### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 8c * [Part 3 of 3 parts]
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    Notes:

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editor unless
    otherwise noted.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Contributing Editors: Walter Bowart
                          Harlan Girard

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    ================================================================
    [Continued from part 2]

    Moody: Can you tell us how many Rule 11 evaluations pertaining to
    competency to stand trial and state of mind at the time of the
    crime you've performed?

    Morenz: I can't tell you exactly how many, but there have been
    several hundred that I've performed.

    Moody: Over the last year how many Rule 11 evaluations have you
    performed?

    Morenz: Probably roughly on the order of a hundred.

    Moody: Who usually contacts you and asks you to do a Rule 11
    evaluation, the State or the defense?

    Morenz: I'm usually contacted by the judge's secretary to
    schedule the Rule 11. I don't always know who has nominated me by
    the court. Sometimes I'm aware. Sometimes it's the prosecution
    and sometimes it's the defense, it varies.

    Moody went for Morenz's prejudices. He asked him how many he'd
    found competent to stand trial and how many he'd found sane last
    year.

    Morenz: The last time I checked, a couple of years ago, the
    number I found competent to stand trial versus incompetent was
    roughly equal. About 50-50. I infrequently find that someone is
    insane at the time of the crime.

    Moody: So, the majority of the time you find the defendant is
    sane at the time of the crime?

    Morenz: That is correct.

    Moody: The information you were provided about Bob Moody... What
    was that information and who did you receive that from?

    Morenz: I received the indictment, Grand Jury transcript, motion
    to sever, interview with Clifford Moody, Pima County Sheriff's
    reports, Ewing's report from Los Angeles, Mr. Moody's legal
    requests, testimony of Julie Herrera jail librarian, Psychiatric
    evaluations by Dr. Potts, Dr. Joseph Geffen, records of Maricopa
    County Mental Health Unit, portion of courtroom transcript during
    Mr. Moody's competency hearing of 8-16-94, letter and list of
    attachments from David White dated 6-30-95.

    Moody: Were you provided any information at all from Attorney Dan
    Grills on the defendant?

    Morenz: No, I was not.

    Moody: Do you recall requesting information from Dan Grills on
    the defendant?

    Morenz: I don't recall requesting any information. There was no
    information that appeared to be necessary at the time I did the
    examination.

    Moody: All of the information you used, besides your personal
    interview with Mr. Moody, was provided to you by Mister White, is
    that correct?

    Morenz admitted that he got no input from the defense and that it
    was often his practice to use the info provided by just one side
    or another to make an evaluation on Rule 11, competency and
    sanity.

    Morenz: That is correct. It is my opinion that Mr. Moody is
    competent to stand trial, and there is no evidence that I could
    find that he would not have known his acts were wrong at the time
    of the crime.

    Moody: During your evaluation of Bob Moody did he explain his
    mission to you in detail.

    Morenz: Yes he did.

    Moody: Can you recall that?

    Morenz: ...Mr. Moody indicated that sometime in March of 1994,
    the extrasensory biologic entities informed him  (Judge
    interrupts -- "Was that 1994?") He indicated that the ultimate
    mission for him was not revealed until March of 1994... His
    mission he described was to be found guilty of murder, sentenced
    to death and then to facilitate having that sentence carried out
    by foregoing any appeals at which time after he was given a
    lethal Injection he would be resurrected to life and this would
    prove the existence of the extrasensory biological entities.

    Moody: Did Mr. Moody, during your evaluation, talk to you about
    the government's cover-up of the existence of aliens or
    extrasensory biological entities? Could you recall what he
    stated?

    Morenz: Yes. He described a Trilateral Commission that developed
    around 1918 with Rothchilds and Rockefellers and the intent of
    this commission was to cover-up the existence of extrasensory
    biologic entities.

    Moody: Did Bob Moody state to you that he had been abducted?

    Morenz: Yes you did.

    Moody: How many times?

    Morenz: Multiple times. Dozens of times.

    Moody: Did he state where the aliens had abducted him to?

    Morenz: Yes, to their ship in another dimension.

    Moody: Did he also state to you how they communicated with him?

    Morenz: Yes, the words you used were telesuggestion. Kind of
    telepathic communication, not audible... communication is made
    through special kinds of receptors utilizing a special type of
    electromagnetic energy...

    Moody: Did Bob Moody describe how the ship looked inside?

    Morenz: Yes he did... He described the ship as looking something
    like a small operating room, no windows, gray, everything was
    somewhat fuzzy or moving...

    Moody: Also in your report did you come up with the conclusion
    that Bob Moody was malingering?

    Morenz: Yes.

    Moody: And what's the foundation on that?

    Morenz: There are multiple clues to the presence of malingering
    in your case. First of all you were eager to call attention to
    the range of beliefs you had to the biologic extrasensory
    entities. This is unusual in mental illness. Individuals in the
    throes of a psychotic state are usually not inclined to discuss
    the range of illusions and delusions they may have. The story
    that you provided was far fetched and totally implausible to not
    comport with the vast majority of psychiatric, even severe
    psychiatric problems I have come into contact with or read about.

    (Our panel  of experts says this is true. Most abductees do not
    go to Psychiatrists.)

    Morenz: The form of mental illness was not imitated very well by
    Mr. Moody. There was no impaired relatedness, there was no
    disorganized thinking, in fact he described this extrasensory
    biologic entities and his entire experience with them in very
    intricate detail. He was very logical. It was a very good story.
    He had multiple motivations for his -- multiple kinds of
    explanations, if you will, for his behavior. On the one hand he
    described the extrasensory biologic entities were still
    controlling him. If that were the case, he would be considered
    incompetent to stand trial. He (Moody) described that basically
    the extrasensory biologic entities made him do it so that he was
    insane at the time of the offense. Further he described that the
    entire trial process was entirely unfair so that there would be a
     mistrial. So there was sort of multiple avenues of escape for
    him to relieve himself of responsibility in the accusations
    against him....

    (HERE again Morenz reported the content of a switch in Moody's
    personality but failed to recognize what it meant. Moody believed
    the accusations were against him. THIS was not the same Moody who
    wanted to be executed. Note the inconsistency here -- first he
    says that they made him do it, then he says that there are
    avenues of escape for him to relieve himself of responsibility
    from the accusations against him.)

    Morenz: Additional items which support the probability of
    malingering in Mr. Moody's case is that during my interviews with
    him he attempted to control and dominate those interviews. That
    is very unusual for psychiatric patients. (But, according to Dr.
    Dean, most usual for DID male patients.) They are usually very
    compliant, or if they're very paranoid and psychotic they'll just
    attempt to terminate the interview prematurely. Moody, again
    attempted to control the interview. The other item is that Mr.
    Moody's behavior had another explanation for it other than
    psychosis which was obtaining money for his cocaine dependence
    which by that time was fairly substantial. The other item I
    considered was that psychological testing by Dr. Geffen as well
    as at the Maricopa County Jail observations by the jail team,
    indicated the possibility of malingering and no severe mental
    illness.

    Mr. Moody described the extrasensory biological entities telling
    him what to do. In most cases patients with command
    hallucinations, in other words voices telling them what to do,
    ignore the command.

    (This could be true in most cases, but Morenz didn't know how to
    interrogate a DID patient. He should have asked him if the
    command was inside or outside of him. This would clearly
    differentiate where the commands came from.

    (By this time it had become painfully obvious that Dr. Morenz was
    not familiar with the literature, not even one of the most famous
    cases of DID serial murderers, the Berkowitz case in which there
    were commands similar to the ones Moody described which made him
    kill.)

    Morenz: Mr. Moody's symptoms, the Extrasensory Biological
    Entities and his multiple personalities do not fit typical
    presentations of psychiatric illness.

    (According to the DID professionals we showed this transcript to,
    this is a very naive statement for a person in Morenz's position
    to make. He says that Moody's multiple personalities do not fit
    typical presentations of psychiatric illness. Our panel of
    experts believes that if Morenz had examined him further, probing
    the child states and the angry, rage filled states he would have
    changed his opinion and his diagnosis.

    (A case in point: If an individual says "God made me do it," he
    will probably be considered crazy because God is revered in this
    society. But if someone says the devil made me do, there is a
    question as to whether or not he would be found competent to
    stand trial. Dr. Thomas Szazz has written about this at length
    and claims that this is an excuse, nothing else. So, if "aliens
    made me do it" is the claim, the next thing to determine is are
    the aliens inside of his head.)

    Morenz: They suggest an atypical psychosis which is a good clue
    for malingering, especially in a forensic context. Some of Mr.
    Moody's statements were inconsistent with statements he allegedly
    made to others such as Carlos Logan. Mr. Logan indicated that he
    had complete awareness of his action toward the victims...

    (When the going gets tough, Doctor, the weird turn pro. This
    hearsay was most likely an account of Carlos Logan's interview
    with Moody's killer personality -- Moody the killer, not Moody
    the patient or Moody the lawyer, or Moody the little kid.)

    Morenz: Finally ,visual hallucinations are usually of normal
    sized people. Mr. Moody described "Nordics" as being six to eight
    feet tall and the "Greys" three to five feet tall. Usually the
    visual hallucinations people experience are of other people and
    not extraterrestrial type of beings.

    (According to our panel of experts, Morenz is probably impaired
    and should be reported to the proper supervisory authorities.)
    Moody: So Doctor, a normal hallucination is someone of normal
    size?

    Morenz: Usually.

    (Did he mean to suggest that there were normal hallucinations?
    Moody asked him to read a particular paragraph of his report into
    the record.)

    Morenz: That begins: "Mr. Moody reported that the EBEs could
    manipulate him and his consciousness. He states that knowing his
    ultimate mission in march of 1994, the EBEs were trying to gain
    complete control over him. He stated that one of the ways of
    gaining complete control was by compelling him to use large
    quantities of rock cocaine. He stated that this made him fall
    asleep for almost a week leading up to the time of the alleged
    offenses..."

    Moody: Did Bob Moody also indicate something about his eyesight?

    Morenz: Yes he did. He stated that during his acts towards the
    victims he could see almost 360 degrees on the one hand, however
    at the same time he couldn't hear anything. He went through the
    acts as if (seeing them) through a video camera....

    (If Morenz had experience with DID patients he would know that
    they often describe being out of their body and seeing 360
    degrees as well as not being able to hear anything when they are
    in certain states. Morenz then testified that the EBE's put Moody
    on vacation.

    (Morenz said he found no evidence of a psychological disorder in
    Moody except cocaine dependence. He said he believed that Moody
    was malingering. He said that Moody did state he wanted to be
    found competent and sane. This, again, does not go along with his
    statement that he wanted to get off of the things that he was
    alleged to do. Morenz's conclusions also overlooked the legal
    aspects of an "under the influence of a substance" defense,
    which being under the influence of cocaine would suggest. Morenz
    is clearly wound up to do the State's bidding and send an insane
    person to life imprisonment or death by lethal injection.

    (Morenz stated that Moody's descriptions of the EBE's were
    "farfetched and totally implausible." Yet, these are the same
    descriptions that are found throughout the literature and studied
    in depth at the Alien Abduction Conference held at MIT.
    According to Ted Loman and other UFO experts, there are even
    photographs of these entities released by the governments of
    other countries which are more inclined to let the public in on
    what is going on.

    (Then came the prosecutor's turn to cross-examine the witness.)

    White: Are you saying that you don't believe in the existence of
    aliens?

    Morenz: To date I'm not aware of scientific reproducible evidence
    that such entities exist. The Universe is a very wonderful place
    and I'm sure there are  many phenomena that none of us understand
    or have witnessed yet...

    White: Did the defendant report multiple personality disorder?

    Morenz: He also reported having multiple personality disorder. He
    enumerated four of the personalities and then went on by saying
    there were more personalities he didn't want to get into, but his
    descriptions of his multiple personality disorder did not fit the
    conventional description of multiple personality.

    White: What do you mean by that?

    Morenz: Usually the definition includes people who alternately
    have one personality then another gain control of the individual.
    In Mr. Moody's case he said that predominantly one of the
    personalities was in control and the others didn't really
    manifest themselves very often. Nor was there any evidence that
    the other personalities had distinct different personalities.
    There wasn't handwriting evidence of different kinds of speech
    between the personalities, different kinds of dress, different
    kinds of emotionality, which is what you see with a typical
    multiple personality. He also indicated that all the
    personalities were totally aware of one another. Usually there is
    less awareness of one personality for the other...

    (Again Morenz shows his ignorance about DID's. There often is a
    presenting personality -- not necessarily one who is in control.
    The one in control can be a persecutor personality such as the
    devil or a previous perpetrator, something like an alien. There
    was plenty of evidence of Moody's handwriting which both the
    prosecution and the defense had. It showed a variety of different
    handwritings, all supposedly Robert Moody's. Morenz's reference
    to dress is vague. Moody was stuck with prison orange by the time
    Morenz interviewed him. Besides, dress changes take place more
    often with female DID's.

    (The different kinds of emotionality was seen by people attending
    the hearings and by some of those who interviewed Moody in his
    cell. There was a child personality and a hostile personality
    which were easy to differentiate. As far as Moody's claim of his
    total awareness between his personalities, our experts don't
    think that is correct. He probably does have some personalities
    that are co-conscious, and he might believe that he knows all his
    parts, but that's only a belief.

    (The doctors job was to bring out the hidden personalities, the
    ones which caused the problems. But Dr. Morenz was not
    experienced with DID males who are high functioning, let alone
    with ones which have an alien killer personality inside them.)

    White: So there are people who truly have a mental disease that
    makes them act in a way of a multiple personality?

    Morenz: There certainly are some that fit that description.

    White: But those that truly fit that disease act in a certain way
    and he did not act in that way?

    (The estimates of how many DID's are out there in the United
    States has grown from a handful in the 1960's to the millions
    today. Most DID's remain misdiagnosed due to the ignorance of the
    profession.

    (Our panel of experts tells us that DID's do not act in any
    certain way at all. They act in every way possible and are
    usually brilliant, like Robert Moody, and extremely good at
    manipulating others.)

    Morenz: Not at all... he didn't act in that way.

    (There is a bad joke among mental health professionals who work
    with DID's. It goes something like this:

    Question: "How does a DID act?"

    Answer: "Like you and I until they switch."

    Question: "And when do they switch?"

    Answer: "When you're not looking."

    (At the end of Morenz's testimony, Moody did not redirect. Had he
    not been acting as his own attorney, and had there been a
    competent team  -- a lawyer and an MPD expert -- at his table,
    Morenz's testimony would have presented a great opportunity.

    (A number of M.D.'s and PHD's think that mental health
    evaluations should be left entirely out of the legal process.
    They say, try the case on the evidence and forget the questions
    of competency and sanity. After hearing the testimony of some of
    these "mental health experts" one might have a tendency to agree.
    But without any or better ground rules to establish competency
    any accused person might find himself in the position of Robert
    Moody, declared competent, then put in the crazy position of
    defending himself.

    (The saying, "a defendant who represents himself, has a fool for
    a client," is well known. In this case, this defendant
    represented himself, got his crazy outcome -- two counts of
    guilty, by using a whole internal team of fools to present his
    case.

    (Many were disappointed that the aliens were not called to
    testify.)

    OTHER POINTS THE MOODY CASE SERVES TO ILLUSTRATE:

    Bowart asks for comments on this information from professionals.
    He also asks the FOTF membership for help in researching the
    following:

    THE LAW'S UNWILLINGNESS TO CONFRONT THE ALIEN QUESTION

    Any newspaper clippings or court records of the other convicted
    murderers who have claimed, as Robert Moody has, that they were
    "possessed by aliens" which made them commit murder. Anything
    which might contribute to an overview of these cases to show the
    similarities to Moody's case would be most useful. Any records of
    the court cases involving "alien possession" and aliens that have
    been channeled are also welcome. Anything which might show a
    pattern of belief, if not of law.

    TURNING POINT OF BELIEF -- COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

    A history of the surveys of public opinion shows a growing belief
    in UFO's and extraterrestrial visitations. One of the latest
    polls shows that 50% of the American public believes in the
    reality of extraterrestrial visitations. Send in your examples
    please.

    Any clippings or documentation which shows a possible emerging
    trend in the development of an "alien legal defense". Any
    evidence or articles on the pattern of reports of physical
    evidence from UFO landings and alien encounters which show that
    they are real is balanced by equal and opposite plausible
    explanations of why they are not real. Anything on the number of
    hoaxes which, it is reported, are small. Recent examples of the
    U.S. government being caught in "disinformation" or outright lies
    about UFO encounters. Government threatening witnesses for the
    purpose of shutting them up in order to create the effects of
    cognitive dissonance.

    GOVERNMENT STUDIES OF TELEPATHY AND ESP

    Evidence that the CIA has funded research into ESP, telepathy,
    and most recently "remote viewing". Evidence that the cryptocracy
    has, at the same time, funded a debunking campaign of its own
    positive results.

    We're looking for solid scientific evidence which suggests that
    there could be such a thing as telepathy -- thus giving some
    credence to those who've claimed telepathic communication with
    aliens . Any clips which shows telepathy would be the alien's
    favorite form of communication.

    We also need evidence of "channeled" alien information which may
    fit the Moody story.

    CONTACTEES VS ABDUCTEES

    Any new information to complete a history of alien encounters
    from the early "contacts" to the "abductees."

    Any supporting documentation on The Report from Iron Mountain.

    The question is raised: To what extent does the government
    orchestrate the UFO phenomenon?

    MOODY'S STORY AS AN EXPRESSION OF THE PLAN

    If the cryptocracy has a plan to spoon feed the public, little by
    little, allowing them access to more and more information about
    the hidden truth that we are not alone in the universe, and that
    we've been contacted for centuries if not millennia by hundreds
    of different alien races, and that telepathy -- mind to mind
    communication -- is the intergalactic language, and that we
    humans are descendants of one race or several similar races of
    intergalactic civilizations who have lost their birthright to the
    stars and to the oneness of the cosmos, then Moody's story could
    be part of their plan to educate us. Your comments please.

    SERIAL KILLERS AND MASS MURDERS

    What do serial killers who have been molded by the military have
    in common? Is there a pattern to these killings? What is the
    government's liability in all this? If the Pentagon is going to
    make killers of ordinary men, shouldn't it unmake them before
    returning them to civilian life? What changes need to be made in
    Federal Torts Laws?

    DISSOCIATIVE DISORDER INSTITUTIONALIZED

    We need to look at "need to know" compartmentalization and the
    rogue elephant aspects of the National Security State, the
    history of Nazi research in mind control and its
    institutionalization as information control in an information
    age.

    POLITICS OF DISSOCIATION

    We must examine the infighting of the mental health
    professionals. Where do their ideas come from and how do new
    ideas become accepted? What evidence do we have that The False
    Memory Spindrome Foundation is an intelligence backlash -- a
    limited hangout to help keep the secrets of
    compartmentalization? What new evidence do we have of
    government "spychiatrists" who created the technology for
    planting false memories suddenly revealing ( fifty years too
    late) that false memories can be implanted by hypnotists, and
    in the normal course of psychotherapy?

    Moody filed a motion for a new trial on November 9th. His
    sentencing is scheduled for late January 1996. His phone use has
    been restricted. He needs contributions to get a diagnosis.
    Psychiatrists are charging $350 per hour for jailhouse
    interviews.

    W.H. Bowart is the author of the seminal work OPERATION MIND
    CONTROL. Published internationally in 1978, it was reissued by
    the Freedom of Thought Foundation in a revised and vastly
    expanded limited numbered Researcher's Edition in 1994.

    Information on ordering videotapes of the trial, can be
    obtained through Freedom of Thought Foundation, P.O. Box 35072,
    Tucson, Arizona 85740-5072.

    NOTE TO MEMBERS: Drop the editor (Tom Kirby) a note letting him
    know what issues you did not receive in 1995. All subscriptions
    end with this issue.

    Freedom of Thought Foundation P.O. Box 35072, Tucson, Arizona,
    85740-5072 - E-mail:

    VIDEOS

    q 1. An Overview of Ritual Abuse, Mind Control and Dissociation,
    W.H. Bowart, Randy Noblitt, Mark Phillips, Alan Scheflin. The
    opening discussion of the CULT RITUAL ABUSE TRAUMA BASED MIND
    CONTROL AND DISSOCIATION; A Multidisciplinary Dialog and
    Educational Symposium held March 23-26, 1995 at the Omni Hotel,
    Dallas Texas, sponsored by the Society for the Investigation,
    Treatment and Prevention of Ritual and Cult Abuse (SITPRCA). 2
    hrs. $39.95

    q 2. Secrecy and Manipulation -- the "Occult" Barriers, Linda
    Blood. Author of THE NEW SATANISM, speaks of her involvement with
    the Temple of Set and events which led to the writing of her book
    "THE NEW SATANISM". Video taped at the SITPRCA Conference. 1
    hr.$29.95

    q 3. The Rosetta Stone to the Unconscious, Mark Phillips and
    W.H. Bowart. Bowart discusses NLP and demonstrates several
    techniques with the audience to illustrate how "body memory"
    works in programming. Phillips relates these harmless techniques
    to more insidious forms of mind control involving electroshock
    "anchoring". Videotaped at the SITPRCA Conference. 2 hrs. $39.95

    q 4. CIA Mind Control Inside Out, Cathy O'Brien and Mark
    Phillips, present the story of Ms. O'Brien's lifetime of abuse by
    the CIA and other government agencies and her subsequent
    "deprogramming" by Phillips. They cover a great deal of detail on
    the cryptocracy's mind control efforts and name names of high
    ranking government officials. Videotaped at the SITPRCA
    Conference. 2 hrs.$ 39.95

    q  5. The Language of the Unconscious -- Alien, Ritual and
    Government Mind Control Survivor Reports, W.H. Bowart. A workshop
    in which the author of OPERATION MIND CONTROL goes over his
    research. This includes some research which has never been
    published comparing ritual abuse survivor reports and alien
    abductee reports. Videotaped at the SITPRCA Conference. 2 hrs.
    $39.95

    q 6. Utilizing Cult Accessing Techniques in the Evaluation and
    Treatment of Ritual Abuse Survivors, Randy Noblitt. Dr. Noblitt
    presents valuable information for therapists on the codes, cues
    and triggers to access programmed individuals. Part two is TRAUMA
    MEDIATED CONDITIONING. We suggest you purchase both these tapes.
    Videotaped at the SITPRCA Conference. 2 hrs, $39.95.

    q 7. Trauma Mediated Conditioning, Learning, and Altered States
    of Consciousness, Randy Noblitt. Dr. Noblitt gives some of the
    codes, cues and triggers of satanic ritual abuse and presents an
    overview of "mudras" and phrases he has learned from programmed
    survivors. Videotaped at the SITPRCA Conference. 1.5 +- hrs.
    $39.95

    q 8. Surviving the Backlash Against the Mental Health Profession,
    Randy Noblitt, Jan MacLean, John Kiker, Michael Moore. This panel
    of doctors and therapists discusses the dangers of healing
    programmed people in light of the attacks on healers from such as
    the False Memory Spindrome Foundation, which many think is a
    front organization for the cryptocracy, aimed at striking terror
    in the hearts of therapists. Videotaped at the SITPRCA
    Conference. 2 hrs. $39.95.

    q 9. A History of Mind Control: What We Can Prove, What We Can't,
    Alan Scheflin. The author of TRANCE ON TRIAL and THE MIND
    MANIPULATORS, Dr. Scheflin presents a fascinating slide show of
    the history of mind control from the earliest days of shamanism,
    through Freudian times, through electroshock and lobotomy to the
    present "cordless" mind control forms. Videotaped at the SITPRCA
    Conference 2 hrs. $39.95

    q 10. UFO'S AND MIND CONTROL, W.H. Bowart with Ted Loman and the
    hosts of UFOAZ. This includes an hour of accused "alien" serial
    murderer Robert Moody manifesting multiple personalities in his
    jail cell for the first time. Moody wants to get the lethal
    injection because the "Nordic aliens" have assured him that he
    will be resurrected on television. 2 hrs. $39.95 . Single 2 hr
    tapes $39.95, 1 hr tapes $29.95 plus S& H. Charter members of the
    FREEDOM OF THOUGHT FOUNDATION may take an additional 15%
    discount.

    FREEDOM OF THOUGHT FOUNDATION VIDEO TAPE ORDER

    Send check or M.O. made out to the Freedom of Thought Foundation,
    P.O. Box 35072, Tucson, Arizona, 85740-5072. Include $3 S & H
    for each tape ordered.

    While orders will be processed as quickly as possible. Please
    allow 6 weeks for delivery just in case.

    "There is no "alien" defense for murder in this county,"  Judge
    Howard Hantman said. declared.

    FREE THINKING

    This edition of FREE THINKING was edited by Tom Kirby and is
    published exclusively for members of FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
    FOUNDATION, at P.O. Box 35072, Tucson, Arizona. 85740-5072.
    Charter Membership $100. Annual E-mail subscription $25:
     -- U.S. post sub: $50 ( Firstclass
    domestic snailmail.)

    REPEAL THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT NOW!

    [END]
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    VERICOMM BBS filename: [fltr10.zip] = [fltr10.txt]
    ================================================================

    To subscribe to the MindNet Journal:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics, will  be
    accepted with the author's statement of permission to  publish.
    The editor reserves the right to accept or reject  for
    publication. Send articles for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA, and the International Committee for
    the Convention Against Offensive Microwave Weapons,  POB 58700,
    Philadelphia, PA 19102-8700 USA.

    Please visit the Freedom Of Thought Foundation home-page at:

    .

    ================================================================

        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
        |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
        ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
        |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  SM
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        || VERICOMM  BBS 510.891.0303 / MindNet : vericomm@c2.org ||
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||