### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 25a * [Part 1 of 3 parts]
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    Notes:

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author/publisher.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Contributing Editors: Walter Bowart
                          Alex Constantine

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    Editor's Note:

    The Electronic Surveillance Project is no longer in operation
    as of Sept. 1995.

    ================================================================

                Association of National Security Alumni
                   Electronic Surveillance Project
                           P.O. Box 13625
                     Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625
                           (301) 608-3625

                             SUPPLEMENT
                            November 1993

    Through a mere preliminary investigative finding, only, Microwave
    Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation has invited criticism
    in two areas in recent months; viz., (1) No substantive proof has
    been furnished in this document which confirms that
    directed-energy technologies exist; and (2) The persons whose
    circumstances are discussed in this publication may simply be
    mentally unbalanced.

    In December 1992, when Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control
    Experimentation was published, the U.S. Government
    representatives routinely took the position that directed-energy
    technologies were nothing more than mere figments of physicists'
    imaginations, still on the drawing boards. Shortly following
    publication of this report, information concerning these
    technologies began to appear in some noteworthy organs as, The
    Wall Street Journal, Defense News, Aviation Week & Space
    Technology, Tactical Technology, Defense Electronics and, most
    recently, The Washington Post.

    In a flurry of activity in these past 10 months, directed-energy-
    based surveillance and anti-personnel systems have suddenly
    leaped off of physicists' drawing boards into the world of
    reality, thus obviating the criticism, it would appear, that the
    attached publication concerns non-existent technologies.

    Indeed, directed-energy technologies appear to have evolved at
    such a rapid rate that they are now being promoted as the "Final
    Solution" to crime -- preliminarily, at a classified conference
    sponsored by the Los Alamos National Laboratory, hosted by the
    John Hopkins Applied Physics, and supported by the American
    Defense Preparedness Association.

    Clearly, given this conference, data concerning the efficacy of
    acoustical, how-power microwave, laser, ELF/RF weapons and
    "psychotronic" systems is sufficient to allow for their now being
    promoted as tools for law enforcement. What is note worthy in
    this sudden flurry of activity is that no one has bothered to ask
    the following very basic questions:

    (1)  Where is the test data being obtained?

    (2)  What, so far, has prevented this government and its
         contractors from testing these technologies on U.S.
         citizens under involuntary circumstances?

    Absent answers to -- or government interest -- these questions;
    and because the symptoms experienced by those now in touch with
    this Project parallel those reported in the media as being the
    effects of directed-energy targeting, we conclude that no
    restraints have been placed on those charged with the development
    and testing of directed-energy systems; and the U.S. citizens are
    indeed being experimented upon under involuntary circumstances.

    It is in this context that we note that Los Alamos strongly
    urges, in their brochure, that "industry" attend the
    aforementioned classified conference, since "(i)ndustry,
    particularly, will benefit from a more precise understanding
    of...operational constraints regarding [these] technologies."
    Perhaps "industry," as a minimum, will also be made to understand
    that a failure to comprehend that said constraints will
    ultimately lead to vigorous, civil rights-based prosecutions.

    As to the alleged mental illness of the persons in touch with
    this Project, it should be noted that government-sponsored
    stalking and harassment, mind control experimentation and simple
    torture can indeed produce symptoms which might be regarded as a
    form of mental illness. Deliberate terrorization can take a toll.
    Mental illness caused by government-sponsored terrorization,
    however, does not invalidate that terrorization.

    It should be noted that The American Psychiatric Association --
    in its various revisions of the Diagnostic and Statistical of
    Mental Illness -- seems to have conveniently omitted all
    reference to harassment, stalking, mind-control experimentation
    and torture as a case for mental illness. (The DSM is a
    psychiatric profession's diagnostic "bible.") The APA's refusal
    to acknowledge the impact of terrorization upon the human psyche,
    even given the publicity stemming from the Church Committee's
    findings in 1975, raises serious questions about the validity of
    psychiatry as a profession in this country, not to mention, the
    APA's ethical intent, in the long term.

    Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation, published
    in December 1992, furnishes an overview of complaints received
    from 25 individuals as of that date. During these 11 intervening
    months, the complaints received by this Project have more than
    tripled. While the majority of these "experimentees" reside in
    the United states, a number of virtually identical complaints
    have also been received from England, Canada and Australia. It
    would appear that these activities are also ongoing on the
    European Continent, and the former Soviet Union. Connections
    between this global pattern of activity and the objectives of the
    so-called New World Order remain to be determined.

