### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 32
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    Notes:

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author/publisher.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Associate Editors: Walter Bowart
                       Alex Constantine
                       Martin Cannon

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    ================================================================

    RESONANCE

    Newsletter of the Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group
    (SIG)

    Judy Wall, Editor, 684 C.R. 535, Sumterville, FL 33585 USA

    Sample of Newsletter $4.00, Subscription (4 per year) $15.00.

    Number 28, May 1995

    Pages 17 to 26.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

                           SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY

                              by Judy Wall

    BACKGROUND

       Synthetic telepathy is a term used to describe the beaming of
    words, thoughts, or ideas into a person's mind by mechanical
    means, specifically, some type of electromagnetic transmitter,
    similar to a radio or television broadcast, operating in the
    microwave frequency band.

       Humans have been hearing voices in their heads since the
    beginning of time. Everyone hears their own voice, of course, in
    everyday thought patterns. We hear other people's voices in our
    imagination and in our dreams. But to hear voices originating
    from outside the head when there is no other person present is to
    cause a dilemma. Is it our imagination? Is it the wind or some
    other natural sound that we are misinterpreting? (The calls of
    many animals can sound amazingly human-like. Bird calls, such as
    that made by a peacock can sound like a human in distress. Some
    sound like the wail of a baby.)

       But suppose the sound heard is definitely a human speech
    pattern? The Bible records the story of young Samuel, under the
    tutelage of Eli. One night Samuel is awakened from his sleep by a
    voice calling his name. He runs to Eli, saying, "Here I am."  The
    priest dismisses the boy. It happens again. It happens a third
    time. This time Eli says to Samuel, "Go lie down; and it shall
    be, if he call thee, that thou shalt say, Speak Lord, for thy
    servant heareth."  The voice called to Samuel again, and he
    answered as he had been directed. And the Lord spoke to Samuel.

       This is not the only case recorded. The Bible is replete with
    accounts of humans hearing and responding to voices in the air.
    But identifying the source of the voice is of major importance.
    Is it the voice of God, and angel, a devil, an animal (recall the
    story of Balaam being rebuked by his ass), or other humans
    playing tricks on that person?

       Persons who claim regularly to communicate with unseen beings
    have been treated as saints and seers to be revered; witches or
    warlocks to be burnt at the stake; or just plain crazy to be
    ignored, locked up, or perhaps subjected to electroshock therapy,
    a kind of torture used to convince the patient that it is better
    to discontinue such claims. The latter attitude is the one
    currently held by medical authorities in today's world.

    ENTER THE DRAGON: THE HIGH SOPHISTICATION OF MODERN ELECTRONICS
    TECHNOLOGY

       The first, and perhaps only, officially reported scientific
    experiment documenting a case of synthetic telepathy - the one
    that everyone makes reference to - cannot be found in the
    literature. Here's what happened.

       In 1961 Allen Frey, a free-lance biophysicist and engineering
    psychologist, reported that human can hear microwaves (1). This
    discovery was dismissed by most United States scientists as being
    the result of artifact (outside noise). In 1976 the Defense
    Intelligence Agency attributed the discovery to Soviet
    researchers. (See Keeler article, Resonance #23, page 7 under
    "Disinformation".)

       The more technical description of the experiment is described
    by James C. Linn (2). "Frey...found that human subjects exposed
    to 1310 MHz and 2982 MHz microwaves at average power densities of
    0.4 to 2 mW/cm2 perceived auditory sensations described as
    buzzing or knocking sounds."  (also described as clicks or
    chirps.)  "The peak power densities were on the order of 200 to
    300 mW/cm2 and the pulse repetition frequencies varied from 200
    to 400 Hz...Frey referred to this auditory phenomenon as the RF
    (radio frequency) sound. The sensation occurred instantaneously
    at average incident power densities well below that necessary for
    known biological damage and appeared to originate from within or
    near the back of the head."

