### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 60
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    ================================================================

    NONCONSENSUAL BRAINWAVE AND PERSONALITY STUDIES BY THE U.S.
    GOVERNMENT

    By Cheryl Welsh

    1996

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonconsensual U.S. Government Studies

       I am a survivor of ongoing mind control experimentation by
    the U.S. government since 1989. I would like to prevent victims
    from experiencing much of the pain that I went through by telling
    my testimony within the framework of background information and
    history on government weapon testing programs, especially
    radiation experimentation. I would state the same testimony under
    oath in a Congressional hearing or in a court case. I first
    learned of microwave harassment and mind control experimentation
    from Julianne McKinney, director of the now inactive Electronic
    Surveillance Project. This is an overview and does not include
    the unsavory details as the point is to recognize the general
    pattern of experimentation. It will greatly help your
    understanding of this paper if the preceding Research
    Possibilities list of reputable newspaper and magazine articles
    on behavior control weapons is read first.
       I would challenge the reader to recognize the "plutonium
    vitamin pill" of mind control technology before the U.S.
    government admits to it's use. This paper is attempting to
    describe something that the reader is not familiar with. This is
    critical to keep in mind so that this paper will communicate on
    the basis of accepted reality.

    Background Information and History of Government Experimentation

       The Congressional Record states that the U.S. government had
    been involved in mind control experimentation from the 1950s up
    to the early 1970s.1 These illegal behavior control experiments
    are similar to the documented illegal radiation experiments. The
    U.S. government currently denies that there is ongoing classified
    behavior control experimentation. This is debatable and in my
    opinion will some day be as undeniable as the radiation
    experiments are today.
       There were at least 23,000 radiation victims of
    institutionalized unethical experimentation.2 There are
    similarities between radiation and mind control experimentation
    because the government bureaucracy is the same, the groups of
    victims are the same and it involves weapon testing. But unlike
    the atomic bomb, the U.S. public is not aware of the highly
    classified behavior control weapons. This fact contributes to
    the difficulty that victims have in exposing the experimentation.
       The purpose of U.S. government research with electromagnetic
    frequencies and computer-brain interface technology is to develop
    mind control weapons that meet or surpass the enemy's mind
    control weapon program, in particular Russia. The U.S. military's
    interest in controlling behavior and in using this on it's
    enemies in future warfare is well documented.3 The lethal doses
    and parameters of radiation were explored and now the limits of
    computer-brain interface and EMF technology are explored in the
    same unethical way. And by using unwitting victims, experiments
    are conducted without limits of human subject experimentation
    committees. There are strong indications that electromagnetic
    frequency (EMF) behavior control weapons and electronic warfare
    has been a classified area of research since at least the 1960s
    4, that there are highly classified international agreements to
    control it's use, that it is being tested on unwitting human
    subjects and that there is an active government program to cover
    up the whole situation. Recently, there have been several
    articles published on nonlethal weapons, EMF weapons, and mind
    control in the U.S.5
       And in the last five years there have been several articles in
    mainstream publications about the Russian mind control technology
    and EMF.6 And several reliable sources confirm that the cover up
    involves government policy such as the CIA refusing to release
    this information to the Radiation Advisory Committee. Glenn
    Krawczyk wrote in Nexus, Vol. 2, No. 22, Oct-Nov 1994, that the
    CIA used a trick of terminology to disguise the development of
    microwave weapons in the 1977 Congressional hearings on CIA
    behavior control programs and has done the same thing with the
    Radiation Advisory Committee in 1994.
       Another example: two top scientists in EMF research have
    discussed government harassment. Dr. Puharich, well-known for EMF
    and previous government work, described that his house was burned
    down and he was shot at for discussing EMF technology and it's
    development.7 Dr. Becker, the author of Body Electric on EMF,
    also lost government funding and discussed other examples of
    harassment by the U.S. government.8
       "The Soft-Kill Fallacy" by Steve Aftergood and Barbara Hatch
    Rosenberg in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientist, Sept/Oct 1994 p.
    45 stated that discussions under the Certain Conventional Weapons
    Convention on electromagnetic weapons, including weapons that
    interfere with mental processes and modify behavior and emotional
    response, may lead to protocols to control their use. The fact
    that behavior control weapons are in the public eye officially
    could mean that the government wants to use these weapons and may
    not be able to control their use enough to keep the EMF weapons a
    secret.

