it was they didn’t have a colonel in charge of their group. It was somebody from the NSA.”

> 5. One witness bore the remarkable story that follows.A background check verified his former duty status in the Navy. Currently he works for a technical in Connecticut. He expressed concern that would experience with the navy if his identity were revealed so we will honor his request for anonymity.

> Ed Sims (pseudonym) was a member of the United States navy and was assigned to the nuclear submarine USS Abraham Lincoln. According to Sims, the ship was about one day out of the Panama Canal.It was nighttime.There were 4 men – including Sims – on the conning tower, filming night lights and algae in the water. The ship’s photographer was using a 35mm still camera and 16mm movie camera. Suddenly a crimson-colored, 100-foot, circular disc dropped out-of-the-sky and made a wide sweeping arc around the ship at an altitude of about 10 feet.At this point all navigation and sonar were lost on the ship, and the ship was essentially “dead” in the water.The photographer filmed the whole event with both cameras. After the object circled the ship 2 or 3 times, it took off at a high speed and in a matter-of-seconds was gone. As soon as the object disappeared, sonar and navigation came back on.

> All four individuals went down and reported to the executive officer what had taken place topside. The photographer was ordered to develop all films immediately and to present them to the commander.The executive officer warned them not to talk to anybody else aboard the ship about the incident.Sims stated that the photographer later told him that everything came out on the film. Sims claimed that he did not hear anything else about the incident until the ship docked in California.

> After they docked, Sims was about to go on liberty when he and the other witnesses were summoned to the skipper’s room. Once inside, they were greeted by two civilians and one Navy officer and were questioned for about 1-hour about the UFO incident.They were informed that their liberty was canceled, and all four were taken off-the-ship by military police to some unknown location on the base. Once there, the men were put into an 8-by-10-foot room with only a desk and a chair in it.They were left alone for about 1-hour, with no one coming in-or-out. One of the civilians belonging to either the FBI, CIA, or OSI or Navy Intelligence, along with a naval officer, came into the room and interrogations began.They tried to convince Sims that he didn’t see anything on the day in question. When he tried to explain to them that even the ship’s photographer took photos of the object, they began telling him that he was lying and that the 4 men made up the story. Sims stated that this type of interrogation went on for hours.When they could not break Sims’ story, they left him in the room, telling him they would “see him tomorrow”.After about 45-minutes, he was taken under guard to a location on the base where they billeted him for the night, telling him that they pick him up in the morning. The next day 2 military policemen took him to the same 8-by-10-foot room, and he was interrogated for a full 8-hours, this time by different civilian and Navy personnel. Again the whole interrogation was structured around telling Sims that he did not see anything and that he and the other witnesses were lying.

> He was put through the same process the next day, but this time 3 civilians entered the room with an attaché case. The individuals told Sims that they believed his story and were going to show him photos of types of UFOs and wanted him to identify the one that he had seen.Sims stated that al photographs shown to him were 8-by-10 glossies showing different saucer-like objects.Some were cigar-shaped, some were elongated football-shaped, some looked like ice cream cones.Others looked like two headlights on a car.He was able to find one photograph that resembled the object that he saw on the night in question.He was then told to sign a secrecy document which said that if he revealed anything about the sighting or the photos he was shown, that he would be court-martialed, fined, and placed into solitary confinement for a long period of time. Sims signed.He was told to report back to USS Abraham Lincoln, escorted by military police. Once aboard the ship, he was told to report to the commanding officer who informed him that he was being transferred. He was to pack all his belongings and report back when he was ready to leave.He was taken off the ship, placed on an airplane, and flown to his next duty station in Hawaii.Sims heard through acquaintances that the other three individuals were taken off the ship and assigned to other duty stations around the world – never seeing or hearing from the other men again.

> Sims showed no evidence of lying and desired no publicity about experience.One reliable military source within the Air Force had confirmed the portion of the story in which the UFO appeared near the submarine.

> 6. Another 1973 story, given to us by a former member of Naval Intelligence, discusses the recovery of a “crashed” UFO in the Pacific:

> “It basically started when I entered the Navy. I was trained as a gunners mate. And instead of being sent to school as normal recruits would be, I was kept at the Great Lakes Naval Base at a place called the ‘Big Green House’, which is their gunners school. This is located in the Great Lakes Naval Base in Chicago.The reason that they kept me there was that my aptitude tests showed me as being somebody reasonably good and intelligent.I had a very high-ranking score on the intelligence test and the mechanical aptitude test.They wanted to keep me around as an instructor.The theory was that a recruit who was also an instructor could help other recruits become better gunners mates.9 months later Naval Intelligence approached me to go to work for them as a normal gunners mate but to be aware of the things that go on around me and to report any sort of ‘questionable’ activity that I had seen. I was given a ‘triple A’ security clearance at that time and was told that if I kept my nose clean for a period of one-and-a-half years that I would be sent overseas and given a ‘triple five A’ class security clearance.”

> “This one night I was Officer of the Guard. I was given a letter by a messenger that I was supposed to give to the OD (Officer on Duty). It was ‘for his eyes only’ and it was a sealed envelope. I was to get a signed receipt from him. The receipt was on the front of the envelope. To do this, I had to inside.I had to call and tell them what I was doing and the officer was busy at that time. So it was decided that I was to be allowed inside the building to his office, have him sign the receipt, then turn around and walk out.Now this was highly unusual – normally they would come to the door and sign the receipt and I would get inside.But that night, the OD was busy.They let me in through this sliding door, a nice large metal door. I walked inside and was stopped to sign-in. I was escorted down the hallway about 20-feet by three burly SPs.I took a turn to-the-right for about 5-feet, went down another hallway about 8-feet, took a turn to-the-left for about another 5-feet, walked out into a warehousing area where I saw a strange craft off to-my-left.I was told to walk-on, get my signed receipt, turn around, and leave. I was told NOT to pay any attention to what was going on around me.”

> “As I went to the doorway, where the OD was, I saw a very unusual craft over to-my-left. The craft was possibly 30-to-35-feet long, about 12-to-15-feet at its thickest part, then it tapered-off in the front to a teardrop shape. I only caught it at an angular view. It looked like it did not have any seams to it.It had a bluish tint but that was only if you looked at it for a few seconds. If you looked at it and turned your eyes away real quick, al you saw were white lights.It was sitting on a pedestal or frame made out of 4-by-4 wooden blocks. It was help up by crossbeams underneath it and was sitting about a foot-or-two off the floor.At that time, I had turned and walked into the office where the OD was sitting. There were several people in there, nobody was talking, nobody was doing anything – everybody was watching me. They seemed nervous. I laid the envelope on the desk, and did a quarter-of-a-turn to my left so I could not see what was in the envelope. I was scared that I might see something I wasn’t supposed to.”

> “At this time I had a very good view about halfway from the craft to the tail section.The whole craft tapered back to a very high edge. It looked as if it had a razor edge, a razor sharp edge. The bottom went about ¾ the length of the craft and then angled sharply upwards. I was then ordered by the Officer on Duty to take the receipt, which meant I had to turn back around and face him. The envelope had disappeared, and I don’t know where it went. I was told to take my receipt and leave and not to say anything to anyone about what I had seen. I turned around to my left. As I did, I got a full scan of what the craft was, and then I did a very quick about-face and was escorted out. I finished my shift as outside duty officer, and that’s all. I turned the receipt in to the officer of the deck in the morning.I then slept until about 4pm and that was it.”