       Further testing revealed that two requirements were necessary
    for the subject to hear the microwave induced sound: good bone
    conduction and the ability to hear acoustic energy above 5
    kHz..."  Don Justesen (3) reports that there is a sizeable
    minority of people, including himself, who cannot hear microwaves
    under direct radiation. Lin also noted, "Additional data
    indicated that perception of microwave induced sound was
    primarily a function of the peak power density and secondarily
    dependent on pulse width."

       Skeptics were finally convinced by a study of behavioral
    sensitivity to low-level microwave radiation in rats by Nancy
    King in 1971. (4)

       By 1975 the introduction to a paper by A.W. Guy and others
    begins "One of the most widely observed and accepted biologic
    effects of low average power electromagnetic (EM) energy is the
    auditory sensation evoked in man when exposed to pulsed
    microwaves." (5)

       That paper's aim was to determine the threshold of the sound-
    inducing phenomenon as 1) a function of pulse power or energy,
    pulse shape, and carrier frequency 2) the locus of the action,
    that is, whether it is initiated at a central or peripheral site,
    and 3) whether it is caused by direct action of the EM field on
    the nervous system or if it activates the auditory system (the
    ear and related parts that normally conduct sound to the brain).

       After a battery of tests the following conclusions were made:

              *  the threshold for microwave pulse-evoked auditory
    sensations or responses in both humans and cats is related to the
    incident energy per pulse, with values of approximately 20 uJ/cm2
    for cats to 40 uJ/cm2 for humans for pulses less than 30 usec
    wide,

              *  the microwaves seem to interact more with the high-
    frequency portion of the auditory system,

              *  cochlear destruction resulted in total loss of all
    evoked potentials due to microwave and acoustic stimuli,
    indicating the microwave auditory effect is exerted in the same
    manner as conventional acoustic stimuli,

              *  the most likely mechanism of EM field interaction
    appears to be conversion of EM energy to acoustic energy due to
    thermal expansion,

              *  a prerequisite for interaction with the material is
    that the conductivity be sufficiently high and the frequency
    proper to permit a penetration of energy and loss over an
    appreciable fraction of the volume when the object is exposed to
    a microwave pulse.

       Another study conducted by C.K. Chou and others (6)
    investigated the possibility of the acoustic systems as the site
    of interaction between electromagnetic waves and biological
    tissue in producing the microwave hearing phenomenon.
    Demonstration of microwave- induced cochlear microphonics (the
    mechanical movement of cochlear hair cells) in laboratory animals
    confirmed this.

       But scientists wanted to know exactly HOW the microwaves
    induced the reaction. Guy and others showed that at frequencies
    where the auditory effect can easily be detected, microwaves
    penetrate deeply into the tissues of the head. Absorbed energy
    causes rapid thermal expansion (at the microscopic level) which
    produces strains in the tissue. This produces an acoustic stress
    wave that is conducted through the bone to the cochlea. From
    there it proceeds in the same manner as in conventional hearing.

       Simple or slow heating of the tissue by microwaves does not
    give rise to the auditory effect. Only microwaves that have a
    short rise time, that is, square waves that cause a rapid rise in
    the microenvironment's temperature will produce the stress wave.

       Several other mechanisms to describe this EM-biological
    interaction have been advanced, but the above theory, called the
    thermoelastic theory, is thought to be the most probable because
    calculations for acoustic pressure are much higher for this
    method than for the others. Do you really want me to describe the
    other theories too? No, I didn't think so.

    WHERE DOES SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY FIT IN?

       Justesen reports that A.W. Guy had his father, a skilled
    telegrapher, send messages in Morse code via the microwave
    auditory method. This might be useful in certain situations.
    Still, it is a far cry from "hearing voices".

       The credit for performing an actual experiment in which
    audible voices were communicated via microwaves is given to
    Joseph Sharp and Mark Grove. Justesen reports that they recorded
    on tape the spoken words for the single syllable numbers one
    through ten. "The electrical sine wave analogs of each word was
    then processed so that each time a sine wave crossed zero
    reference in the negative direction, a brief pulse of microwave
    energy was triggered. By radiating themselves with these
    voice-modulated microwaves, Sharp and Grove were readily able to
    hear, identify, and distinguish among the nine words. The sounds
    heard were not unlike those emitted by persons with artificial
    larynxes. Communication of more complex words and of sentences
    was not attempted because the averaged densities of energy
    required would approach the current 10 mW/cm2 limit of safe
    exposure."

       The 1976 Defense Intelligence Agency report mentioned
    previously (under Keeler, "Disinformation") also credited the
    Soviet scientists with making the Sharp-Grove discovery. Keeler
    says that this item "found its way into at least one
    Congressional report and was printed in a number of newspapers
    and professional journals". Motivation for such a disinformation
    campaign was to coerce Congress and the American public into
    authorizing and allocating money for projects to "catch up" with
    the Russians.

       References in the literature citing Sharp and Grove refer to a
    paper, "Generation of Acoustic Signals by Pulsed Microwave
    Energy" (7) that, from the title, would indicate that this is the
    above mentioned classic experiment. But it is not. It is
    apparently a next-step type experiment, in which sounds are
    generated by microwave pulses when aimed at absorbers
    (carbon-impregnated polyurethane microwave absorbers, and
    aluminum foil is used). They do not make reference in this paper
    to the above experiment, not even citing it in their references,
    as would be usual in referring to a previous work.

       Why, we might ask, did they NOT publish such a startling
    discovery? How did Justesen come by the information to relate it
    in his paper? Is it a reliable piece of information?

       Justesen references it in his notes as received by "personal
    communication, September 28, 1973".

      The answer to the question, why did they NOT publish their
    discovery, is contained within Justesen's paper, although in an
    oblique way. Remember that after the U.S. discovered the
    microwave beam directed at the American embassy in Moscow, Milton
    Zaret was brought in to evaluate the situation. But, Justesen
    says about the incident, "American intelligence agents were
    understandably curious, but they did not want their Soviet
    counterparts to know that the microwave bombardment had been
    detected. Enter the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), an
    arm of the Executive Office that specializes in getting fast
    answers to far-out questions that may bear on national security.
    Agents for ARPA contacted Joseph C. Sharp, former director of
    research in experimental psychology at the Walter Reed Army
    Institute of Research, and an electronic engineer, Mark Grove,
    who began to put together at Walter Reed what is now one of the
    best equipped laboratories in the United States for studying
    biopsychological effects of microwave radiations."

       Sharp and Grove were in the employ of the U.S. Government,
    which undoubtably told them to keep their mouths shut about the
    experiment. But, perhaps they had already communicated their
    findings to Justesen before the order to be quiet. Justesen
    merely calls his source a "personal communication". That could
    mean verbal or written. It is my guess that it was a written (or
    possibly tape-recorded) message that the two could not later deny
    having made (as in the case of Dr. Narut, who was forced to
    recant his remarks that the U.S. Navy was conditioning men to
    become assassins). At any rate, Justesen, published the incident,
    and it is repeated in Lin's book. (Some cite Lin as the
    reference.)

       Lin discusses three potential medical applications of the
    microwave-induced hearing phenomenon (including use of the more
    mundane examples of clicks, chirps, and buzzes, not just the
    exotic "voice communication"):

              *  one is for distinguishing in cases of hearing loss
    between types of deafness, whether air or bone conduction.

              *  another is for eliciting sensory evoked potentials.
    He cites work by Rapin (8) in detecting residual hearing in
    multiply-handicapped infants, and the prescribing of hearing aids
    for them when they might have been assumed to be completely deaf.

              *  In the same category, Sohmer (9) used this method to
    locate tumors which exert pressure on or near the junction of the
    auditory nerve and the brain stem.

              *  the last being the application of transmitted
    digital codes or use of the Sharp-Grove experimental discovery in
    communications. He adds, "The capability of communicating
    directly with humans by pulsed microwaves is obviously not
    limited to the field of therapeutic medicine."  Perhaps he had
    already heard of the government's interest in developing this
    discovery. The question is, Why HAVEN'T we heard of research in
    this area, research with bona-fide medical applications?

