### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 25b * [Part 2 of 3 parts]
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    Notes:

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author/publisher.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Contributing Editors: Walter Bowart
                          Alex Constantine

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    ================================================================
    [Continued from part 1]

    She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she
    had assiduously "courted" this individual for several months,
    without success; and that she had been stealing his newspapers on
    a regular basis. (On one occasion, she handed him a week's
    accumulation of those papers, claiming that they had been left
    outside the door of another apartment. Her reason for collecting
    and saving the newspapers which had not been delivered to her
    directly is unknown.)

    *  Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers;
       and comments by strangers which appear intended to evoke
       "paranoid" reactions.

    In this context, we note that several individuals have reported
    confrontations with "homeless" people who, on closer examination,
    were found to be fastidiously clean, though garbed in offbeat
    fashion (wigs included). The same "eccentric" confronted two of
    the individuals in contact with us, at separate distant
    locations. He is reported as having feigned mental illness on
    both occasions, and as having apparently enjoyed creating a
    public scene.

    *  Entries into the individual's residence, during
       late-night hours while he/she is sleeping, and/or during
       the day when the individual is elsewhere.

    In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their
    visits, such as relocating objects, or by committing petty and
    not-so-petty acts of vandalism. In two cases, the burglar's
    "calling card" was to slaughter caged pets, leaving the mangled
    carcasses inside their locked cages.

    In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence
    and left a packet of crack cocaine behind as a "calling card."
    Our contact in this case -- an individual who has no criminal
    record and no history of experimentation with drugs -- is also
    being harassed (stalked) by a police officer of her community.
    One of his recent acts was to "frame" her with a drug possession
    charge. After pulling her off the road (a frequent pastime) and
    subjecting her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he
    conveniently managed to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight
    feet away, in front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet
    with his fingers and then charged her with Possession. Our
    contact found the packet of crack cocaine in her apartment
    shortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling
    her case that the police officer had smudged his only piece of
    evidence with his own fingerprints. It would appear that someone
    is interested in correcting that police officer's oversight.

    In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount
    of money has been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment,
    within hours after she had withdrawn the money from her bank.
    There was no obvious signs of entry into her apartment. The
    police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce
    evidence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case is an
    anomaly. Money is usually not stolen. Documents appear to be the
    preferred objects of theft, when theft occur.)

    In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with
    "exploding" bulbs, many of which were 'Made in Hungary.'  The
    lightbulbs are now in our possession.

    *  Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive
       nature.

    In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding
    accompanied the sudden onset of sever gastrointestinal
    disturbances. One of these individuals abruptly terminated the
    deteriorative process simply by changing the locks on her door.

    *  Sleep disruption/deprivation

    This is achieved by means of overt and electronic harassment.
    Sleep deprivation, as a tactic, invariably surfaces when the
    targeted individual begins exhibiting a strong emotional and
    irrational response to the other forms of harassment.

    *  Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles

    Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment
    campaigns -- slashed tires, smashed windows, oil drainage, oil
    contamination, destruction of electronic components and batteries
    (frequently involving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages,
    often within range of weapons research facilities and/or other
    microwave emitters); and suddenly failed brakes and clutches
    (possible involving anti-traction polymers, which are also in
    DoD's "non-lethal" weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have
    also been reported.

    Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated
    immediately after having the oil changed by reputable mechanics.
    In one of these cases, the oil viscosified (thickened) while the
    individual was driving through a remote rural area. Her car
    ground to a halt. Getting the "gunk" cleaned out of her engine
    proved to be an expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents are
    also lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council as serving
    "non-lethal" strategic purposes -- a topic discussed in Part I of
    this publication. Had this woman been assaulted while awaiting
    help in the said isolated area, the "non-lethal" attributes of
    viscosification agents might have required redefinition.)

    Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring
    basis have abandoned driving all together -- an objective
    apparently sought by their tormentors as a means of increasing
    their isolation.

    *  Staged accidents.