> “About 2 months later I went to San Diego to put some missiles in a sub.I was talking to one of the guys who were on a destroyer and it seemed as though they had tangled with some unidentified craft. He didn’t know what it was.They brought it down in the Pacific in about 350-feet of water. The reason that nobody could tell if it was a craft or not is that it didn’t look like anything that he had seen before.He sketched it for me. I was in a bar with him at the time and we had a few beers, so I took the story with a grain-of-salt until I saw the sketch of what the craft looked like. It was an exact copy of the same craft I had seen in Chicago.This happened right around the time I was getting out of boot camp, which would have put it around June of 1973 that the craft was shot down.It was brought from San Diego by rail to Chicago, where it was worked on. I think one of the reasons they had to get it out of that area was due to the large amount of publicity that it got. A destroyer does not shoot on an aircraft without drawing some publicity.They shot it down with a surface-to-air missile, according to what the sailor said. They hit the craft but didn’t destroy it.According to him, they didn’t even dent it; but it sent up a concussion through the craft and whatever was inside of it was destroyed or hurt or whatever. I don’t know, he didn’t say.He did say that they were able to pull some sort of life form from out of it.That’s all I heard from him. He did tell me that the Glomar Explorer was used to extract the craft from 350-feet of water. And that the ship was a naval destroyer escort; destination of the vessel was Hawaii at the time of the incident.”

> FOIA inquiries were filed to locate any information on the story, but they proved to be fruitless. The Navy claimed to know nothing about it.One would think that a story like this would be difficult to keep secret. The source stands by his account, however. Is the story true?Or was it merely a test of the witness’s reliability in keeping a sensitive matter secret since he was being primed for a position in intelligence? We include accounts like this in this book in the hope that others will come forward to either confirm or deny that the events took place.

> 7. On June 17, 1974 the Hobart (Australia) Mercury carried the following news item:

> “HUNTSVILLE, Alabama – Experts at an Army missile base say they are puzzled about strange ‘ghost ships’ picked up by powerful radar scanner in the Pacific during a tracking exercise last summer.”

> “There has been little official comment on what the scientists found during the exercise, but Major Dallas Van Hoose, an Army spokesman, confirmed recently that ‘some unexplained aerial phenomena’ were observed during the exercise last August. Scientists, many of whom are reluctant to be named in interviews because of genera public skepticism over unidentified flying objects, say privately they have been unable to find any explanation for the ‘ghost ships’.

> ‘We have never seen anything precisely like this before,’ said one ballistic missile defense expert who works for an Army agency here and who is familiar with the advanced radar used to test missiles and warheads.Huntsville houses the Army’s ballistic missile defense systems command which tests in the Kwajelein Atoll region of the Marshall Island Trust Territory held by the U.S.”

> “Last August the Air Force launched a Minuteman ICBM from Vandenberg Air Force base aimed for the Kwalaicin missile range which is used by the Army, Air Force, and navy. The radar experts in the Pacific found they were also tracking an unidentified flying object next to the ICBM’s nose cone. Radar picked up a inverted saucer-shape object to the right and above the descending nose cone and watched it cross the warhead’s trajectory to a point which was below and to-the-left of it before the phantom ship disappeared.The ghost ship was described as being 10-feet high and 40-feet long.”

> “Two separate radar systems saw it at the same time which may eliminate the probability that there was a malfunction in one of the radar systems.It was also reported that 3 other identical objects were seen in the vicinity – the same size, shape, and dimensions.One scientist said the data indicated that the phantom ship ‘flew under its own power’ but cold not explain what sort of ‘power’ was involved.”

> “So far none of the experts here believe the ghost ship was a natural phenomenon caused by freak weather conditions or echoes commonly seen on radar screens.”

> When FOIA inquiries were filed with the Army, they denied having any records concerning the sighting. We were referred to Vandenberg AFB, California. Vandenberg responded that “in accordance with Air Force manual 12-50 which implements the Federal Records Act, the launch operations records for August 1973 have been destroyed.” Note that it is not stated that the UFO tracking report was destroyed, only a very general statement is given that “launch operations records” were destroyed. That such a mysterious event as this would not be kept somewhere for possible future use is incomprehensible. Yet this excuse is offered time and time again to deny access to records …

> 8. Charles Huffer, a teacher at the Berlin American High School in Germany, attempted to locate information from the files of the Secretary of Defense relating to the Iranian incident involving two F-4 fighters engaged 3 UFOs. They denied this request in a July 5, 1977 letter. Huffer appealed the decision and finally obtained the release of a 3-page message about the report on August 31, 1977, via the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the military counterpart to the CIA.The details are fascinating:

> “This report forwards information concerning the sighting of a UFO in Iran on 19 September 1976.”

> “A.At about 1230 A.M. on 19 Sep. 76 the{deleted} received four telephone calls from citizens living in the Shemiran area of Tehran saying that they had seen strange objects in the sky. Some reported a kind of bird-like object while others reported a helicopter with a light on. There were no helicopters airborne at that time. After he told the citizens it was only stars and had talked to Mehrabad Tower, he decided to look for himself. He noticed an object in the sky similar to a star bigger and brighter.He decided to scramble an F-4 from Shahrokhi AFB to investigate.”

> “B.At 0130 hrs on the 19th the F-4 took off and proceeded to a point about 40 NM north of Tehran.Due to its brilliance, the objects were easily visible from 70 miles away. As the F-4 approached a range of 25 NM, he lost all instrumentation and communications (UHF and intercom). He broke off the intercept and headed back to Shahrokhi.When the F-4 turned away from the object and apparently was no longer a threat to it, the aircraft regained all instrumentation and communications. At 0140 hrs a second F-4 was launched. The backseater acquired a radar lock-on at 27 NM 12 o’clock high position with the VC (rate of closure) at 150 NMPH. As the range decreased to 25 NM the object moved away at a speed that was visible on the radar scope and stayed at 25 NM.”

> “C.The size of the radar return was comparable to that of a 707 tanker. The visual size of the object was difficult to discern because of its intense brilliance. The light that it gave off was that of flashing strobe lights arranged in a rectangular pattern and alternating blue, green, red, and orange in color. The sequence of the lights was so fast that all the colors could be seen at once. The object and the pursuing F-4 continued on a course to the south of Tehran when another brightly-lighted object – estimated to be one-half to one-third the apparent size of the moon – came out of the original object.This second object headed straight toward the F-4 at a very fast rate-of-speed. The pilot attempted to fire an AIM-9 Sidewinder missile at the object but at that instant his weapons control panel went off and he lost all communications (UHF and interphone). At this point the pilot initiated a turn and negative-G dive to get away.As he turned the object fell in trail at what appeared to be about 3-4 NM. As he continued in his turn away from the primary object, the second object went to the inside of his turn then returned to the primary object for a perfect rejoin.”

> “D.Shortly after the second object joined up with the primary object, another object appeared to come out of the other side of the primary object going straight down at a great rate-of-speed. The F-4 crew had regained communications and the weapons control panel and watched the object approach the ground anticipating a large explosion. This object appeared to come to rest gently on the earth and cast a very bright light over an area of about 2-3 kilometers. The crew descended from their altitude of 25,000 to 15,000 and continued to observe and mark the object’s position. They had some difficulty in adjusting their night visibility for landing, so after orbiting Mehrabad a few times they went out for a straight in landing.There was a lot of interference on the UHF and each time they passed through a mag. Bearing of 150 degrees from Mehrabad they lost their communications (UHF and interphone) and the INS fluctuated from 30 degrees to 50 degrees. The one civil airliner that was approaching Mehrabad during this same time experienced communications failure in the same vicinity (Kilo Zulu) but did not report seeing anything. While the F-4 was on a long final approach the crew noticed another cylinder-shaped object (about the size of a T-bird at 10M) with bright steady lights on each end and a flasher in the middle. When queried the tower stated there was no other known traffic in the area.During the time that the object passed over the F-4 the tower did not have a visual on it but picked it up after the pilot told them to look between the mountains and the refinery.”

