    In a medical context, these systems can be used to great advantage
    to treat psychiatric and psychosomatic problems. As a system for
    remediating the profoundly deaf, it is unequalled. (Promises,
    promises. This is the most common positive use touted for this
    technology over the past 30 years. But the deaf are still deaf, and
    the military now has a weapon to use on unsuspecting people with
    perfectly normal hearing.)

    OFFICIAL DENIALS

    In fact, the US Government has denied or refused to comment on
    mindaltering weapons for years. Only last year, US News & World
    Report ran an article titled "Wonder Weapons", basically a review of
    the new so-called 'non-lethal' or 'less-than -lethal' weapons.' Not
    one word about S-quad, although the technology had been used six
    years earlier!

    Excerpts from the article read:

    "Says Charles Bernard, a former Navy weapons-research director: 'I
    have yet to see one of these ray-gun things that actually works…";
    and

    DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has come to us
    every few years to see if there are ways to incapacitate the
    central nervous system remotely,' Dr F. Terry Hambrecht, head of
    the Neural Prostheses Program at NIH, told US News, 'but nothing
    has ever come of it,' he said. 'That is too science-fiction and
    far-fetched."'

    It may sound "science fiction and far-fetched" but it is not.
    However, that is just what the powers-that-be want you to believe,
    so as to leave them alone in their relentless pursuit of...what?

    The idea behind non-lethal weapons is to incapacitate the enemy
    without actually killing them, or, in the case of riot control or
    hostage situations, to disable the participants without permanent
    injury, preferably without their knowing it. The electromagnetic
    mind-altering technologies would all fall into this class of
    weapons, but since they are all officially non-existent, who is to
    decide when and where they will be used?

    And why should selected companies in the entertainment industry
    reportedly be allowed access to this technology when the very fact
    of its existence is denied to the general public?

    As recently as last month [February], this stonewall approach of
    total denial or silence on the subject still held fast, even toward
    committees of the US Congress!
                                    -69-