    The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types
    of experiences. One individual, for example, was tailgated at a
    high rate of speed by two vehicles, while concurrently being
    threatened with a gun by one of the vehicles' occupants. Two
    others narrowly avoided what happened to be deliberately
    attempted collisions by drivers who quickly sped away from the
    scene. One avoided three attempts in four days at being run off
    the road. One survived by being run off the road in two incidents
    within a one-week period, which resulted in "totaling" of her two
    vehicles. Another narrowly avoided being crushed into an
    expressway retaining wall, on four occasions, by an off-duty
    metro bus, as well as, within the same time frame, being "fried"
    by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances which
    subsequently repaired themselves. It should be noted that, in
    some of these cases, "accidental" deaths do occur.  One
    individual in contact with us reported that his mother drove off
    a cliff to her death, during a period when he was researching
    evidence that a still-respected, high level State Department
    official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet Government
    during World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her car
    had undergone routine maintenance. She was returning from a
    dental appointment when the accident occurred. Witnesses state
    that it appeared that she had suddenly stepped on the accelerator
    before running off the road. The accident served to terminate
    this person's research project.

    We also look into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO,
    who was killed when the brakes on her tractor failed. We are
    informed that she had been collecting affidavits from persons who
    believe they are the targets of government harassment and
    experimentation when her "accident" occurred. We are also
    informed that these affidavits have disappeared.

    Suicides might also qualify as "staged accidents," particularly
    where "plausibly deniable" government involvement has been
    surfaced. We are currently looking into the recent suicide of a
    man in Trappe, PA, who, as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and
    CIA to intervene in his case. We have copies of that early
    correspondence. The man, a former U.S. Army radar technician, had
    a highly technical and -- given date of his correspondence --
    "precocious" grasp of the experimental objectives apparently
    being sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence
    that he had wanted to believe that the Soviets were conducting
    these experiments. The FBI and CIA, of course, did not intervene.
    We are informed that members of his family have also been targets
    of this experimentation.

    *  Isolation of the individual from members of his/her
       family -- virtually assured when highly focused forms of
       electronic harassment commence.

    The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children
    in the family become targets for apparent purposes of
    intimidation. This situation has been reported in eight of our
    cases, to date.

    One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing
    electronic harassment focusing on her children) killed one child
    in an effort to protect her from further pain.(2) It appears
    that lasers were being used in this individual's case. The
    targeting intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to
    report the harassment, which she believed to be U.S.
    Government-sponsored. It became even more deadly when, in a
    further show of defiance, she then called the representative of
    the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S. Government's war in the
    Middle East as "hypocritical." She is now hospitalized in a
    midwestern facility, where, apparently, the experimentation is
    now continuing.

    (That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate
    number of complaints of electronic harassment are beginning to
    surface. It is also within range of a U.S. Air Force base which
    houses a "super secret" research facility. We are currently
    looking into information that spouses and children of persons
    employed on that USAF base may be the targets of involuntary
    experimentation involving direct-energy weapons technologies.)

    Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by
    an employee of a local power company that, if she valued the
    lives of her children, she would drop her public opposition to
    the company's installation of high power lines. Since receiving
    that threat, the individual's 11-year-old daughter has been
    reduced to extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent
    hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which cannot be
    diagnosed. It is also apparent to this individual that her
    three-year-old son is on the receiving end of externally-induced
    auditory input. (DoE figures prominently in this case.)

    *  Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by
       termination of the individual's employment, and
       compounded by expenses associated with the harassment.

    The majority of those now in contact with the Project --
    educated, white-collar professionals -- have lost their jobs.
    Termination of employment in many of these cases involved
    prefatory harassment by the employer and co-workers, which
    coincided with the other overt forms of harassment discussed
    above.

    The overt harassment tactics are being described as recurrent,
    non-sequential and overlapping. As noted above, the overt
    harassment continues even after the electronic harassment
    commences.

    FAILURE OF "ESTABLISHMENT" SUPPORT SYSTEMS

    Those individuals who have tried to resolve their respective
    situations through resort to "establishment" channels have
    invariably encountered the following:

    *  Apathy, indifference and/or professed helplessness on the
       part of members of Congress and state legislators.

    *  Dismissal and/or attempted discrediting by psychiatrists
       who refuse to include the terms, "government harassment,"
       "mind-control experimentation" and "torture" in their
       vocabulary.

    Several individuals, thinking the psychiatrists might help to
    alleviate the extreme stress associated with their harassment,
    and accorded "treatment" which clearly pointed to corporation
    between their psychiatrists and members of the U.S. Intelligence
    community. One such psychiatrist, in fact, bragged about being a
    member of the U.S. Intelligence "inner circle," informing our
    contact that her harassment was a "Pavlovian Experiment,"
    intended to "break" her.

    *  Lack of interest, courage and/or competency in legal
       circles.

    Few of those in contact with us have been able to acquire legal
    assistance -- not helped by their straitened financial
    circumstances. Most have found that few attorneys are willing to
    risk their careers by pursuing cases involving what is believed
    to be government-sponsored harassment or experimentation.

    A few attorneys reportedly engaged in egregious violations of
    codes of professional conduct, in what appear to have been
    deliberate efforts at sabotaging our contacts' cases. Subsequent
    attempts by two individuals at obtaining legal redress were met
    with stonewalling, obstruction, and high-level denials of
    wrongdoing.

    *  Refusal of the mass media to address this topic, except
       in those cases where suspected experimentees have been
       driven to committing murder or suicide.

    Such cases (particularly where an individual has claimed to be a
    victim of CIA-directed mind-control involving auditory input) are
    treated by the press as "curiosities." An example of this is the
    individual who shot a Navy officer outside the Pentagon in
    mid-1991.(3)  He claimed to be a victim of CIA mind control,
    involving auditory input. According to the press, "he worried
    'about being run over by trains'..." (ref. incident described in
    following paragraph). He is now permanently residing in a
    psychiatric facility. He, being institutionalized, and others in
    the preliminary stages of his predicament are no longer of
    interest to the media.

    Another recent case which received short-lived press attention(4)
    involved a woman diagnosed as having "suffered from periods of
    confusion" who climbed over a fence onto a railroad track and
    walked into an oncoming train. Because the incident occurred in a
    community in which an unusually large number of mind-control
    experiments have been reported, we are looking into the
    situation. The woman was reportedly "under a physician's care"
    because of her "periods of confusion." A family member described
    the physician to this investigator as "a psychiatrist." We find
    that the alleged "psychiatrist" is a General Practitioner,
    otherwise non-accredited, practicing out of his home. We find
    also that the suicide may have been witnessed under
    peculiarly-timed circumstances by an alleged "homeless" person
    who has since disappeared. Needless to say, our interest has been
    whetted.

    *  Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.

    The tendency of local police is to dismiss an individual's
    complaints of government harassment as the ravings of a
    "fruitcake." In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that
    one police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment.
    Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality of the
    situation, hesitate to intervene in cases involving what they
    believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain
    police officials did attempt to intervene, based on what they
    perceived to be evidence of a systematic harassment/illegal
    surveillance campaign. Absent a clear mandate to prosecute
    "stalkers" acting under the aegis of U.S. Intelligence, the
    police obviously had their hands tied.

    *  Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases
       brought to our attention thus far.

    FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large
    number of requests for assistance from "mentally disturbed
    persons" who believe that they are being "zapped by radio waves"
    and/or "are hearing voices..." "from Mars, that is."

    In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in a angry, defensive and
    bizarre fashion when our contact briefly alluded to PROJECT
    SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT
    SLAMMER is a CIA-funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral
    scientist, which explores the "mental make-up" of alleged
    security risks, along with their family members and close
    associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and
    Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)

    Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman's approach
    in this case was to politely and redundantly explain that the
    law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI's intervening in
    this individual's case. What she briefly pointed out that the
    surveillance activities might fall under the purview of PROJECT
    SLAMMER, the spokesman's response was to abruptly and angrily
    declaim, "You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! You
    don't know if that is a state police surveillance!...or a local
    police surveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation!
    You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! [etc.,
    etc.]!"