    SOME POSSIBLE CLINICAL PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING CASES OF CLAIMED
    SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY

       There is a common cry among people who claim to be victims of
    government conducted "mind control" operations - that no one will
    believe them, that there is no way to prove the voices they hear
    come from the outside.

       Groups which are organized to be victim's advocates need a way
    to sort out the victims of genuine mind control experiments from
    others who claim to be harassed, but who, in fact, may be victims
    merely of their own distorted personalities (paranoia,
    schizophrenia, whatever). Perhaps only one in ten of claimed
    government harassment victims is truly such; perhaps only one in
    fifty, or one in a hundred. Who knows? But if only a single claim
    be true, it needs to be documented.

       Not only is it important to sort out the "true victims" from
    others for the sake of evaluating and combatting the situation,
    it is necessary to be able to provide objective proof of the fact
    to third parties in order to elicit help, awareness of the
    problem, and legislative action against it.

       The above reported research offers some options along these
    lines. I respectfully submit the following measures be used in
    evaluation and identifying causes of illegal mind control
    experiments and harassment:

              1. Victim's advocate groups should hire a medical
    doctor or scientist sympathetic to the cause to evaluate cases.
    Individuals claiming abuse should be referred to this person.

              2. How does the victim describe the voice he/she hears?
     Is it like the artificial voice described in the Sharp and Grove
    experiment? An indication that there is an unreal or unnatural
    sound connected to the voice would be a very strong response to
    indicate an artificial mechanism involved.

       Of course, there will be those who say, "It sounds like a
    normal voice," or "It sounds like my own thoughts, but I know it
    isn't. Isn't it possible that advances have been made in the past
    twenty years to update the technology to make it sound more like
    a normal, human voice?"  Yes, of course, it is possible. Still, a
    computer- like voice would certainly put an evil or fearful
    connotation to the thought messages. But the government may have
    decided to try to simulate more natural sounds, for its own
    purposes. Whether they would be successful is unknown. Don't
    forget, that for most practical purposes, a specific word message
    is unnecessary. The easier-to-achieve objective of manipulating
    EMOTIONS (feelings of fear or panic) or PHYSICAL BODY FUNCTIONS
    (nausea, diarrhea weakness, headache) could very well serve their
    purposes in the majority of cases, especially crowd control.

              3. The sensory evoked potential test is a strong
    candidate for absolute proof/disproof of a claim. (Refer to the
    Rapin work above.)  A victim may not be hearing clicks or buzzes,
    but if he is hearing a voice, noises, ANYTHING AT ALL, it will
    automatically evoke a neurological response that CAN be detected
    and CANNOT be bypassed. If someone is hearing microwave induced
    sounds or voices, it WILL show up on this EEG test.

       One may protest that the Voices can hear and see what is
    happening; that they are aware of the subject's behavior and
    conversations, and consequently will cease whenever someone tries
    to detect them. I doubt that they can see what is happening at
    all times; an electronic camera/eye might be installed in his
    house or on the car, but hardly on his person. Or perhaps the
    victim only is harassed while at home, the microwave being beamed
    at his house. Therefore, testing in an office or hospital setting
    would show no unusual results. (This situation is common to many
    ailments. Two options are available here. Set up a stress test to
    induce the condition, or take the test equipment on site when the
    problem occurs. The second option is the one that could be used
    here.)  There are portable electroencephalograph (EEG) machines.

              (a)  The above objection could be overcome by arranging
    for "house calls". The doctor could have a system worked out for
    situations of this type. The office visit might include a moment
    when the doctor excuses himself for some reason, hands the victim
    a paper with the words DO NOT READ ALOUD, DO NOT DISCUSS THIS
    WITH ANYONE, NOT EVEN THE DOCTOR OR ASSISTANTS. The paper would
    include instructions as to how to secretly contact the doctor
    when the voices are strong in order that an EEG recording might
    be taken at the victim's house.

              (b)  Or the Victim might be fitted with a telemetry
    apparatus to relay the EEG recordings via radio transmission back
    to the clinic.

       Cesar Caceres (10) describes several such medical telemetry
    devices. The first transmission of heart sounds was accomplished
    in 1921 by the U.S. Army Signal Corps from ships to shore.

