### MindNet is no longer active.

#### Back to MindNet Index

    ================================================================
         MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 55
    ================================================================
         V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
    ================================================================

    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
    otherwise noted.

    The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
    the author.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
    copy remain intact and unedited.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross

    Editor's Note:

    The following article originally appeared in _True Stories of
    False Memories_ by Eleanor Goldstein and Kevin Farmer, 1993.
    The introduction is by the authors of the book. The author
    of the letters wishes to remain anonymous.

    ================================================================

    TO MY SISTER'S THERAPISTS

    By Anonymous

    1992

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       The following three letters were written by the brother of a
    woman who recalled grotesque "memories" of satanic ritual abuse
    during several years of therapy with Mr. Carleton. Initially,
    she claimed to remember her father molesting her between the
    ages of four and seven. As time passed, memories began to emerge
    in therapy of her being ritually abused during elaborate satanic
    ceremonies attended by several men and women. Among other things,
    she claims she was raped by her grandfather, using the body parts
    of murdered women, and she believes she was forced to murder and
    eat babies.
       She was later evaluated by a psychologist, