### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 70
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    Editor's Note:

    The Electronic Surveillance Project is no longer in operation
    as of Sept. 1995.

    ================================================================

    SILENT WEAPONS...

    By Julianne McKinney

    August 1995

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

                     Association of National Security Alumni
                          Electronic Surveillance Project
                                  P.O. Box 13625
                           Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625
                                  (301) 608-0143

    August 16, 1995

    #######Upton
    ##############
    ##############

    Dear Mr. Upton:

       I appreciated your having sent me the paper, "Silent
    Weapons..." Has anyone determined whether or not this economic
    theory was in fact addressed in the September 1980 issue of
    _Scientific_American_? Actually, the concept of refocused wealth
    is not all that farfetched. I think we saw a couple of "test
    runs" on this theory just a few short months ago, when a number
    of municipalities and major investors began complaining of
    tremendous losses (and bankruptcy) suffered as a result of
    investments in "derivatives." What I found even more interesting
    was the smirky manner in which an ABC commentator observed that
    nobody seems to understand how derivatives work, and nobody seems
    to know where all their money disappeared to. He obviously was
    trying to convey the impression that he knew more about
    derivatives than he was willing to state.
       On hearing these reports, my immediate instinct was that
    derivatives were the work of economic wargames in the bowels of
    the Pentagon, whose highly sophisticated computer programs were
    based on the monitoring and manipulation of the international
    exchange rates. At that time, some 147 separate derivative
    "wargames" -- or "scenarios," according to Leontief -- were known
    to exist. How many forms of derivatives exist at this present
    time is unknown, simply because our controlled media have been
    told to drop the subject.
       Curiously, I was asked to comment on this by Stan Solomon,
    during my last radio interview. I say, "curiously," because I am
    not an economist, have never pretended to be, and had been
    brought on air to discuss the abuse of directed-energy systems,
    not economic misadventures. It was after that interview,
    incidentally, that derivatives suddenly became a non-word in the
    media. Apparently no one else wanted to ponder the Pentagon's
    potential involvement in this area of economics.
       The "Silent Weapons" paper tends to support my theory
    regarding the Pentagon's becoming involved in economic
    "wargaming," particularly on page 2, where is stated, "The
    simultaneous solution of these equations by a computer...provides
    a numerical way of calculating possible future states of the
    economy. The time variable _derivatives_ of that model -- the
    *manipulation* and feedback automation of the World Economic
    Model -- produces various options (scenarios) for New Economic
    World Orders." (_Emphasis_mine_.)
       Actually, and as noted, Leontief (if real) is not all that
    farfetched. We are in the early stages of seeing his alleged
    theories of refocused wealth being implemented -- and not just in
    the form of derivatives. The lesson learned from the derivatives
    scam is that angry investors tend to make too much noise. These
    investors have the advantage because their misappropriated
    investments were made in good faith, which would thus give them a
    justifiable basis for demanding a full-scale investigation.
    (Interestingly, I have heard of no such investigation, which says
    to me that noisier complainers were probably bought off.)
       There are better ways of stripping the international populace
    of vast sums of money under circumstances that invite no
    outbursts of righteous indignation or threats of a large-scale
    investigation. Gambling, drugs, consumer fraud, sophisticated
    philanthropic scams, and arms purchases are amazingly effective
    as alternative means.
       The State of Connecticut, for example, is purportedly
    receiving $77,000,000/week in taxes from gambling revenues, yet
    Hartford is on the verge of bankruptcy. Where indeed is that
    money going?
       Lotteries throughout the country are supposed to be used for
    improvements in state and municipal facilities and in educational
    facilities and programs. After 10-15 years of experience with a
    lottery, Detriot's city planners (for example) are only now
    beginning top to repair some of the city's main expressways. The
    city's schools, meanwhile, remain notoriously substandard. Where
    is *that* money going?
       Drug addictions are bringing in billions of dollars. Where is
    *that* money going?
       CNN just mentioned, a couple of minutes ago, that consumer
    fraud costs the taxpayer about $44,000,000/year. Where is *that*
    money going?
       The most sophisticated and yet amazingly primitive
    philanthropic scam took place only a few months ago, when major
    educational, medical, and research institutions lost many
    millions of dollars to the Foundation for New Era Philanthropy.
    The money is unrecoverable, and one or two fall guys took the
    hit. Where did *that* money go?
       Then we have third world countries selling their souls for
    arms so they can decimate their and/or their neighbor's
    populations. Where is *that* money going?
       And now we have Congress rechanneling all of the taxpayer's
    money into the Department of Defense, to the exclusion of all
    else. That money, in turn, is channeled to major contractors who
    produce products which are of limited use to the average
    consumer, which in many cases are being used to subjugate large
    segments of the population on a graduated basis (directed-energy
    systems), and which will inspire all sorts of foreign governments
    to sell their nations down the river, as is now happening in
    Bosnia. And nary a peep from the average taxpayer.
       And then we have the innovative lone wolves who run
    centuries-old British banks into the ground from offices in
    Singapore, by misappropriating billions of dollars which are
    redirected into that mysterious ether where disappearing funds
    seem to be going.
       In sum, many trillions of dollars are being redirected into
    the hands of a relative few on a gradually-intensified basis,
    with the average citizen happily helping the process, blithely
    unaware of what the long-term consequences might be. Leontief's
    mathematically-based scenarios really aren't necessary at this
    stage, since tapping the wellspring of human gullibility, greed,
    and foolishness is proving sufficiently profitable. Regardless, I
    do anticipate that, at some point during the next few years, all
    stops will be pulled, the Pentagon's computers will be geared up,
    and a total derivatives plunder will take place. What we saw
    previously, as stated, was only a test run. (You can add that to
    my "homemaker's recipe for a successful Revolution in Military
    Affairs.")
       Be that as it may, the nice thing about human nature is that
    people who have tasted freedom don't adapt all that well to
    enslavement, as a general rule. A global takeover -- much less, a
    takeover of this government -- is not going to be easy.
       Well, on that note, I'd better get back to my packing. (As
    noted in my correspondence to Gordon Phillips, I am in the
    process of closing up shop.)
       Incidentally, I gather from one of your notes that you do in
    fact have a copy of the _Report_From_Iron_Mountain_. If I am
    mistaken, let me know (as soon as possible, since I am not
    leaving a forwarding address), and I will get a complete copy to
    you.

    Regards,

    [original signed]

    JULIANNE MCKINNEY
    Director,
    Electronic Surveillance Project

    (Addendum)

    P.S. This is the morning following my having drafted the
    preceding. Apparently this letter caused some sort of uproar
    amongst those who have me under 24-hour surveillance. Aside from
    being kept awake until 4:00 a.m. under very painful
    circumstances, I was knocked unconscious by directed-energy means
    and conjointly reduced to a bizarre "convulsive" process which
    did not quite succeed in producing massive vomiting. A variation
    on _grand_mal_ seizures, I would say.
       This is a first. I thought I'd been subjected to the gamut of
    incredibly painful directed-energy effects these past several
    years. Apparently not. Suffice to say, it is not a nice
    experience -- less so considering that I came very close to
    slamming my head against the sharp corner of a chair when
    crashing to the ground.
       Be that as it may, I have to conclude from the assault that my
    letter has raised some questions which now warrant consideration
    by the public-at-large, so, do not be surprised to hear that
    this letter has been circulated. It would appear that the
    questions in this letter need to be answered. As a courtesy to
    you, I am censoring the address block and headers on this
    letter, since I do not have your permission to identify you,
    specifically, as the source of the "Silent Weapons" report.

    --------------------------------
    "...Covert actions are counterproductive and damaging to the
    national interest of the United States. They are inimical to the
    operation of an effective national intelligence system and
    corruptive of civil liberties, including the functioning of the
    judiciary and a free press. Most importantly, they contradict the
    principles of democracy, national self-determination and
    international law to which the united States is publicly
    committed." (Credo of the Association of National Security
    Alumni)
    --------------------------------

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn170.txt]
    ================================================================

    To receive the MindNet Journal via email:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
    FTP Archive site:

     [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

    MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all
    responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles
    for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all
    responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or
    guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products,
    merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by
    advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    ================================================================

    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||||
    |||||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||||
    ||||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||||
    |||||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  sm||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||||||||||||  VERICOMM / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  |||||||||||||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||