       C.C. Breaksell and C.S. Parker in England, 1949, used
    frequency modulation (FM) for the radio transmission of a human
    electroencephalogram (EEG) (11).

       Although the EEG is usually described as more difficult to
    record than the electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) due to its lower
    voltage output, thereby necessitating more sensitive
    instrumentation and greater amplification, its transmission in
    the form of radio waves is apparently simpler. "H.W. Shipton (12)
    described a system that had a frequency response of 2 to 100 cps.
     Although this is not sufficient to transmit the clinical ECG
    which requires equipment with a frequency response to DC (0 cps),
    the system was satisfactory for such phenomenon as the EEG. It
    used a transmitter fashioned after the design of Thomas and Klein
    in their article, "How to Construct a Miniature FM Transmitter"
    (13). The receiver could be any domestic commercial set..."

       Readers might find a more recent article in the February
    Popular Electronics, "Build an FM Stereo Transmitter" easier to
    obtain. This Fred Blechman article (14) refers to a kit offered
    by Ramsey Electronics and is obtainable for a cost of about $55.
    Easy to build, it is designed for amateur or advanced electronics
    enthusiasts. (I have one.)

       "A. Kemp and W. Storm van Leeuwen developed a two-channel EEG
    radiotelemetry system which has been the basis for development
    work by others. Instead of FM, it uses a different system of
    coding the signal, PWM."(16)

       The need for radiotelemetry of ECGs during exercise inspired
    N.J. Holter in 1957 to design an elaborate system. His 80 pound
    transmitter was strapped to the subject's back (enough to cause
    stress right there!). He later developed a tiny transmitter that
    the patient could carry in his pocket. (The Ramsey transmitter,
    mentioned above, is 5" X 5" X 1" and weighs less than one pound.)
     The patient's ECG was transmitted to a nearby briefcase that
    contained a receiver and a tape recorder. The tape could be read
    later. Holter also developed a method for rapidly scanning
    several hours of tape-recorded tracings. The tape could be played
    to an oscilloscope or paper write-out. If adapted for a simple
    single or dual channel EEG, this would be an ideal set-up for a
    Victim to use in recording auditory evoked potentials induced
    during sessions of mind control "voice" harassments.

       These systems were designed mainly for short distance
    telemetry, perhaps within a thousand yards of the transmitter.
    But long distance telemetry devices have been developed as well,
    even to the point of transmitting to Earth from space. This was
    first recorded in 1958 by A.G. Kousnetzow (17).

       In all of these examples, the transmitter would be fixed or
    attached to the subject's scalp. But there is another method for
    placement of the electrodes: intracerebral, that is, the
    electrodes are embedded within the skull. This system is reported
    by Jose Delgado (18). He follows the method of Mark and Ervin
    (19), and incidentally, one of the patients monitored was "L.K.,
    a 35 year old white male design engineer..."  Non other than
    Leonard Kille, and you know how he felt about this method of
    brain monitoring. (See Resonance #27, p.13-17, "Terminal Man" by
    Paul Bartch.)  Best we should pass up this method.

       Undoubtedly there have been many advances made in perfecting
    the radio-frequency systems. The references used here are given
    so that you can see how they developed and the fact that they
    evolved from simple, basic circuits to more advanced technology
    (present systems use computers to help read the results).

              4. Victim claims he has a receiver implanted in his
    body. Conventional X-rays should detect any metal parts. If
    negative, the CAT SCAN or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could
    be used for further search for plastic parts. MRI cannot be used
    on patients with metal implants. Cost of MRI is about $450.

       There you have it folks. A review of how synthetic telepathy
    was discovered, how it works, ways to detect it and objectively
    record it. Not a perfect solution, but hopefully a start towards
    monitoring, validating, and correcting the problem of involuntary
    mind control experimentation and harassment of innocent Victims.

                               REFERENCES

    (1)  Frey, A.H. "Auditory System Response to Radio Frequency
    Energy", _Aerospace Med._ 32:1140-1142, 1961.