> “E.During daylight the F-4 crew was taken out to the area in a helicopter where the object had apparently landed.Nothing was noticed at the spot where they thought the object landed (a dry lake bed) but as they circled off to the west of the area they picked up a very noticeable beeper signal.At the point where the return was the loudest was a small house with a garden. They landed and asked the people within if they had noticed anything strange last night. The people talked about a loud noise and a very bright light like lightning.The aircraft and area where the object is believed to have landed are being checked for possible radiation.”

> “More information will be forwarded when it becomes available.”

> Equally as fascinating as the report itself was a form attached to the basic information given in the message. Titled, ‘Defense Information Report Evaluation’, it was an assessment of the quality of the Iran sighting details as determined by the Defense Intelligence Agency (which deals with foreign military intelligence).The form indicated in checked boxes that the reliability of information was ‘Confirmed by other sources’, that the value of information was ‘High (Unique, Timely, and of Major Significance)’, and that the utility of information was ‘Potentially Useful’.The form also added in the ‘Remarks’ section :

> “An outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon:

> 1. The object was seen by multiple witnesses from different locations (i.e., Shamiran, Mehrabad, and the dry lake bed) and viewpoints (both airborne and from the ground).
> 2. The credibility of many of the witnesses was high (an Air Force general, qualified aircrews, and experienced tower operators).
> 3. Visual sightings were confirmed by radar.
> 4. Similar electromagnetic effects (EME) were reported by three separate aircraft.
> 5. There were physiological effects on some crew embers (i.e., loss of night vision due to the brightness of the object).
> 6. An inordinate amount of maneuverability was displayed by the UFOs.”

> Judging from the comments by the DIA, the Iranian UFO chase was undoubtedly one of the premier UFO encounters in the history of the subject.A highly advanced vehicle – performing well beyond our present-day capabilities – created fits for the American-equipped Iranian Air Force. That the blackouts of the missile firing control panel – just before the pilot was about to launch his AIM-9 missile – could be attributed to a mechanical fault seems beyond what sheer odds would allow. That an instrumentation blackout should occur on two separate F-4 aircraft as they were chasing a UFO is even more unlikely.Unfortunately, as in many other sightings we’ve discussed, while it has been stated in the Iranian message that “more information will be forwarded when it becomes available”, such information has not been made available to the public.

> It was only in 1981 that the Air Force revealed another bit of information regarding the Iranian case. Requests for information on the sighting, directed to the National Security Agency (NSA), revealed that an article written by a Captain Henry Shields was published in a periodical called the “MIJI Quarterly”.Published 4-times-a-year, the MIJI Quarterly contains narrative summaries of al “meaconing”, “intrusion”, and “jamming incidents” (therefore, ‘MIJI’) and is published by the Headquarters Electronic Security Command at San Antonio, Texas.(In case one may wonder, “meaconing” is a classified Air Force term and we cannot provide a definition for it.)

> Captain Shields’ article -- titled “Now You See It, Not You Don’t” – was included in the third quarter 1978 issue (then classified “Secret”) and detailed the Iranian case in a 3-page summary. The lead-in to the article is particularly interesting:“Sometime in his career, every pilot can expect to encounter strange, unusual happenings which will never be adequately or entirely explained by logic or subsequent investigation.The following article recounts just such an episode as reported by two F-4 Phantom crews of the Imperial Iranian Air Force during late 1976. No additional information or explanation of the strange events has been forthcoming: the story will be filed away and probably forgotten, but it makes interesting, and possibly disturbing, reading.” Here we have an important endorsement for the anomalous nature of the sighting.It is very likely that a significant portion of what happened in the aftermath of the pilots’ experiences has been highly classified … so high that even the author of the MIJI Quarterly article could not obtain further data regarding the landing.

> 9. Another story comes by a witness dubbed “Bill Smith” to honor his desire for anonymity. He aid that during 1974 a black, unmarked helicopter had landed by his home in Long Island and that armed guards had gotten out and had spoken with him:

> “It was in 1974. It was early in the morning when a Chinook helicopter came down across the way from my home.As the helicopter landed on the beach, men began to jump out of the craft, which was charcoal black in color with no markings.These men were dressed in black pajama-type uniforms and carried M-16 rifles. The area where the helicopter came down is called the ‘Sore Thumb’ and is about 500 feet from my home in an open area on the beach.The men in the black uniforms began to set up a perimeter on the beach. I walked down towards one of the guards who came to within about 200 yards of my house.I tried to talk to him; but he did not answer me, he was all business. I could see that he had no patches on his uniform and there was a microphone attached to his shirt. He was wearing a black, baseball-type hat and had black jump boots on.”

> “A police car from the Suffolk County police department came into the area and a police officer went over to the guard and asked some questions.The officer asked, ‘Who are you and what is going on?’ The guard didn’t answer.The officer then said, ‘Look, you’re standing here carrying a weapon and you’re in an unidentified uniform.I’d like some identification.’Again, the guard didn’t answer.The policeman stated, ‘If you don’t answer me pretty soon, you’re going to end up on the ground in handcuffs.’The guard in the black uniform said, ‘I don’t think so.Look around.’Apparently all these guys could talk-to or hear one another over the microphones. As the police officer turned around, the other men in the black uniforms were all pointing their guns at the officer.The officer went to his cruiser and called his superior and told him what had happened. He was then apparently told to get out of the area.The officer left in his car.I could see other helicopters out over the ocean.These were smaller craft but they too were black in color and had no markings.”

> “As if by signal all the men suddenly returned to the large helicopter and lifted off and disappeared. We later learned that the Air Force had been removing warheads from missiles on Long Island and was flying them to a holding area in New Jersey when one of the helicopters developed engine trouble and made a forced landing 3 miles down the beach in parking lot 9. The helicopter that landed in front of my home was a security group to protect the downed craft.”

> What are some of the prominent speculative explanations which might provide answers to the cattle mutilation / helicopter / UFO link?Let’s suggest several:

> 1) The helicopters are UFOs disguised to appear as terrestrial craft.

> 2) The helicopters are government vehicles directly involved in conducting animal mutilations.

> 3) The helicopters are government vehicles not directly involved in the mutilations, but engaged in investigating and monitoring the activities of the real mutilators.

> 4) The helicopters belong to a “para-government”, a group operating as a government within a government, much like the rumored “54-12” group that supposedly began during the Eisenhower administration.

> The last two seem the most plausible. We cannot rule out a “para-government” operation, although we would like to be more specific about possibilities in this area.If a “54-12” group exists, we feel that the idea of helicopters being used by the government, or para-government, to monitor UFO and mutilation activity seems to be the most attractive hypothesis.We’ve seen convincing evidence that the government is quite baffled by these reports. To handle a problem like this, it would make sense to organize a “quick response unit”, much like the “rapid deployment force” used by the military to react to volatile political situations around the world.This quick response unit could be sent to areas of high UFO and mutilation activity to assess each case or possibly to surprise the perpetrators. This unit would come under the highest security classification since to admit that (1) these incidents are real and (2) they are unexplainable would not be in the government’s best interests.

> For years, there have been rumors of a very elite group within the Air Force that was highly mobile and was used for retrieval of crashed UFOs and for other emergency situations. Long-time UFO researcher Leonard Stringfield, who has been working in the area of “Retrievals of the Third Kind”, had come across similar information about this elite group from military sources.

> 10. The National Security Agency (NSA) came into being on November 4, 1952 without fanfare. Since that time it has been generally regarded as the most secret agency in the United States, cloaked in an aura of top security.Very little is known about how the NSA performs its work except that it is quite efficient and productive in its duties.So much information is generated in NSA operations that it is shed to shred fifty tons of documents per day.Based in Ft. Meade, Maryland the NSA employs tens of thousands of people in a massive complex of buildings with a multi-billion dollar budget. Their function is to collect and analyze international communications through a network of radio disk antennas, computers, listening posts, and satellites worldwide, thus earning the name the “Ears of America”.The NSA can listen to virtually every telegram and phone conversation made internationally, not to mention domestically.The Central Security Service is responsible for code making and breaking, and its chief is also the NSA’s Director.

> When the Freedom of Information Act appeared in the mid-1970’s, UFO researchers recognized that an agency which collected information via electronic signals might have gathered a considerable number of UFO reports and information.Even with the FOIA, requesting data would be a difficult task. No law was ever enacted to cover NSA activities, so the agency might be regarded as virtually immune to scrutiny by any means.

> Initial requests to the NSA were unproductive. They consistently denied having anything whatsoever on UFOs in their divisions. A February 20, 1976 letter answering a request by UFO researcher Robert Todd stated “Regarding your inquiry about UFOs, please be advised that NSA does not have any interest in UFOs in any manner.” The letter was signed by NSA’s Information Officer.This public policy on UFOs remained essentially intact until things began to turn around slightly in 1978.During litigation against the CIA for UFO, it was discovered that a portion of the CIA’s withheld data originated with another agency – the NSA.The CIA contacted the NSA on November 9, 1978 with a referral of 15 documents for review towards possible declassification. The attorney for the plaintiffs against the CIA – Peter Gersten – was informed of the referrals by the CIA on December 14. Admitting for the first time that they had files, NSA’s Chief, Policy Staff, Roy R. banner advised Gersten that the NSA records in the CIA’s holdings were exempt from release under 5 U.S.C., Section 552 (b) (1), which covers national security, and three other regulations. (Remember that the U.S. government has consistently denied that UFO’s exist and therefore cannot present a threat to national security!)

> Gersten tried other tactics. In a January 10, 1980 letter from Roy banner, the NSA advised Gersten that other documents existed within the scope of his FOIA request.But these, like the original 18, were exempt from release due to “national security”. It also stated that a total of 79 other documents, originating with “other” federal agencies or “components”, were being referred to those agencies for review toward release. On January 23, 1980 filed suit against the NSA in District Court, Washington, DC on behalf of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) to gain release of what the NSA admitted to be 135 UFO documents. The NSA’s specific reasons for withholding their UFO documents were outlined in the public affidavit filed September 30, 1980, and in general were based on disclosure of “COMINT” (communications intelligence) reports would reveal the NSA’s methods of intercepting foreign communications and compromise its operations to potential adversaries.

> Besides the public affidavit filed with the court, a 21-page top-secret In Camera affidavit was filed by the NSA. (“In Camera” means essentially that only the judge may see it , along with the NSA’s lawyers, thus effectively omitting the plaintiffs – CAUS – from any participation in the decision-making process.)The In Camera affidavit explained the contents, in legal form, of the NSA’s UFO holding and it remained a mystery throughout the legal battle. On November 18, 1980 the court issued its decision, granting summary judgment in favor of the NSA.An appeal was filed on January 12, 1981 but the court reinforced its decision in a Per Curium Judgment dated November 3, 1981. One last attempt to gain release of the NSA’s UFO file was made early in 1982 when Attorney Peter Gersten filed a petition to have the Supreme Court hear the case of CAUS v. NSA.The 84-page petition argued against the NSA’s sweeping classification of all UFO data, claiming that the NSA did not clearly justify its reasons for involving national security as a way to keep UFO files out of the public domain. It also questioned the actions of the court in not reviewing the documents firsthand, rather than relying upon a summary – prepared by the defendant – of what the files contain.

> On March 8, 1982 amid considerable publicity the Supreme Court “conveniently” decided NOT to hear the case. Headlines announced, “Court Rebuffs UFO Buffs” and “Supreme Court Dodges UFO Document Issue”, but the lawsuit was effectively over and the NSA’s 135 UFO papers still remained cloaked in mystery.The key to the original suit, the appeal, and the Supreme Court decision rested entirely on ONE document – the 21-page top-secret affidavit. It is amazing that while this document was prepared only for government lawyers and the judges involved in the cases, the original documents were seen by no one but the defendants (NSA). Therefore if merely the summary is classified “Top Secret” and the judge can see this, what classification do the 135 UFO documents bear that the judge can’t see?Succeeding FOIA requests to the NSA disclosed a total of 239 documents on UFOs, of which 79 originated with other government agencies leaving 160 documents with the NSA.But the reasons for not providing them were always “national security”.

> We have seen the NSA’s reasons for censorship. Are they legitimate? To a degree – yes. The security of the United States is vital to everyone. We, as much as anyone else who enjoys a democracy, would not wish any harm to come to the place we have lived all out lives.We know the NSA is trying to look out for our best interests.But the problem we raise is of universal importance. UFOs are seen everywhere by people of all races, creeds, and nationalities; it affects everyone.The UFO phenomenon is also centuries old. The only barriers thrown in the way of legitimate scientific study are political.It UFOs are a threat to our security – as has been shown quite distinctly – it is the public’s right to know this.

> The NSA shreds 50 tons of documents per day in its operations, but 279 UFO documents are saved? Why?Certainly not for reference to NSA interception techniques and personnel. These are easily available to NSA personnel elsewhere within the agency.It is evident that these are saved for the UFO subject matter. Furthermore, NSA’s monitors only choose the BEST sources of foreign intelligence.Why waste time on poor information?Foreign governments, just as the United States, have said publicly that UFOs are a nonsense subject. Yet they broadcast UFO data over their most important intelligence channels such that the NSA intercepts the broadcasts and retains the information under top security!

> We also question why the NSA finds it necessary to withhold UFO information that is up to 25-years-old and to use the excuse that disclosure of vital techniques of electronic interception would threaten our security.Surely the methods of electronic interception have changed considerably since 1958. This justification for withhold of UFO sightings acquired through what are likely to be obsolete methods strains credibility.

> 11. CAUS received a story by a security specialist who was assigned to the 6947th Security Squadron centered at Homestead Air Force base, a unite of the USAF Security Service (AFS).The specialist had attended a lecture in 1978 by nuclear physicist and UFO researcher Stanton Friedman and informed Friedman of the incident at the conclusion of the talk.

> The 6947th Security Squadron’s mission was to monitor all Cuban Air Force communications and radar transmissions. One hundred of the squadron’s men were assigned to Detachment “A”, located at Key West Naval Air Station. Several of these units were scattered geographically to enable direction-finding equipment to locate fixed or mobile land-based radar sites and communications centers and to plot aircraft movements from flight transmissions. One day in March 1967 the Spanish-speaking intercept operators of Detachment “A” heard Cuban air defense radar controllers report an unidentified “bogey” approaching Cuba from the northeast. The UFO entered Cuban air space at a height of 33,000 feet and sped off at nearly 660 mph.Two MIG-21 jet fighters were scrambled to meet it.

> The single-seat MIG-21 UM E76 is the standard, (at that time) top-of-the-line fighter supplied to Soviet block countries such as Cuba.It is capable of Mach 2.1 in level flight, service ceiling of 59,000 feet, and combat radius of more than 300 miles on internal fuel.The jets were guided to within 3 miles of the UFO by Cuban ground control intercept radar personnel.The flight leader radioed that the object was a bright metallic sphere with no visible markings or appendages.When a try at radio contact failed, Cuban air defense headquarters ordered the flight leader to arm his weapons and destroy the object.The leader reported his radar was locked onto the bogey and his missiles were armed.Seconds later, the wingman screamed to the ground controller that his leader’s jet had exploded! When he gained his composure, the wingman radioed there was no smoke or flame, that his leader’s MIG-21 had disintegrated.Cuban radar then reported the UFO quickly accelerated and climbed about 98,000 feet. At last report it was heading south-southeast towards South America.

> An Intelligence Spot Report was sent to NSA headquarters, since AFSS and its units are under NSA operational control. Such reports are standard practice in case of aircraft losses by hostile nations. NSA is required to acknowledge receipt of such reports. But the 6947th’s Detachment “A” did not get one.So it sent a follow-up report.Within hours, Detachment “A” received orders to ship all tapes and pertinent data to NSA and to list the Cuban aircraft loss in squadron files as due to “equipment malfunction”. At least 15-to-20 people in the Detachment were said to be fully informed of the incident. Presumably, the data sent to NSA included direction-finding measurements that NSA might later combine with other site’s data to triangulate the location and altitude of the MIG-21 flight paths. If the AFSS equipment in Florida was sensitive enough, the UFO could have been tracked by its reflection of the Cuban ground and airborne radar.

> 12. Persistent stories have come out of England about a UFO that had come down into Rendlesham Forest near the American-British Air Force base at Bentwaters on December 30, 1980. So much so that it is commonly referred to as the English “Roswell”.“Art Wallace” (pseudonym) was attached to Bentwaters AFB as a security policeman. Around December 30, 1980 he was on duty at the flight line when two men – a sergeant and a lieutenant – told him to get into their jeep because they were going over to the motor pool. On the way over, Wallace noticed many animals were running out of the woods nearby; something he had never seen before, even in the States.When they arrived at the motor pool, Wallace and the sergeant were told to get gas-power “light-alls” (trailer-mounted lights used for illuminating large areas). The lights were attached to the jeep, and they proceeded to the Bentwaters main gate where they met other vehicles. The convoy moved out toward Rendlesham Forest a few miles away.Wallace heard radio chatter mentioning names of people he knew plus “OSI”, most likely a reference to the Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations. Wallace saw security police as well as embers of the British military stationed all along the way.

> They pulled onto a dirt road and drove about a mile into the forest, stopping at what Wallace referred to a “staging point”. The men were ordered to check their weapons in since they would NOT be taking them along. Wallace went into the woods with 4 other men led by a captain.As they approached a clearing in the woods, they noticed brightness in the distance and sound of helicopters overhead.Wallace noticed an airman crying at the edge of the clearing with a medic attending him. This puzzled Wallace greatly as he couldn’t imagine what might have been going on. The first thing the men noticed when they had a clear view was that large movie cameras had been placed surrounding a field in the clearing. Many military and plainclothes personnel were milling about watching something.

> The “something” was an object, taking the appearance of a transparent aspirin tablet, hovering about 1-foot off-the-ground. Wallace estimated that the object was 50-feet in diameter and had a bright, pulsating, yellow mist inside. It did not move from its position. Wallace and some of the men approached the object to within about 10-feet.A radio call was heard over a field radio unit. A helicopter said, “Here it comes!” In the distance a read light appeared, first behind a pine tree, then in front of it.The light quickly sped over to the aspirin-shaped object and hovered at a position about 20-feet above it.After maintaining that position for a minute, the red light broke up. No explosion occurred in the conventional sense.The light merely broke up into a shower of particles.

> Suddenly in the place of the red light and the aspirin-shaped object, another vehicle appeared. Wallace said it was a domed disc, bright white in color, with an intricately detailed surface much like the models used in movies like “Star Wars” and “Close Encounters”.It had two appendages on the lower flange of the disc which seemed to be the beginning of delta wings but not quite.Shadows were cast on the surface of the disc by some of the raised-relief detail. Wallace and the men with him walked around the object and noticed an interesting effect. Their own shadows were cast onto the object, probably the bright “light-alls” in the field.Not only did their shadows bend upwards at the head, but also as they walked and then stopped – the shadows would appear to advance one pace more and then stop.Stunned and disbelieving of this effect, Wallace and the others walked and stopped several times, each time noticing the effect repeat itself. Additionally, the third time they tried this, a light came over the head of a shadow and moved from one head to another.

> Wallace recalled turning to say a few words to one of the men. The next thing he knew, he woke up in bed, fully dressed and muddy up to his knees.Wallace asked one of his companions in the barracks what time he had come in. He replied 4:00am. At that point he did not remember what had happened that night.As he went about his usual duties, Wallace began to recall the events. A phone call came later in the day. Wallace was summoned to his commander’s office with other security policemen who were at the scene of the UFO activity. Civilians were also in the office, giving Wallace the impression of being CIA-type personnel.The commander politely advised the men not to talk about the night’s events to anyone.They were brought into another room where the civilians – much more stern and rude – reminded the men of their duty and ordered them never to discuss the matter with anyone. They were checked for radiation, debriefed for an hour, and made to sign forms which re-emphasized the high-security nature of what happened.Wallace and others were put on a call-in schedule by which they would be required to phone a certain daily at 11:30am as a check on their whereabouts and activities.

> Wallace recalled being shown a film on UFOs in a room with other men for reasons he still doesn’t understand. The movie displayed film clips – some dating to World War II – of actual UFO activity in various places and times. Some of the sequences showed UFOs near what appeared to be fighter aircraft; and in one sequence from the Korean War, a disc-shaped object passed closed to a MIG fighter, causing it to crash. Wallace was told they were being shown this so they might better understand the need for secrecy on the events of the 30th.

> 13. Lastly we make mention of one other potential source of UFO data.The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is an intelligence agency whose very existence has been classified top-secret. It has an extraordinary budget and manages to hide this primarily in Air Force operations.It functions in such a manner that nothing about it subject to open scrutiny.

> The NRO’s mission is to monitor international communications (like the NSA) and to oversee the operation of the nation’s spy satellite system.Government officials have been known to refuse to discuss even the agency’s ‘name’ if it were brought up.How might the NRO’s operations relate to UFO research? Photo-reconnaissance satellites have advanced to such a degree that even individuals can be specifically identified from orbits hundreds of miles u.It strange aerial activity were to be detected in space as has been done in the past by NORAD, a photo-reconnaissance satellite could be expected to be pressed into duty by taking high-resolution photos of the UFOs. Significant strong evidence for UFOs may currently exist in the NRO’s files but accessibility would be virtually impossible under present security provisions.Such security could also protect an above-top-secret version of “Project Saint” in photographing UFO activity.

> “Saint” is an acronym for both Satellite Inspector and Satellite Interceptor.Initiated by the Air Force, Saint was to be a spacecraft designed to rendezvous with an unidentified object with the purpose of inspecting it with optical, infrared, and other radiation sensors.An advanced model of Saint would be capable of destroying the target. In effect, it was an early “killer satellite”.

> 14. On November 23, 1953, an F-89C was scrambled from Kinross Air Force Base, Michigan to investigate a UFO that had been picked-up on ground radar flying over Lake Superior. At 1822 EST the aircraft was 30,000 feet and descended to 7,000 feet to begin the interception. It was approximately 150 miles northeast from Kinross AFB. At 1851 EST the interceptor pilot was requested to turn to a heading of 20 degrees to the cut-off vector. After the turn was completed, the pilot was advised the UFO was at 11 o’clock, 10 miles distant. But shortly radar returns from both the F-89 and UFO were seen to “merge”.The combined radar return from the ”composite” aircraft indicated it was continuing on the original flight path of the UFO.But the radar return of the F-89 disappeared from the GCI stations’ radar scope.

> The military reported the “unknown” aircraft being intercepted was a Royal Canadian Air Force Dakota (C-47) flying from Winnipeg to Sudberry, Canada.A search for the missing F-89 was conducted by both USAF and RCAF aircraft without success. All civilian reports of seeing or hearing the aircraft were investigated with negative results. In fact, while this summary report states that the UFO was identified as a RCAF C-47, such was not the case. Maj. (ret) Donald Keyhoe said he contacted the Canadian military about this explanation, and they informed him that no such flight had taken place.The Air Force stubbornly clinged to their original story.After much deliberation with other key researchers of that era, Keyhoe saw no other explanation – and he admits he was valiantly searching for another because he didn’t want to accept what was ‘staring him the face’ – was that the mystery UFO, in this case using technology never before exhibited, somehow “captured”/abducted the pilot and his plane and departed for who-knows-where.

> Air Force officers, desiring complete confidence, have stated to us that many other pilot deaths have occurred as a result of jets being scrambled after UFOs.The officers feared that if information were traced back to them, some form of retaliation would take place.So their accounts provided only bare-bone details to us.

> the following excerpted from “The Cosmic Conspiracy” 2nd-Edition Stan Deyo ISBN 0-908477-04-X )

> note: Researcher Deyo is convinced there are two types of “saucers”. The alien type is too 200-300 years ahead of our current technology. The other type – based on electro-gravitics – has been studied by many nations since the 40’s. It can’t bridge dimensions like the alien so interstellar travel is not possible.But if certain problems can be overcome, it can be a quantum leap upwards from today’s jet fighters.One problem is the power source – how can you generate these incredibly high voltages using a small, lightweight power source? The other problem is related to materials and “insulating” occupants from becoming part of the “circuit”. Some back-engineering of crashed alien discs may have inadvertently provided an answer to the first problem – the power source. If this Element-115 does exist and can be utilized in a proton/anti-proton reaction, it will be drastically smaller than the massive fission reactors found aboard nuclear ships. Deyo further contends that many government agencies have covered-up major findings concerning the UFO situation while many allied agencies have never known anything has actually happened. Also some multi-national corporations have even participated in various stages of R&D of the advanced technological process which have ultimately produced electrically-propelled circular-winged aircraft, submarines, and spacecraft.

> 1. … there are TWO sources of “UFOs” or “flying saucers”. One is man-made from the mid-1950’s; and the other has been with mankind since the ancient days of the Old Testament and the Epic of Gilgamesh.One wonders why neither source has identified itself to mankind. In addition, one wonders if the “elder source” did not infiltrate and take control of mankind’s fledging flying saucer research and development programs of the last 4 decades … yes, one wonders …..

> Mr. Ansel E. Talbert, military and aviation editor for the New York Herald Tribune, began a series of 3 articles on November 20, 1955 covering the then-current, world-wide research efforts to conquer the secret of gravity as a means of obtaining energy to propel various descriptions of both aircraft and spacecraft.From those articles was the following :

> “The initial steps of an almost incredible program to solve the secret of gravity and universal gravitation are being taken today in many of American’s top scientific laboratories and research centers …”

> “…the current efforts to understand gravity and universal gravitation both at the sub-atomic level and at the level of the Universe have the positive backing today of many of America’s outstanding physicists.These include Dr. Edward Teller of the University of California, who received prime credit for developing the hydrogen bomb; Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton; Dr. Freeman J. Dyson, theoretical physicist at the Institute; and Dr. John A. Wheeler, professor of physics at Princeton University, who made important contributions to America’s first nuclear fission project”.

> “…there are gravity research projects in every major country of the world. A few are over 30 years old … most are much newer … some are purely theoretical … some projects are mostly empirical, studying gravitic isotopes, electrical phenomena and the statistics of mass”

> The work of Dr. T. Townsend Brown on his electro-gravitic discs was (at that date) the result of 30 years’ research.He had succeeded in building electrically-propelled disc airfoils which he had patented in the U.S. In the 1950’s he and others discovered that ”…a localized gravitic field used as a ponderamotive force has been created in the laboratory. Disc airfoils 2 feet in diameter and incorporating a variation of the simple two-plate electrical condenser charged with 50 kilovolts and a total continuous energy input of 50 watts have achieved a speed of 11 mph in a circular air course 20 feet in diameter. More lately (circa 1955) these discs have been increased in diameter to 3 feet and run in a 50-foot diameter air course under a charge of a 150 KV with results so impressive as to be highly classified.Variations of this work done under a vacuum have produced much greater efficiencies that can only be described as startling.Work is now under way to develop a flame-jet generator to supply power up to 15-milion volts.”

> The April 1955 issue of Scientific American printed an article dealing with both the history of and current develop within the field of electro-statics.On page 110 of that discussion is a most enlightening dissertation on the effects of vacuums and high voltages on mechanical forces within atoms. It discussed the research of Professor John G. Trump (of M.I.T.’s electrical engineering department) on electro-static power generating techniques:“Professor Trump illustrates how the power-generating capacity of electro-static machines may be stepped up by asking you to consider 2 metallic plates, 100 square inches in area, facing each other and separated by an insulator. If a voltage amounting to an electric field of 300 volts-per-centimeter is applied between them, the plates will be attracted to each other with a force of 1/2000th of a pound. Increase the field to 30,000 volts-per-centimeter and the attraction now becomes a half a pound [this meant that 1000 times the force was generated with only 100 times the voltage] .Now immerse the plates in a high vacuum – a good insulator, though one difficult to maintain – and increase the field to 3,000,000 volts-per-centimeter. The force of attraction jumps to 5,7000 pounds! [this meant that 11,400 times the previous force was generated with – again – only 100 times the voltage!]”

> “Such a force raised exponentially to levels capable of pushing man-carrying vehicles though the air – or outer space (a vacuum of very good insulation properties) – at ultra-high speed is now the object of concerted effort in several countries. One achieved it will eliminate most of the structural difficulties now encountered in the construction of high-speed aircraft.”

> In December 1956 Gravity Rand Ltd – located in London – published a discussion entitled The Gravitics Situation. It is one piece of documentation that an ordinary reader will not be able to acquire without great endurance or incredible luck.It puts the finger on so many nerve centers of the body of those scientists who sired “anti-gravity” that there can be no doubt to the enlightened reader that ‘mankind has developed anti-gravity’.As a result this document has been totally reproduced in the public interest as Appendix 3 [of Deyo’s book].To fully appreciate the implications of the document, one should read the entire thing. However, certain key phrases from its 43 pages of technical discussion have been selected to give a brief picture of its purpose.They follow below :

> Page 3: “This point has been appreciated in the United States and a program in hand may now ensure that development of large size disks will be continued.This is backed by the U.S. government, but it is something that will be pursued on a small scale.This acceptance follows Brown’s original suggestion embodied in Project Winterhaven, which recommended that a major effort be concentrated on electrogravitics based on the principle of his disks.”

> Page 4: “…aims were re-written around a new report which apparently based on newer thoughts than Winterhaven and with some later patents not yet published – which form the basis of current U.S. policy.It is a matter of some controversy whether this research could be accelerated by more money but the impression in Gravity Rand is that the base of industry is perhaps more than adequately wide.Already companies are specializing in evolution of particular components of an electrogravitics disk. This implies that the science is in the same state as the ICBM – namely that no new breakthroughs are needed, only intensive development engineering.”

> Page 4 (con’t): … The power of the device to undermine the electrostatic force holding the atom together is a destructive by-product of military significance.In unpublished work Gravity Rand has indicated the possible effect of such a device for demolition.”

> Page 7: “If a real spin or rotation is applied to a planar geoid, the gravitational equipotentials can be made less convex, plane or concave.These have the effect of adjusting the intensity of the gravitational field at will: which is a requirement for the gravity absorber.”

> Page 13: “Again the principle will function equally in a vacuum – Townsend Brown’s saucers could move in a vacuum readily enough – but the supporting parts must also work in a vacuum. In practice they tend to give trouble, just as gas turbine bits and pieces start giving trouble in proportion to the altitude gained in flight.”

> Also in the Gravity Rand document was a discussion by Professor F. Mozer on the existence of negative mass particles and their utilization in the construction of neutral-gravity bodies. [It beings on page 30.] Also of special interest to a few will be the brief discussion by Dr. Deser and Dr. Arnowitt which begins on page 39.It is entitled A Link Between Gravitation and Nuclear Energy”.It used Einstein’s usual structures found in General Relativity as a building stone for a so-called “creation tensor” to convert gravitational energy to nuclear energy.Their field equations are difficult and are not in a readily solvable state. Still they do represent an interesting aspect for some.

> This incredible document was compiled in 1956 ! Can there be any doubt that such information has been superceded by even more incredible developments in the last 40 years?…. No !

> The Russians have never been one to be left out.They have resorted to many types of subterfuge to obtain the secrets of anti-gravity propulsion systems. To this end, they enticed one of the West’s most brilliant physicists -- a former “member of the fathers of the hydrogen-bomb group – to defect to Russia in 1950. As it turns out, he was a KGB employee … Dr. Bruno Pontecorvo. Since at least 1961, it has been known by the CIA that he had successfully demonstrated a gravitic aircraft (which had no ‘engine’) for the Russians.It has also been learned that the chief of all Russian anti-gravity research is Dr. Andrei Sakharov [note: at the time Deyo’s book was written]. His American counterpart is Dr. Edward Teller who worked in closed association with more than 50 U.S. anti-gravity research programs since the early 1950’s.

> 2. Dr. Teller helps “sponsor” bright young minds [also refer to the claims of Bob Lazar]

> [Deyo was educated at the U.S. Air Force Academy.He contends that he and his classmates were involuntary participants in an accelerated-learning curriculum that involved technology gleaned from CIA mind-control experiments. Something went wrong with the program. To cover up the embarrassment, the Air Force accused 186 cadets of “cheating on their exams”. Deyo was one.He quit the Academy in protest and eventually became a citizen of Australia. He retained many friends from the Academy including professors who were impressed with his sharp mind. So much so that the U.S. government was interested in getting Deyo to do research, even if it was by way of Australia with whom the U.S. shared a huge ultra-top-secret base at Pine Gap (at which many white discs with the USAF insignia have been observed being stored) .]

> The letters from Dr. James R. Maxfield arrived in Melbourne on May 15 1972.they had been dictated 6 days earlier in Dr. Maxfield’s radiation research clinic in Dallas, Texas.One of the letters instructed me [Deyo] to have a visit with Sir John Williams. The same letter also stated that the Chief Superintendent of the Aeronautical Research lab at Melbourne would be contacted by both Sir John and Dr. Maxfield on my behalf (so that I [Deyo] might seek employment there to continue my research into ‘anti-gravity’). Dr. Maxfield’s letter went on to say that he and Dr. Edward Teller were planning to come to Australia in October and hoped they might ‘get together’ with him.The second letter was a copy of the one which Dr. Maxfield had sent to the A.R.L. Superintendent. It had told him that, although I [Deyo] was working as a computer systems analyst for a well-known tractor firm in Melbourne, that he (Maxfield) hoped the A.R.L. could find a position for me – as I had been working in a field that he (Maxfield) and Dr. Teller had been ‘interested in’. I knew what that ‘field’ was … ‘Anti-Gravity’ .

> In my [Deyo’s] last meeting with Dr. Maxfield in America in 1971, I [Deyo] was told about various other research projects in America which had been or were under the watchful eyes of Dr. Edward Teller.It was an incredible moment!It was like meeting the real Santa Claus … finding out that the mysterious ‘they’ really did have names and faces … and super-technology.Dr. Maxfield told me [Deyo] how he and ‘Ed Teller’ had ‘sponsored other young minds’ (like mine) in the pursuits of the secrets of gravitational energy … It was mind-boggling.He went on to say that there had been over 50 ‘anti-gravity’ research projects in the U.S. since 1948!

> I [Deyo] then prepared 2 preliminary papers on electro-gravitic propulsion for the A.R.L. as per Dr. Maxfield’s instructions.After a few weeks had passed, Dr. Tom Keeble – the director of the mechanical engineering division of the A.R.L. – called me [Deyo] into the facility for a critique of my preliminary papers.Dr. Keeble with two of his research staff attended the closed-door meeting. A short time was spent discussing the papers and some of the somewhat embarrassing mistakes I [Deyo] made when preparing the material.After this, Dr. Keeble asked why I [Deyo] had not stayed in America to finish my research. I [Deyo] then related the long story of my FBI involvement, my training at the U.S. Air Force Academy, and my subsequent and somewhat peripheral involvement in the U.S. ‘anti-gravity’ research program.Dr. Keeble looked as though he wanted to say something which he felt he could not because of certain ‘restrictions’.His furrowed brow framed his bushy eyebrows as he finally said, “Look, we know your theory works; … your design is not the best for a fully-operational model; … but it will work … What has puzzled us the most is how you found out about it … about the project …”

> He went on to say, something like “We knew that the Yanks – no offense meant – and the Canadians did some mind-control or tuning experiments in the early sixties; but we thought they had abandoned it because so many of the test blokes had gone mental or suicided under the subliminal effects of the conditioning. Yet, here you are as living proof they did succeed.” I [Deyo] interjected, saying “Yes, that could be quite true.However if it is, then you apparently made the assumption that I am not one of those who cracked-up under the strain … haven’t you?”

> “Yes”, he said as he smiled, “We have made that assumption here.Furthermore, I personally feel that your mind is one of those they tuned to tap into – now don’t laugh – other people’s sub-conscious minds.”

> “You’re joking! I [Deyo} interjected. “Look, don’t patronize me.If you do think I’m nuts, just say so, and let’s be done with it!”

> This must have convinced Dr. Keeble and his staff to chance trying to tell me [Deyo] some things which might ordinarily have been too risky for them to have said at that moment. The room was apparently bugged by ASIO (Australian Security and Intelligence Organization) – or so they were trying to tell me [Deyo] with their silent gestures toward the book shelf behind them followed with questions as to whether-or-not ASIO had, as yet, contacted me [Deyo]. In fact, one of the chaps in the meeting suggested that, because of the very quiet manner I [Deyo] had used to enter Australia, ASIO might not have known what information I [Deyo] had stored away in my sub-conscious data bank.

> Dr. Keeble leaned forward and said, “There are extensive motion-picture libraries of these flying saucers taken right here in Australia.The RAAF have control of these libraries.I’ve seen them.Good stuff you yanks have put together on that project!”As he finished speaking, I [Deyo] asked him if I [Deyo] could see these filmed records.Dr. Keeble and his colleagues all said, “Oh no, you couldn’t possibly … they require a clearance that you as a yank cannot obtain.”Yet as they were all saying these words, with their hands they were frantically pointing to the bookshelf and in some cases miming the word ‘maybe’ with their lip movements.Their message came though … Whoever was bugging their room was not of the same philosophy as those people present; however on-or-more present would make a later attempt to show me those film records.

> Dr. Keeble tried to say some more … “You see, there’s something like a group of us who … ah … “ I [Deyo] interjected, “By group, do you mean a club or a formal organization?”

> “No”, he said, “… scientists, engineers around the world … we feel … well … I …” and his voice trailed off leaving the sentence unfinished as he allowed one of his staff to add further comments on the earlier subject of ‘mind training’ before he, himself, joined into the same discussion. “So you see your mind can theoretically eavesdrop on the collective knowledge of all those people in the world who study or practice any of the subjects your mind might ever wish to, consciously, address as a means to solving any problem requiring conceptual knowledge which you have previously gained by any other scholastic or practical means …”[note: makes you wonder if Deyo possessed a “remote-viewer’s” type of mind and was “recruited” to do psychic-spying on foreign research.Or is this some ability that even “normal people” possess and there’s some new experimental technology out there that can transfer experts in their fields into “psychic spies”?]

> The very thought made my [Deyo] mind race with the possibilities – the very probabilities – that what I had just heard was true! … “But then”, I [Deyo] thought, “who would believe me, if I told them I have already experience this school-of-the-mind effect? Who indeed ...” One wonders what poor Valentich really got to see on the RAAF base at Sale.Was it the actual UFO films ?