    It was apparent from that response that the FBI was at least
    acknowledging the existence of a surveillance, if in somewhat
    emotional fashion. The individual in question subsequently
    furnished acquired evidence to the local police, who made it
    clear that they are no participants in the surveillance which,
    based on the evidence, pointedly suggest that our contact is the
    target.

    *  Refusal of inability of the ACLU and Amnesty International
       to intervene.

    Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from
    persons claiming to be the targets of some type of electronic
    harassment. An ACLU spokes-woman characterized the complaints as
    appearing to be rational, except in a few cases. The complaints
    are not being investigated, she said, because of "limited
    resources." We have to wonder, of course, why the ACLU could
    recently find resources to defend the rights of prostitutes and
    the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases
    such as we are now pursuing.

    Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that
    they could not intervene in her case because their focus is on
    the U.S. Government's treatment of prison inmates. While
    incarceration does appear to be one sought-for objective in this
    harassment/mind control experiments, we would like to think that
    protection by such organizations as Amnesty International can be
    achieved beforehand.

    RELATED COVERT METHODOLOGIES

    The persons engaged in this harassment tend to become careless,
    possibly the result of arrogance born of an assumption that
    nobody can stop them. "Harassees" who have noted this
    carelessness have furnished us with the following insights into
    the covert side of these harassment activities.

    *  Impersonation of military officers.

    One individual found that her next-door neighbor had claimed to
    be a military intelligence officer, assigned to a space
    technology unit in California, on year-long "TDY" (temporary
    duty) in the individual's apartment building. It is subsequently
    determined that this alleged officer is not in fact a member of
    the U.S. Armed Forces; and that he had used this bogus status to
    acquire information from a major defense contractor. Our contact
    is certain that this person's apartment was used as a base of
    harassment operations.

    *  Use of concealment devices, and emitters detected to date.

    Several individuals and supportive associates report having seen
    some of the electronic devices being used in these harassment
    campaigns.

    One saw electronic equipment concealed inside a false-front
    upright piano being moved out of her apartment building. She had
    previously noted that all of her surrounding neighbors had
    identical upright pianos in their apartments, not one of which
    was ever played.

    Other suspected participants in the harassment may be concealing
    devices in oversized stereo speakers, measuring approximately 5'
    in height x 3'x3'. Several of our contacts have noted the
    presence of such speakers in adjacent dwellings.

    One individual was told by a resident of her building that her
    upstairs neighbor has "microwave ovens" in his bedroom and
    livingroom, but none in the kitchen.

    Another individual, while standing outside, looked in her
    neighbor's window to find that her bedroom appeared to be the
    target of a gray-colored, elongated box-like device, measuring
    approximately 1' in length x 5" in height (side view). A large,
    black-framed lens protruded from the end facing her window. The
    electrical cord, if any, was not visible from that vantage point.
    The equipment was being operated by a stranger in a three-piece
    suit, who appeared to be quite startled to find that he was being
    observed.

    Another was given strong reason to believe that portable emitters
    are being concealed in oversized, extremely heavy, sometimes
    expandable "briefcases" for use in places of public assembly,
    such as meeting halls, auditoriums and restaurants. Smaller
    varieties are apparently being used on aircraft.

    On a 3-hour flight, our contact noticed that the man sitting next
    to her seemed peculiarly intent on keeping the attache case on
    his lap propped open with his fingertips, while he gazed
    "blankly" into the distance during the entire flight. She
    believed that she was being electronically harassed while on a
    flight (a common complaint, in most of these cases now being
    investigated).