    What Mind Control Experimentation Is

       It is probable that classified computer-brain interface
    research has had a highly advanced technological leap similar to
    the pattern of the development of the atomic bomb weapon program.
    Many documented articles support this claim.9 It has been fifty
    years since the development of the atomic bomb and there have
    been major advancements in science, satellite technology,
    computers and information. In my case, mind control
    experimentation is the use of military electromagnetic frequency
    technology on human subjects in order to develop baseline studies
    of the brain, including brainwave studies and the study of
    personalities. As in radiation experiments, the lethal doses and
    the limits of the technology are explored and the experiments are
    inhumane. Mind control experiments are conducted as a result of
    development of behavior control weapons and are, like the
    radiation experiments, examples of science at it worst. Weapon
    testing programs are designed to disable and kill the enemy and
    therefore the experiments are also designed to destroy.
       There are over 500 documented cases of victims in the U.S., 1
    million alleged victims in Russia and cases in Germany, England,
    Canada, Finland, and South America.10 A few of the main
    similarities between victims are as follows. Women, prisoners and
    mental patients are a few of the powerless groups targeted in
    U.S. government experimentation. Most of the victims describe
    long term experimentation, some over 30 years. All ages,
    socioeconomic and political groups are represented in mind
    control experiments.
       This is a wide area of research and there are probably many
    umbrella projects to test many different parameters of behavior
    control weapons. Government experimentation with behavior control
    technology is based on psychological principles of war. For
    example, multiple personalities are thought to be caused by
    traumatic experiences. To determine how to control and destroy
    people, the experiments are designed to reliably create multiple
    personalities, (as in Project Monarch)11. Victim's testimony
    matches this fact.
       The U.S. government is using mental illness as a cover-up of
    mind control experimentation. Many of the experiments are
    designed to mimic mental illness. For example, the mental illness
    diagnosis manual for psychiatrists states that the mentally ill
    patient put unusual meaning or interpretations into normal
    objects. The experimenters can engineer visual and audio patterns
    and change the amount and timing of any environment in a specific
    way to make the victim see what a mentally ill person would see.
    In my case, I have videotaped evidence of this effect. A report
    by a university statistics professor confirmed an extremely high
    amount of red and white cars on two separate occasions when
    compared with normal car color populations.12
       With no meaningful evaluation, mental illness is the given
    explanation for the million plus victims. The concurrent
    development of technology, the U.S. government's history of
    involvement in mind control experiments and their motive to
    research this area can also strongly support the fact that these
    are victims of government experimentation. Further investigation
    of this situation is necessary rather than dismissing it as
    mental illness.

    Radiation and Mind Control Victims: The Same Dilemma

       I and most survivors have not able to obtain help. This is
    typical in government cover up situations. And because of the
    nature of the technology itself, any efforts to stop the
    experimentation can be sabotaged with the mind control technology
    itself. I have gone to the police, lawyers, private
    investigators, newspapers, magazines, organizations such as the
    ACLU, government agencies such as the U.S. Attorney General,
    Congressman Glenn, Kennedy, Feinstein, Sharp and more. The
    answers vary from "you are crazy"; "you have to know the source
    of the experiment and have monitoring equipment evidence"; "we
    don't handle cases such as this, it is out of our area of
    expertise"; to no reply, or "we are aware of the situation but it
    will take years and over $100,000 to pursue in court," and many
    other ways of saying no.
       Victims also cannot get around the unavailability of necessary
    government documents classified under the National Security Act.
    There is documented evidence that the superpowers have developed
    mind control weapons and that the use of these weapons are
    classified and controlled by the National Security Act. In the
    meantime, the government system is failing the mind control
    victim in the same way that it failed the radiation victim. I use
    what tools that I have, such as research of open literature and
    networking, a painfully slow process.
       At this point, none of the victims, singly or as a group have
    the funds to stop the experimentation. I do not have the funds
    to rent or buy signal analyzers to document signals that the
    government would surely cover up or jam. Some victims have
    documented some unusual signals, but it is such a small piece of
    evidence and is not directly tied to the government source. The
    evidence has been ignored or discounted. I am currently
    organizing a group of victims to be monitored by experts.
    Another group is also organizing.
       Victims work with their meager resources against a formidable
    foe. There is only one successful court case of mind control
    experimentation against the government and it was settled out of
    court. There was small compensation to a few of the victims.13
    Until I can document in other more scientific ways, I am
    documenting with videotapes and comparing them with normal tapes
    or accepted statistics. Then it is evident that certain patterns
    in the environment are unusual in timing and amount and
    statistically relevant and this is another small piece of the
    mind control picture.
       Experts are necessary to verify information for court cases
    and Congressional hearings. Videotape evidence and other mind
    control experimentation evidence does not directly tie the U.S.
    government to my allegation and therefore is not accepted by
    courts, congressional hearings, or UN complaints. There are many
    other basic and also complicated reasons for the government
    system and its failure to help victims in any significant way.
    The system obviously needs to be changed.
       By combining relevant facts with the testimony of victims,
    the conclusion about mind control experimentation is becoming
    clearer. I am networking with close to 75 victims. Based on my
    experience, several victim's testimony, and literature on mind
    control topics, it is logical to deduce that I am one of many
    hundreds of victims. Fortunately, documentation of behavior
    control weapons is increasing and the documentation matches
    previous and current testimonies of victims. But, so far it is
    too little, too late. This is the harsh reality of the situation.
       This is a lengthy description, but certain issues must be
    emphasized in order to survive normal skepticism that occurs when
    documented facts are missing. Why for example, did radiation
    experiments occur after the Nuremburg trials and why is mind
    control experimentation occurring in 1995? Reasons include; that
    evil such as the Auschwitz experiments did not end with the
    Nuremburg trials; that the National Security Act increased the
    odds that radiation experiments could occur; and in 1995, there
    is no meaningful deterrent for the actions of radiation and mind
    control "scientists".

    Remedies and Solutions

       Government experimentation is illegal and is an abuse of U.S.
    constitutional rights. One solution would be funding that would
    match the U.S. government's resources. Or it will take someone
    such as Hazel O'Leary of the Department of Energy who called for
    an investigation of radiation experimentation14, to start an
    investigation of the mind control experiments.
       Another possibility may be an accident in which the technology
    is exposed. Or time will pass, such as ten to twenty years, after
    which the technology will become public knowledge. Then there
    will be enough victims who come forward and protest. It would be
    an indication of man's humanity if the mind control scenario
    could be changed.
       For further information and networking, I can be reached at
     Comments are appreciated.

    Notes:

    More Information Upon Request from

    1. Alexander M. Capron, _Human_Experimentation_, (University
    Publications of America, 1986), 247.

    Excerpt: "Apparently, it was not unusual for such research to
    begin with volunteers and then move on to naive subjects. For
    example, in 1953 the CIA began a series of highly sensitive
    experiments into the use of biological and chemical agents to
    alter human behavior, under the general code name, MK-ULTRA. The
    areas explored included radiation, electroshock, paramilitary
    devices and materials, anthropology, graphology, psychiatry,
    psychology, and sociology."

    Also: Andrew Weil, _Acid_Dreams:_The_C.I.A.,_L.S.D._and_the_
    _Sixties_Rebellion_, by M. Lee and B. Shlain Book reviews,
    Nation, 8 Nov. 1986. p 492.

    Excerpt: "Lee and Shlain sifted through mountains of heavily
    censored reports to piece together the early history of L.S.D...
    Meanwhile the U.S. Army toyed with the idea of driving whole
    populations insane with hallucinogenic drugs. By the mid-1960s
    nearly 1,500 military personnel had taken L.S.D. in tests run by
    the Army Chemical Corps."

    2. "Radiation Test Involved At Least 23,000," _Seattle_Times_,
    Oct.22, 1994, p.A1.

    3. Lt.Col David J. Dean USAF, _Low-Intensity_Conflict_and_Modern_
    _Technology_ with a forward by Congressman Newt Gingrich, (Air
    University Press, Center for Aerospace Doctrine Research and
    Education, Maxwell AFB June, 1986)

    Excerpt: The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict by
    Capt Paul E. Tyler, MC, USAF:

    Potential Military Applications of EMR

    The exploitation of this technology for military uses is still in
    its infancy and only recently has been recognized by the United
    States as a feasible option. A 1982 Air Force review of
    biotechnology had this to say: Currently available data allow the
    projection that specially generated radio frequency radiation
    (RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel
    military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability of
    induced electric current to completely interrupt mental
    functioning for short periods of time, to obtain cognition for
    longer periods and to restructure emotional response over
    prolonged intervals. Experience with electroshock therapy, RFR
    experiments and the increasing understanding of the brain as an
    electrically mediated organ suggested the serious probability
    that impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to
    purposeful behavior and may be capable of directing and or
    interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage of
    approximately 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to
    cardiac standstill and death, again pointing to a speed-of-light
    weapons effect. A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an
    effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System
    effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity,
    pulse widths, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency. The
    system can be developed using tissue and whole animal
    experimental studies, coupled with mechanisms and waveform
    effects research. Using relatively low-level RFR, it may be
    possible to sensitize large military groups to extremely
    dispersed amounts of biological or chemical agents to which the
    unirradiated population would be immune.(1)