> Months passed after the Melbourne meeting and I was NOT taken into the employment of the A.R.L. In fact both papers previously submitted to the A.R.L. had even been ‘classified’ and removed from the receiving authority at the A.R.L. Strange events began to manifest. Someone broke into my {Deyo} home in broad daylight … and touched nothing! When the local police were called-in and shown the forced entry, their answer was, “Sorry, mate, this is a political situation and we can’t do anything about it.”

> Weeks passed and Dr. J. Alan Hynek came to town.I [Deyo] was summoned to see him by an intermediary.The meeting took place in an attorney’s penthouse in Melbourne. Dr. Hynek questioned me [Deyo] on my knowledge of the UFO situation.Copies of the previously mentioned A.R.L. documents were given to Dr. Hynek. After a lengthy discussion, Dr. Hynek smiled and reached into his pocket and produced a hidden pocket tape record – which he then turned-off.He asked if I [Deyo] had ever discussed the UFO-cover-up situation with the American comedian, Dick Gregory.The answer was No … but why do you ask?”Hynek then said that Dick Gregory had made the same claims and had named the same responsible parties to Hynek himself just before Hynek had left the U.S. for Melbourne.Hynek advised me [Deyo] to ‘keep in touch’ at a particular address and telephone number in the U.S.

> It was not until months later when a phone call from a ‘reliable source’ in Auckland, New Zealand informed me [Deyo] that both Hynek and an attorney in Melbourne were CIA operative that the situation became a bit clearer.Apparently I [Deyo] had caused quite a stir in certain local and international intelligence organizations by releasing basic theories about suppressed ‘flying saucer’ technology to the civilian populace of Melbourne and Auckland. It became more and more obvious with subsequent ‘unofficial’ visits by A.S.I.O. operatives and employees from the Australian Defense Standards Lab that I [Deyo] was under the ‘eyepiece’.

> my notes:

> Blame it the Occam’s Razor principle, but I am becoming more convinced that a lot of the UFO-type incidents – particularly those involving cattle mutilations and human abductions – are the result of our own government’s development of advanced mind control technology.This itself seems far-fetched until I read all the accounts of the MK-ULTRA project.If true it would be easy to any government to commit all sorts of atrocities and – by way of a memory implant – blame it on those nasty aliens (“you can’t sue us, you have to sue ‘them’ --- and our position is ‘they’ don’t exist and therefore are not a threat to national security).I am beginning to think a lot of tales of Montauk and Ong’s Hat were “fabricated” to cover up mind control development.I once saw an episode on “NOVA” where a medical researcher at Brookhaven National Labs was detailing a recent discovery on cancer chemistry within the human brain.I was thinking why is this research being done in a nuclear laboratory? Why not Johns Hopkins Medical Center, or St. Jude’s, or Harvard or UCLA Schools of Medicine, or the Cleveland Clinic? I know it’s politically “fashionable” nowadays to convert military facilities for civilian uses and military-oriented technology toward industrial purposes. But this discovery was made 20 years ago when the Cold War was still rampant.What business does a nuclear facility have in conducting brain research (other than how radiation affects the human body)?That and other incidents have made me lean more to what Bob Lazar and others have been suggesting:that most of the horrific incidents blamed on aliens are really done by NSA government forces, and that it mind control – developing a super army or a group of “mole” assassins ready-to-kill at the push of a button.

> If this still sounds too fictiony to you, consider the notorious date rape drug originally used by veterinarians to sedate animals prior to surgery. On humans it has the effect of rendering them unconscious and then wiping-out any memory for hours prior-to and during. Degenerates have taken advantage of this by mixing it in a victim’s drink, which causes her to black-out. They take her somewhere to ravage her unconscious body. Afterwards she can’t remember anything during the attack as well as even being offered a drink or who her attacker was. Then this was perpetuated on someone who was on a cranberry juice diet. While helpless to physically stop her attackers, it counteracted the drug’s effect on her memory so she was able to identify her attackers to the police. After some investigating, they were able to discover the drug that was behind all these mystery crimes. If such a drug is available to simple civilians, what Top-Secret mind-control technology must be available to covert forces?!

> (the following was excerpted from “the Philadelphia Experiment Murder” by Alexandra “Chica” Bruce ISBN 0-9631889-5-X.Chica’s book interweaves Phil Schneider’s allegations, the Philadelphia Experiment, UFOs, the Montauk Project, and the Incunabula legend whereas other books typically concentrate on only one of these subjects. It’s good reading and worth the small paperback cost…)

> There are the protocols that are rumored to be among those used to created “ultimate warriors” such as Navy Seals and other Special Forces operatives and combatants.The creation of such subjects is reported to be an aspect of the Monarch Project, a subproject of MK-ULTRA.The following is … from an article entitled “Project Monarch: Nazi Mind Control” by Ron Patton … :“The most incriminating statement to date made by a government official as to the possible existence of Project Monarch was extracted by Anton Chaitkin, a writer for the publication The New Federalist.Then former CIA Director William Colby was asked directly, ‘What about Monarch?’, he replied angrily and ambiguously, ‘We stopped that between the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.’ “It is interesting to note that Colby was eventually found dead floating in Chesapeake Bay under mysterious circumstances.

> Continuing to quote from the above-cited article:

> “Dr. Corydon Hammond, a psychologist from the University of Utah, delivered a stunning lecture entitled ‘Hypnosis in MPD: Ritual Abuse’, at the Fourth Annual Eastern Regional Conference on Abuse and Multiple Personality, June 25, 1992 in Alexandria, Virginia. He essentially confirmed the suspicions of the attentive crowd of mental health professionals, wherein a certain percentage of their clients had undergone mind control programming in an intensively systematic manner.Hammond alluded to the Nazi connection, military and CIA mind control research. Greek letter and color programming and specifically mentioned the “Monarch Project” in relation to a form of operative conditioning.{These Greek letter codes for programming levels include:}

> ALPHA: Regarded as ‘general’ or regular programming within the base control personality, characterized by extremely pronounced memory retention, along with substantially increased physical strength and visual acuity. Alpha programming is accomplished through deliberately subdividing the victim’s personality which, in essence, causes a left brain – right brain division, allowing for a programmed union of L and R through neuron pathway stimulation.

> BETA: Referred to as ‘sexual’ programming. This programming eliminates all learned moral convictions and stimulates the primitive sexual instinct, devoid of inhibitions.

> DELTA:This is known as ‘killer’ programming, originally developed for training special agents or elite solider (i.e., Delta Force, First Earth Battalion, Mossad, etc.) in covert operations.Optimal adrenal output and controlled aggression is evident. Subjects are devoid of fear; very systematic in carrying out their assignment.Self-destruct or suicide instructions are layered in at this level.

> THETA: Considered to be the ‘psychic’ programming. Bloodliners (those coming from multi-generational satanic families) were determined to exhibit a greater propensity for having telepathic abilities than did non-bloodliners.Due to its evident imitations, however, various forms of electronic mind control systems were developed and introduced, namely, biomedical human telemetry devices (brain implants), directed-energy lasers using microwaves and/or electromagnetism.It is reported these are used in conjunction with highly-advanced computers and sophisticated satellite tracking systems.

> OMEGA:A ‘self-destruct’ form of programming, also known as ‘Code Green’. The corresponding behaviors include suicidal tendencies and/or self-mutilation.This program is generally activated when the victim/survivor begins therapy or interrogation and too much memory is being recovered.

> GAMMA: Another form of system protection is through ‘deception’ programming, which elicits misinformation and misdirection. This level is intertwined with demonology and tends to regenerate itself at a later time if inappropriately deactivated.”

> [note: recall that Bob Lazar stated he suspected mind control had been performed on him, as has been alleged as “standard” indoctrination to anyone – military or civilian – who works on any of these above-top-secret projects.]

> > All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
> > FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and for the general purpose of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, research and / or educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use this material for purposes other than provided by law. You must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/index.html,