    (2)  Lin, James C., _Microwave Auditory Effects and
    Applications_, Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL, USA,
    1978.

    (3)  Justesen, Don R., "Microwaves and Behavior", _Am.
    Psychologist_, 30:391-401, 1975.

    (4)  King, N.W. "The Effects of Low-Level Microwave Irradiation
    Upon Reflexive, Operant, and Discriminative Behaviors of the
    Rat", unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Kansas,
    1969.

             King, N.W., Justesen, D.R., and Clarke, R.L.,
    "Behavioral Sensitivity to Microwave Radiation", _Science_,
    172:398-401, 1971.

    (5)  Guy, Arthur W., Chou, C.K., Lin, James C., and Christensen,
    D., "Microwaved-Induced Acoustic Effects in Mammalian Auditory
    Systems and Physical Materials", _Ann. NY Acad. Sci._,
    247:194-218, 1975.

    (6)  Chou, C.K., Galambos, R., Guy, A.W., and Lovely, R.H.,
    "Cochlear Microphonics Generated by Microwave Pulses", _J.
    Microwave Power_, 10:361-367, 1975.

    (7)  Sharp, Joseph C., Grove, H. Mark, and Gandhi, Om P.,
    "Generation of Acoustic Signals by Pulsed Microwave Energy",
    _IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech._, Vol. MTT-22, pp.583-584,
    1974.

    (8)  Rapin, Isabella and Graziana, Leonard J., "Auditory Evoked
    Responses in Normal, Brain Damaged and Deaf Infants",
    _Neurology_ (Minn,), 17:881- 894, 1967.

    (9)  Sohmer, H., Feinmessen, M., and Szabo, G., "Sources of
    Electrocochleographic Responses as Studied in Patients With Brain
    Damage", _Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol._ 37:663-669, 1974.

    (10) Caceres, Cesar A., ed., _Biomedical Telemetry_, Academic
    Press, New York, London, 1965.

    (11) Breaksell, C.C., and Parker, C.S., "Radio Transmission of
    the Human Electroencephalogram and Other Electrophysiological
    Data",  _Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol._ 2, 243, 1949.

    (12) Shipton, H.W., "A Simple Telemetering System for
    Electrophysiological Data", _Electroencephlog. Clin.
    Neurophysiol._ 12, 922, 1960.

    (13) Thomas, D.E. and Klein J.M., "How to Construct a Miniature
    FM Transmitter", _Electronics_, 32, 80, 1959.

    (14) Blechman, Fred, "Build an FM Stereo Transmitter", _Popular
    Electronics_, February 1995, pp. 33-36, 91.

    (15) Holter, N.J. and Gengerelli, J.A., "Remote Recording of
    Physiological Data by Radio", _Rocky Mt. Med. J._, 46, 749, 1949.

    (16) Kamp, A. and Storm van Leeuwen, W., "A Two Channel EEG Radio
    Telemetering System", _Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol._,
    13,803, 1961.

    (17) Kousnetzov, A.G., "Some Results of Biological Experiments in
    Rockets and Sputnik II", _J. Activation Med._, 29, 781, 1958.

    (18)  Delgado, Jose M.R., "Intracerebral Radio Stimulation and
    Recording in Completely Free Patients", _Psychotechnology,
    Electronic Control of Mind and Behavior_, Schweitzgebel, Robert
    L. and Schweitzgebel, Ralph K., eds., Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
    Inc. NY, 1973, pp. 184-198.

              Reprint from _The Journal of Nervous and Mental
    Disease_, The Williams and Wilkins Company, Vol. 147, 34, 1968.

    (19) Mark, V.H. and Ervin F. "The Relief of Chronic Severe Pain
    by Stereotactic Surgery," _Pain and the Neurosurgeon: A Forty
    Years' Experience_, Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1969, pp.
    not given.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn132.txt]
    ================================================================

    To subscribe to the MindNet Journal:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
    FTP Archive site:

     [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

    MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. Send articles for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    Please visit the Freedom Of Thought Foundation home-page at:

    .

    ================================================================

        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
        |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
        ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
        |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  SM
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303 / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  ||
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||