    Our contact reports that, when they prepared to land, the man
    opened his attache case to hastily check his contents, thus
    disclosing the presence of a raised, built-in "concealment
    device" covering the entire bottom surface of the attache case.
    The low-slung, lift-off cover did not appear to be capable of
    concealing a laptop computer. At one point during the flight --
    apparently aware that his "reverie" was inviting attention, --
    the man devoted approximately ten minutes to scribbling assorted
    entries on a sheet of lined paper, which he had placed on top of
    the briefcase two hours previously. He devoted roughly ten
    minutes to the effort (obviously preferring a pen to a laptop
    computer). His attache case remained ajar during this process.(5)

    One individual reports that mobile emitters may be installed in
    certain oversized, non-attributed medical emergency vehicles,
    possibly for the eventual use in civil disturbances. Her
    unsuccessful attempts at following the "medical emergency"
    vehicle which had surfaced in her case ended with a high-speed
    chase.

    The phony military intelligence officer, when recently moving out
    of our contact's apartment building, was found to possess a
    device which resembles an oversized microwave oven, measuring
    approximately 4' in width x 2' in height x 2 1/2' in depth. A
    subsequent examination of his apartment revealed that he had
    tapped numerous additional lines into existing, in-house
    telephone and TV cables; and that he had gone to great pains to
    conceal a major excavation into one wall abutting the
    "harassee's."  Judging from photographs taken immediately after
    this person's departure, the wiring suggests that he was hooked
    by modem into a computer network, and at least of some of his
    electronic equipment was situated in a large walk-in closet,
    again abutting the "harassee's."

    When the alleged officer moved out, his equipment (except for the
    oversized "microwave oven") was packaged in boxes identifying the
    contents only as stereo components. During his year-long
    residency in this building, no sounds emanated from his apartment
    to indicate use of this "stereo" equipment.

    *  Use of modified license plates and vehicle look-alikes.

    Some individuals have noted that their neighbors' vehicles are
    periodically replaced (during peak periods of harassment) by
    others which qualify as "rough look-alikes." These tags on the
    latter closely resemble those on the homeowners' vehicles, with a
    difference being noted in only one digit or one letter. These
    modified plates appear to have been acquired through State DMV
    channels, thus suggesting government/intelligence agency
    involvement.

    In one case, where the individual has obtained police assistance,
    tracking of one plate surfaced evidence of a drug connection. The
    plate rapidly disappeared from the vehicle in question, to be
    replaced by another, again bearing a one-letter modification.

    *  Use of neighbors' residences as bases of operation and
       training.

    One individual recently saw a team of "technicians" in the house
    behind hers -- a consequence of the team's failure to close the
    curtains and/or dim the lights when puttering around the kitchen
    at 5:00 in the morning. The three men (strangers to this
    individual, all stripped down to their T-shirts) behaved as if
    they were unaware that they were being watched. Their observer
    had long suspected that this house was being used as a base of
    electronic harassment operations. The harassment had been going
    on throughout the night.

    To provoke a response from these men, the individual eventually
    commented aloud on their activities. They responded immediately
    by turning the lights off and switching to the use of
    flashlights. Why they failed to close the curtain is unknown.

    This individual is working with the police in a effort at ending
    this surveillance and harassment, with mixed results.

                                 ***

    Another individual, paying a surprise visit to the apartment
    upstairs, overheard one of her own telephone conversations being
    played on a tape recorder inside that apartment. Lacking both a
    legitimate pretext to enter the apartment and the support of the
    building's management personnel and/or the police, she was
    prevented from pursuing this further. Her upstairs neighbor is
    purportedly employed by Stanford University Hospital, in
    Stanford, CA.

    The target of surveillance and harassment in this case is still
    also trying to recover from the effects of exposure to
    potentially lethal doses of radiation, administered in the 1970's
    by a dangerously "incompetent" dentist. This might explain the
    involvement of alleged Stanford University Hospital personnel in
    her situation.

    The government is on record as having experimented on unwitting
    U.S. citizens with radioactive materials during the 1970's (and
    earlier).(6) The House Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce based
    their investigation into this matter on a 30-year accumulation of
    documents maintained by the Department of Energy. Under the
    circumstances, it will come as no surprise if it is ultimately
    found that DoE has been involved in this woman's surveillance and
    harassment.