    4. Joint Hearings before the Senate Select Committee on
    Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific
    Research of the Senate Committee on Human Resources, Project
    MK-ULTRA, The CIA's Program of Research in Behavioral
    Modification, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 75 (1977) Also, Paul Brodeur,
    _The_Zapping_of_America_, Toronto edition George J. MacLeod,
    1977. Explains the Russian Microwaves on the Moscow U.S. Embassy.
    Also, Declassified CIA document, Pulsed Microwave Used for Mind
    Control...1974.

    5. _Newsweek_, Science of War nonlethal weapons. 7 Feb, 1994.
    Also, _Daily_News_, Nonlethal Weapon, 3 Aug, 1994.

    Also, _SPIE_REPORTS_ New Technologies Provide Tools For Law
    Enforcement Challenges Conference, chair William H. Webster,
    9-94.

    6. Refer to eight articles under Research Possibilities, this
    paper, #1,3,5,6,8,9,10,11.

    7. Dr. A. Puharich, Electromagnetic Conference, Sept. 1987, New
    York, audiocassette.

    Excerpt: "About ten years ago in 1976, no I'm sorry, early 1977,
    I made the basic measurements which showed the elf nature of elf
    coming from Russia and that it was psychoactive, that was my
    finding and I deduced the chemicals that were released by the
    frequencies that were being used and I passed that information
    onto every intelligence agency we have in this country from the
    president on down and England and Canada and all I got was four
    years of harassment. My house was burned down, I was shot at,
    they tried to kill me, they tried to eliminate me, etc., etc.,
    and finally they agreed I was right and in 1981, the U.S.
    government went into full scale elf warfare and set up all their
    big transmitters down under in Australia and Africa so on and so
    on and now their in business and everything's classified and you
    can't say a god damned thing about it, a tough situation. And you
    can't get any real information out of any government agency. And
    I know all of them that do the work. I know the people who head
    the projects etc. When they're in trouble, they usually come ask
    me. And they classify what I tell them. Insanity."

    8. Robert O. Becker,MD and Gary Selden, _The_Body_Electric:_
    _Electromagnetism_and_the_Foundation_of_Life_. Wm Morrow &
    Company, NY 1985.

    9. Dr. Karl H. Pribram,(Stanford Professor, famous for
    holograghic theory of the brain), editor, _Rethinking_Neural_
    _Networks:_Quantum_Fields_and_Biological_Data_, Lawrence
    Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1993. p.156-7.

    Excerpt: "B. Multiple Personality....Now suppose that the
    diabolical training is `extensive', both figuratively and
    literally. that is, suppose that it succeeds in placing other
    avoidance patterns into a geometry that surrounds and isolates a
    large cognitive domain from the rest of the neural network.
    Subsequently, wavepackets that form in that domain will be
    trapped there, and that domain will then develop a personality
    that is distinct from the personality of the exterior domain(s).
    But the entrapment is not permanent: Quantum tunneling provides a
    mechanism for penetration of the barrier, after which another
    distinct personality emerges."

    Also, Fox Butterfield, _The_New_York_Times_, $2.15 million for
    hidden-weapon research, _Seattle_Post-Intelligencer_, Friday,
    March 10, 1995, A3.

    Excerpt: "...for the development of new high-technology gun
    detectors that would permit the police to spot people carrying
    concealed guns on the street or inside stores. "The camera works
    because the body naturally emits strong electromagnetic signals
    in the millimeter wavelength, said Dr.Richard Huguenin, the
    inventor of the device at Millitech Corp."

    Also, C.C.Morton, Brain trust, New Recruits, _UC_Davis_Magazine_,
    Spring 1994, p.21.