    All categories of types of complaints being received by this
    Project have also changed since publication of this report.
    Survivors of certain satanic cults (alleged to protect the
    interest of government and military "political satanists" in this
    country; former Vietnam-era "programmed assassins," prison
    inmates, and so-called "UFO abductees" are now reporting an
    array of experiences (and symptoms) which are remarkable similar
    to those addressed in this report. Experimental drugs, induce
    auditory input, vicious overt harassment, attempted psychiatric
    discrediting (unless the experimentee dutifully claims to be a
    UFO abductee), and an extremely painful array of
    externally-induced symptoms are included in this shared panoply
    of experiences.

    The impression created by these burgeoning complaints is that
    mind-control experimentation in this country is being pursued in
    at least five specific areas. Evidence is more recently surfacing
    that unwitting government employees may qualify as yet another
    category of experimentee -- those employees, in particular, who
    are experiencing the effects of so-called "sick buildings."

    It has been suggested that the long-term objective of all this
    experimentation is to develop a system by which all (surviving)
    citizens of this country can be monitored and tracked by a
    sophisticated, perhaps satellite-based cybernetics system.
    Certainly some of the research being dedicated to "mapping of the
    brain" shows this potential. We are in receipt of preliminary
    information which points to magnetic resonant imaging as being
    critical to process. Our information is that far too many
    physicians are urging patients to undergo unnecessary MRIs --
    patients whose short-lived, if painful symptoms surfaced in
    so-called "sick buildings." We intend to look into this
    situation, of course.

    The Electronic Surveillance Project is currently dedicated to
    helping victims of directed-energy harassment and experimentation
    to survive their respective ordeals until such time that Congress
    can be persuaded to intervene. We do believe that polite,
    precautionary comments concerning "a more precise understanding
    of...operational constraints" should be delegated to government
    agencies which have a primary role in development of these
    technologies.

                                /Original signed/
                                JULIANNE MCKINNEY
                                Director,
                                Electronic Surveillance Project

    The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by federal
    employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever
    present -- and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding
    scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we
    must be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy
    could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological
    elite.

    [President Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961]

    "Covert actions are counterproductive and damaging to the
    national interest of the United States. They are inimical to the
    operation and effective national intelligence system, and
    corruptive of civil liberties, including the functioning of the
    judiciary and free press. Most importantly, they contradict the
    principles of democracy, national self-determination and
    international law in which the United States is publicly
    committed."

    [Credo of the Association of National Security Alumni]

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

                        MICROWAVE HARASSMENT
                                AND
                     MIND-CONTROL EXPERIMENTATION

                        by Julianne McKinney

                Director, Electronic Surveillance Project
                 Association of National Security Alumni
                           December 1992

    Whither the KGB?

    In February 1974, Georgetown University's Center for Strategic
    and International Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight
    of dissenters in the Soviet Union, and on a means by which the
    U.S. Government might most effectively intervene. highlights of
    these discussions are reported in "Understanding the Solzhenitzyn
    Affair: Dissent and its Control in the USSR," (CSIS, 1974).

    KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these
    discussions. It was noted that the KGB's success depended on the
    extensive use of informant networks and agent provocateurs; and,
    following Brezhnev's rise to power, on the use of drugs and
    psychiatrists for further purpose of manipulation and control.
    Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related
    tactics were also cited as serving KGB purpose. Participants in
    the conference agreed that the KGB's obvious intent was to divide
    and isolate the populace, to spread fear, and to silent
    dissenters.

    Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed
    precisely these same tactics on a recurrent basis. The Church and
    Rockefeller Committee Hearings in the mid-70's purportedly put an
    end to these practices. Based on recent developments, it would
    appear that the CIA's and FBI's Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
    COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and
    Vice-President-level Hearings) were instead merely driven
    underground. We are now in contact with a total of 25
    individuals, scattered throughout the United states, who firmly
    believe they are being harassed by agencies of the U.S.
    Government. Others have been brought to our attention whom we
    will be contacting in the future. The majority of these
    individuals claim that their harassment and surveillance began
    in 1989.

    The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns
    bear a striking resemblance to those attributed to the CIA and
    FBI during Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The only
    difference now is that electronic harassment and experimentation
    also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.

    The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death
    rattle, and the KGB no longer poses the threat which purportedly
    served to justify the U.S. Government's resort to such operations
    as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been
    reduced to an increasingly distant memory.

    Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations
    in this country suggest that the KGB, as an institution, was
    never the real threat. A KGB "mentality," which is underlying
    pragmatic contempt for civil liberties, appears, instead, to have
    been the driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO,
    and the operations now being reported to us.