                                 ***

    Another individual paid a surprise visit to the apartment
    immediately below hers, in the attempt to identify the source of
    tremendous racket in her ventilation system. Standing outside the
    door, she could hear an individual moving around, a short
    distance from the door. She also heard the sound of rustling
    paper and the steady, sonar-like "pinging" of some type of
    electronic device. In response to her repeated knockings on the
    door, the person inside simply stopped moving about. The sound of
    rustling paper (perhaps a printout of some type) and the steady
    "...pin-ng!...pin-ng!" sound continued. The occupant of this
    apartment resumed moving about only after it was (incorrectly)
    believed that our contact had departed the area. Typically, this
    situation could not be pursued further.

                                 ***

    All of those who live in apartment buildings report unusual
    patterns of occupancy in the apartments surrounding their own;
    i.e., upstairs, downstairs and on all sides. They have become
    quite convinced -- if only because of the highly focused nature
    of the systems being experienced -- that these surrounding
    apartments are being used as bases of operation. Perhaps this
    encirclement facilities studies of holographic human telemetries;
    or perhaps it is intended to increase the prospect of brain
    entrainment by electronic means ("entrainment" being one
    published objective sought in mind control experiments).(7)

    In examining this situation more closely, a number of individuals
    have found that surrounding apartments are either permanently
    vacant, for unknown reasons, or that they have been "sub-let" by
    the original occupants to persons who are purportedly unknown to
    the buildings' management personnel. In one case, the surrounding
    renters all list two residences in the local telephone book. No
    one lives in the apartment building in question, though the
    address is identified as one of the renters' places of residence.
    One individual suspects that the original occupants of apartments
    surrounding hers have been simply relocated to other apartments
    in the same (large) building. Another suspects that an adjacent
    apartment, which has been permanently rented to the U.S.
    Government for use by "visitors" is also being used as a base of
    operations.

    One individual found that an immediate neighbor's housemate has
    the same (unusual) name of a university professor who has engaged
    in extensive research on behalf of the government, studying the
    bioeffects of exposure to microwave radiation.

    *  Use of informants/agents provocateurs, frequently members
       of the opposite sex.

    As noted in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
    Interior and Insular Affair's draft report, Alyeska Pipeline
    Service Company Covert Operation (July 1992), the Wackenhut
    Corporation's Special Investigations Division adopted this tactic
    when pursuing Alyeska's critics.

    A number of individuals in touch with us report a range of
    experiences with new "friends" who -- apparently posing as
    confidants -- used acquired personalia to abruptly end these
    "friendships" under deliberately degrading and humiliating
    circumstances. When taken in the context of ongoing surveillance
    and harassment, these exercises appear intended to heighten
    emotional trauma, perhaps to provoke an uncontrolled response
    and/or to enforce isolation.

    *  Misuse of covert intelligence personnel (possible former
       case officers).

    One individual while under contract to the U.S. Government,
    properly reported what he believed to be an approach by a hostile
    intelligence service. Within a few weeks, alleged U.S.
    Intelligence officers contacted this individual. In addition to
    questioning him about his background, these alleged intelligence
    officers asked that he keep in constant contact with them,
    particularly when planning to travel.

    It soon became apparent that the alleged intelligence officers
    were intent only on forcing this individual to report to them as
    directed, and to account for his activities. He was not asked to
    assist the U.S. Government in any form of intelligence operation;
    he was not asked to execute any form of secrecy affirmation
    statement acknowledging the classified nature of these meetings;
    nor was he told why these meetings -- involving a total of seven
    alleged case officers -- were necessary.

    When he began to balk at a continuation of this process, one of
    his "handlers" conveyed a threat, suggesting that his continued
    compliance might be "enforced." Finally, when this individual
    adamantly refused to corporate further, massive overt harassment
    commenced and is currently ongoing.

    [Continued to part 3]
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn125b.txt]
    ================================================================

    To subscribe to the MindNet Journal:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
    FTP Archive site:

     [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

    Index of back issues: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. Send articles for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    Please visit the Freedom Of Thought Foundation home-page at:

    .

    ================================================================

        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
        |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
        ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
        |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  SM
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303 / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  ||
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||