### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 22
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    Notes:

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the publisher, The San Francisco Examiner.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Contributing Editors: Walter Bowart
                          Alex Constantine

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    ================================================================

    FEMINIST TREASON AND INTELLECTUAL FASCISM

    by Stephanie Salter

    From the San Francisco Examiner, April 7, 1993.

    (C) 1993 San Francisco Examiner.

      I fear that the current sad and destructive impulse to see
    abuse in every home, and to manufacture memories where none
    existed, is creating a dangerous new set of problems. To raise
    this concern does not make me anti-feminist anymore than
    criticizing some policies of my government makes me
    anti-American.
                                        - Carol Tavris

      More than three months since social psychologist Carol Tavris
    criticized the dangerously sloppy thinking that has become
    common in popular incest survivor literature, the letters are
    still coming in to the New York Times from outraged feminists and
    angry mental health professionals.
      A lifelong feminist author, whose works include the
    illuminating, "The Mismeasure of Woman," Tavris is no longer a
    "good" feminist. In an essay, she criticized an element of the
    women's movement that she believes has gone way off track.
      To some feminists, that is a capital crime.
      Last December, about a month into my full-time research for The
    Examiner's six-part series on recovered memory therapy, I began
    to dread the same fate.
      I saw Gloria Steinem's glowing praise on the front of a
    disturbingly simplistic and misleading self-help book for incest
    survivors, and I knew that I was about to break rank and become a
    "bad" feminist. I was about to question.
      Before I began work on this series -- about adults who have
    remembered alleged childhood incest or abuse for the first time
    while in therapy -- I believed a lot of things I no longer do.
    Among them: women and children never make up false accusations of
    incest; most scientific studies "prove" whatever they say they
    prove, and you can't be a good feminist if you criticize your own
    movement.
      In believing these things -- or in never even questioning them
    -- I and people like me have helped create an intellectual
    fascism. We have let our legitimate anger and concern blind us to
    a couple of basic facts.
      There are no absolutes, no 100 percent pure, utterly infallible
    anythings in this life -- not in patriarchal oppression, not in
    accusations of child sexual abuse, not in "the word of women."
      Victimhood is like a powerful mind-altering drug -- a little
    of it can go a long way toward providing you with insight and
    enlightenment; a lot of it can warp your reason, poison your
    heart and ultimately crush your spirit.
      Something is wrong when it is feminist treason to even suggest
    that all accusations of incest or ritual abuse might not be true.
    Or to acknowledge that mothers and fathers are being brutalized
    by false accusations of incest. Or to wonder aloud whether any
    woman or man can become truly "empowered" by hate.
      And yet, people like Tavris who have questioned and wondered
    have been dismissed as part of the "backlash" against feminism
    and the incest survivor movement, or they have been labeled
    anti-woman, anti-child, even anti-Christ.
      But, as troubling as these last months have been for me as a
    feminist, they also have been encouraging. In interviews and
    through reading, I have encountered some of the most prodigious
    minds and noble hearts of our time -- and they belong to women
    who walk, talk and think a kind of big-picture feminism that I
    hope will survive well into the 21st century.
      Professor and psychoanalytic therapist Janice Haaken at
    Portland State University. Psychology and law professor Elizabeth
    Loftus at the University of Washington. Journalists Wendy Kaminer
    in Massachusetts, Debbie Nathan in Texas and my own colleague and
    co-author of this series, Examiner reporter Carol Ness.
      Carol Tavris is one of those women, too.
      A week before she was to be ripped to shreds in the Times'
    letters section, she told me something that has served as a kind
    of beacon throughout the months of doubt and dismay.
      "How can you be a good feminist and attack a sister?" I asked.
      "You don't attack a sister, you attack her ideas," said
    Tavris. "I have to believe that our movement is mature enough to
    see the difference. Ideas have consequences, and, as feminists,
    we have to look at the consequences. We have to ask of each and
    every one, 'Does this serve women or harm women?'"
      I am no longer certain of many things, but I do know this:
    Intellectual fascism does not serve women. And any movement that
    cannot survive questions and criticism is already dead.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    VERICOMM BBS filename: [mn122.zip] = [mn122.txt]
    ================================================================

    To subscribe to the MindNet Journal:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. Send articles for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    Please visit the Freedom Of Thought Foundation home-page at:

    .

    ================================================================

        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
        |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
        ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
        |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  SM
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        || VERICOMM  BBS 510.891.0303 / MindNet : vericomm@c2.org ||
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||