    The KGB "mentality" is a matter of personal predilection, not
    ideology. Its objective is power and control, regardless of human
    cost. It is a corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on
    fear, conformity and government funding.

    Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these
    complaints of government harassment and experimentation with an
    admitted "high degree of caution."  We are no longer skeptical.
    The growing numbers of independent complaints and the
    similarities between those complaints cannot be ignored. Under
    the circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a
    "mentality," the KGB appears to be accomplishing more in "burying
    this country" from within, than it could ever have hoped to have
    achieved as an institution. It would appear that this country has
    a serious problem on its hands which needs to be resolved.

    Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July
    edition of the association's publication, Unclassified,
    preliminarily addresses the complaints brought to our attention
    as of July 1992. Our objective, as noted, was to weigh the
    legitimacy of those complaints in terms of the directed-energy
    technologies reportedly involved. Part II discusses the overt and
    covert patterns of harassment identified as a result of our
    investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to
    limit the success of such operations in the future, by according
    them widespread publicity.

    In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor
    their privacy and because our investigations have not been
    completed. Part II, like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our
    focus is on the similarities of the complaints being received --
    similarities which Federal and State legislators, the courts, the
    FBI, local law enforcement agencies, the medical and psychiatric
    professions, and organizations such as the ACLU and Amnesty
    International have so far chosen to ignore.

    We frankly find it curious that more attention and creditability
    is being accorded purported victims of UFO experiences and
    spectral visitations, than to persons who complain of systematic
    harassment and experimentation by the U.S. Government, involving
    technologies which the U.S. Government is only now grudgingly
    admitting to possess. These complaints require investigation. In
    due course (and provided financial support is obtained), we hope
    to be able to acquire the technology and supportive medical
    expertise to substantiate the claims being made. We also hope to
    alter the institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence can be
    trusted. History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise.

    PART 1 - THE PROBLEM SURFACES

    [Reprinted form the June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol.
    IV, No. 3), published by The Association of National Security
    Alumni, Washington, D.C.]

    The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline
    University's "Public Administration" report on the resolution of
    MKULTRA cases in 1988. Although the shocking details of medical
    ethics abuses by the U.S. and Canadian governments were amply
    detailed, Washington and Ottawa -- citing national security and
    government privilege -- stalled for so long that cases never came
    to trial. the surviving victims settled for a pittance in an
    out-of-court settlement.

    Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable,
    the door was left open for possible resumption of similar
    "mind-control" activities.

    In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some
    half-dozen people had contacted us with appeals for assistance
    in ending what they believe to be electronic harassment and
    mind-control experimentation, possibly involving the CIA. We
    decided to take a closer look at the situation.

    We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals
    throughout the United States who appear to be targets of
    harassment and mind-control experimentation involving
    directed-energy technologies. [By mid-November 1992, the number
    had increased to 25.]

    Typically, persons who complain of being "zapped by radio waves"
    and of "hearing voices" are stigmatized as psychotic, delusional
    or schizophrenic. Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the
    treatment accorded UFO and psychic phenomena "freaks," we
    approach this subject with a high degree of caution. Based on our
    preliminary investigation, including interviews with the affected
    individuals, we conclude that the matter is serious and should be
    pursued further.

    The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal

    Our first step was to determine what, if any technology exists
    which might be used for electronic harassment. The information
    was found in a "white paper" published in 1991 by the U.S. Global
    Strategy Council -- a Washington-based organization, under the
    chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of the CIA, who
    maintains very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community.
    The "white paper" describes the foreign and domestic uses
    foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic radiators, infrasound,
    non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators, and high-powered
    microwave emitters.

    The term, "non-lethal," used to describe this technology is
    misleading. the energy emitted from all of these weapons can kill
    people when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of
    amplified, they can cause extreme forms of physical discomfort
    and debilitation.

    The Department of the Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as
    "non-conventional." They were so identified in an exhibit at a
    DA-sponsored symposium on "The Soldier As A System," in Crystal
    City, VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave incapacitators were
    separately mentioned during the symposium as being particular
    interested to the U.S. Marine Corps.

    We discussed these "non-conventional" directed-energy weapons
    with Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of the exhibit and the Army's
    delegate to NATO in matters pertaining to "The Soldier As A
    System." Mr. Shisler acknowledged not only that directed-energy
    weapons are in the DoD's arsenal, but also that the American
    soldier will remain vulnerable to their effects, should they be
    employed in the battlefield.

    The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of
    vulnerability, as well, and urges ongoing research into effective
    countermeasures.

    Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy
    Council's complete project proposal on this subject: (Title:
    Nonlethality: Development of a National Policy and Employing
    Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era, prepared by Janet
    Morris). A number of references in this Proposal to unidentified,
    elusive "enemies" of the U.S. Government and the potential
    domestic applications of this "non-lethal" technology invite
    serious consideration by the public at large.

    The Council's address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    20006, (202) 466-6029.

    BIOEFFECTS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION

    Research into biological and psychological effects of exposure to
    microwave radiation is voluminous. The U.S. public has been led
    to believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this research.
    The fact is, the CIA and DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly
    pursued precisely the same research since commencement of Project
    Pandora in the 1950's. The current primary users of this research
    appear to be the CIA, DoD, the National Security Agency (NSA) and
    the Department of Energy (DoE).

    The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has
    participated in this research since Project Pandora. In 1973,
    WRAIR discovered that externally-induced auditory input could be
    achieved by means of pulsed microwave audiograms, or analogs of
    spoken words' sounds. The effect on the receiving end is the
    (schizophrenic) sensation of "hearing voices" which are no part
    of the recipients' own thought processes.

    The experiment prompted the following comment in "The Body
    Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life," by Robert
    O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow & Company, NY,
    1985): "Such a device has obvious applications in covert
    operations designed to drive a target crazy with 'voices' or
    deliver undetected instructions to a programmed assassin."

    This research has continued, and the results are published in
    various publicly available scientific and technical journals.
    Interested readers might consult, for example: Lin, James C.,
    Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems (Plenum
    Press, NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department of
    Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a
    number of books and articles on this subject. [He has more
    recently informed us that he had designed the experiment referred
    above in Dr. Becker's book.]

    WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of
    exposure to high power microwave radiation. WRAIR presented a
    paper on this subject to a DoD-sponsored symposium on "MW
    [microwave] Weapons" at the Naval Postgraduate School in
    Monterey, CA, in mid-1989.

    A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting
    with auditory effects of pulsed microwave audiograms. Also,
    recent statements by an Army psychiatrist assigned to the Walter
    Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) suggest that WRAIR may be
    experimenting upon select psychiatric inpatients with microwaves.
    This, too, is a matter to us.

    CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT

    The Government's past record of abuses in the area of civil
    rights is well documented. Within the past 30 years alone, we
    have witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
    COINTELPRO.

    Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive
    Orders and implementing regulations were published which
    prohibited military and CIA domestic covert intelligence
    operations. Experiments on involuntary human subjects, and the
    surveillance of/collection of personal information on U.S.
    citizens, except under strictly regulated conditions were also
    prohibited.

    Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with
    these (quasi-) legal prohibitions. We have evidence that this is
    not being done. Moreover, where there are laws and, in this case,
    no laws enacted, there are loopholes, as well as individual and
    institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the existence of
    loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent
    examples. Loopholes are also found in government resort to
    "black" intelligence and weapons programs, in the use of
    contractors, and in the absence of clear definitions of such
    terms as "national security" and "national security risk."

    Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit U.S.
    Intelligence activities do not extend to non-intelligence
    government agencies or to their contractors. If fact, Executive
    Order 12333 specifies that government contractors do not need to
    know that their services support U.S. Intelligence objectives.

    In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on
    Oversight of Government Management addresses the problem of
    tracking funds granted to government-contracted research and
    development (R&D) centers. The report notes that the problem is
    compounded by DoD's penchant for creating hard-to-monitor "shell"
    contractors as disbursement centers for funding programs.

    Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly
    accountable to Congress. Being beyond Congressional oversight,
    they have the license to operate as Government surrogates in
    intelligence operations about which, "officially" they know
    nothing.

    In this context, a publication disseminated at DA's "The Soldier
    As A System" symposium noted that the Army's Research and
    Technology Program sponsors 42 laboratories and R&D centers,
    employing approximately 10,000 scientists and engineers. The
    annual budget of $1.3 billion is only a small part of overall DoD
    research spending.

    Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of
    "non-lethal" weapons, is not governed by laws restricting the
    activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may be
    presumed that these agencies contribute to and benefit from such
    research.

    PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

    1. The technology exists for the types of harassment and
       experimentation reported to us.

    2. About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of
       continuing experiments with effects which
       directed-energy weapons are designed to produce.

    3. U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects
       of exposure to microwave radiation is extensive and
       continuing.

    4. The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged
       in mind-control experimentation; and various agencies of
       the Government have a record of circumventing legal
       restrictions upon their activities.