    Excerpt: "In the lab of psychology professor Ron Mangun, UC
    Davis students serve as research subjects for a technique known
    as electrophysiology, in which 64 electrodes dotted on a cloth
    cap record electrical impulses from the surface of the head. The
    impulses are thought to correspond to cognitive processes inside
    the brain. The subjects sit in a sound booth. While one computer
    system flashes images, another computer system records the
    brain's responses 400 times a second.11

    Also, _The_Guardian_, The Future Art of War, 25, May 1995, p. 9.

    Excerpt: "Nick Lewer, peace researcher at the University of
    Bradford, looks in the latest issue of Medicine and War,..."
    "There are plans for `mind control' with the use of
    `psycho-correction messages' transmitted by subliminal audio and
    visual stimuli. There is also a plan for `psychotronic weapons' -
    apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations -
    and another to use holographic projection to disseminate
    propaganda and misinformation."

    Also, The Houston Chronicle, Brainpower, 16, Feb. 1995.

    Excerpt: "`Brain-actuated control' is under development at the
    Dayton, Ohio, base to help pilots deal with the increasing amount
    of information needed to fly modern jets, said Grant McMillan,
    director of Patterson's biocybernetics lab. Eventually, pilots
    may be able to control flight using only their minds, he added.
    With biofeedback, in which changes in the brain are portrayed on
    screens, volunteers learn how to control the electrical activity
    created by their thought processes. Scalp monitors pick up the
    electrical signals, and a computer translates them into
    mechanical commands."

    10. Association of National Security Alumni, Electronic
    Surveillance Project Julianne McKinney, Director. Not in
    existence at present. Over 100 victims in 1993.

    International Committee For the Convention Against Offensive
    Microwave Weapons P.O. Box 58700 Philadelphia, PA 19102-8700.
    Tel: (215) 893-9505. Harlan Girard, Director. Over 500 victims in
    1995.

    Freedom of Thought Foundation, P.O. Box 35072 Tucson, AZ 85740
    Walter Bowart, Founder. Over 150 survivors in 1995.

    Mediacco, Director, Robert Naeslund P.O. Box 136, 11479
    Stockholm, Sweden. Implant victims and mind control.

    Canadian Stone Angels, Director, Lynne Moss-Sharman 369 Pearl St.
    Apt 2, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 1A9,
    Masonic/military/medical/mind control victims.

    Ecology And Living Environment, A Russian environmental and civil
    liberties group, Moscow, 500 members. Set up an association of
    "Victims of Psychotronic Experimentation, President, Emilia
    Cherkova," No address. From: Owen Matthews," Report: Soviets Used
    Top Secret `Psychotronic' Weapons," _The_Moscow_Times_, 11, Jul.,
    1995, Section No 750.

    11. Walter Bowart, _Operation_Mind_Control_. Flatland Editions
    1978, 1994.

    12. Letter from Jessica Utts, Professor of Statistics University
    of California, Davis October 18, 1995 to Cheryl Welsh.

    Excerpt: "...For whatever reason the color distributions at the
    two locations do not appear to be statistically equivalent. In
    other words, if the cars at both locations were considered to be
    randomly sampled from the same population of cars, discrepancies
    in color as extreme as those you have observed, or more so, would
    only occur with probability 0.0004. Most statisticians would
    conclude, based on this number, that the populations from which
    the two sets of cars were sampled were different in terms of
    color distribution. ..."

    13. Refer to Research Possibilities, this paper, #5.

    14. Stephen Budiansky, Erica E. Good & Ted Gest, "U.S. News
    Investigative Report" _U.S._News_&_World_Report_, 24, Jan.
    1994, p. 34. "Orlikow v. U.S., filed in 1979, was settled in
    1988 for $750,000." It was settled out of court and split among
    the several defendents.

    15. Melissa Healy, _Los_Angeles_Times_, "Energy chief says U.S.
    owes radiation victims," _The_Sacramento_Bee_ final 29 Dec. 1993.
    p A1.

    Excerpt: "Under O'Leary, the department has vowed to `come clean'
    on the secrets of nuclear testing. Her department and a special
    panel of doctors, lawyers and department aides she has named are
    investigating dozens and possibly hundreds of
    government-sponsored experiments in which humans were subjected
    to radiation."

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn160.txt]
    ================================================================

    To receive the MindNet Journal via email:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
    FTP Archive site:

     [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

    MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all
    responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles
    for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all
    responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or
    guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products,
    merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by
    advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    ================================================================

    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||||
    |||||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||||
    ||||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||||
    |||||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  sm||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||||||||||||  VERICOMM / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  |||||||||||||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||