    5. Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look
       closely into "black" intelligence and weapons
       procurement programs.

    6. A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest
       in testing directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens
       under non-clinical/non-controlled circumstances -- DoD,
       to test ranges and degrees of "non-lethality"; DoE, to
       explore "safety" limits; CIA, to test "mind-control"
       capabilities, and NSA, for technological refinement.

    PART II -- OVERT AND COVERT HARASSMENT

    Since publication of the preceding article less than four months
    ago, the association of National Security Alumni/Electronic
    Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13 individuals
    who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which
    coincide with the known effects of exposure to microwaves,
    electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.

    The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater
    detail in future Project reports. Suffice it to say, at this
    point, that the physical and psychological symptoms being
    reported to us are consistent with the effects which
    directed-energy weapons are designed to produce. Indeed, the
    numerous afflictions (or "inflictions") being reported appear to
    parallel standard torture "sequelae,"(1) (aftereffects).

    OVERT HARASSMENT

    Overt Harassment -- which obviously is meant to be observed --
    may be intended to "precondition" individuals for eventual
    long-term electronic harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained
    overt harassment are not likely to cope with the sudden onset of
    electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. This phased
    pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being
    investigated. The fact that the overt harassment continues in
    these cases even after the electronic targeting commences suggest
    that the objective is to maintain long-term extremes of stress.

    Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are
    surfacing in cases which (so far) have not involved discernible
    forms of electronic harassment. These are cases involving
    so-called "whistleblowers" who, because of their inside knowledge
    of certain potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats
    of embarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated
    employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is
    beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who
    try to assist electronic "harassees." Retaliation suggest loss
    of control. Under these circumstances, we are not entirely
    confident that "whistleblowers" will continue to be exempted from
    this type of harassment in the long term.

    The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their
    circumstances as involving most, if not all, of the following
    overt forms of harassment:

    *  Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of
       harassment and vandalism by formerly friendly neighbors.

    *  Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the
       targeted individual obtains new, unlisted telephone
       numbers.

    *  Mail interception, theft and tampering.

    *  Noise campaigns.

    While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered
    in this context, other tactics are employed. Blaring horns,
    whistles, sirens, garbage disposal (run concurrently in apartment
    settings, for excessively prolonged periods of time), and
    amplified transmissions of recorded "general racket" have been
    used on a recurrent basis under circumstances intended to
    persuade the individual that he or she is under surveillance.

    In all of these cases, the individuals' neighbors apparently
    pretend to be oblivious and/or indifferent to these sudden,
    continuous explosions of noise.

    Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in
    apartment buildings. One individual reported that, during a peak
    period of harassment, the neighbor across the hall began entering
    and leaving his apartment every 10 minutes, slamming his door
    loudly on each occasion. This was a daily occurrence,
    encompassing periods of several hours, over a period of several
    months. It is apparently served to trigger a door-slamming "chain
    reaction" on the part of neighbors both on that floor and on the
    floors immediately above and below. When our contact politely
    asked her immediate neighbor to close her door more quietly, he
    slammed the door in her face. Prior to commencement of this
    harassment, the neighbor had apparently been quite friendly and
    courteous.

    In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix
    Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD contractor engaged in the
    "super-secret" research and development of some type of
    electronic equipment.

    Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in
    their ventilation systems during the preliminary stages of their
    harassment. One individual complained of being recurrently
    awakened in the middle of the night by the sound of wires being
    fed into his (independent) ventilation system. On checking
    further, he found that a tubular construction had been built into
    his vent system which appears to lead to the apartment upstairs.
    His upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice.

    A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and
    downstairs apartments appear to follow them from room to room,
    tapping on the floor or engaging in other activities which appear
    intended to advertise an ongoing surveillance.

    The Justice Department employee mentioned above went as far as to
    offer an unsolicited apology to her downstairs neighbor for an
    all-night "pacing about" in her bedroom (in the event he had
    happened to notice it). She claimed to be an insomniac. The
    pacing-about continued during her recent 36-hour absence from the
    area. When her contact politely alerted her to the fact that her
    apartment had apparently been entered during her absence, she
    told him, in effect, to mind his own business and then
    immediately complained to the building manager that he was
    stalking her.

    [Continued to part 2]
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn125a.txt]
    ================================================================

    To subscribe to the MindNet Journal:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
    FTP Archive site:

     [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

    Index of back issues: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. Send articles for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    Please visit the Freedom Of Thought Foundation home-page at:

    .

    ================================================================

        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||
        |||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||
        ||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||
        |||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  SM
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        ||  VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303 / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  ||
        ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||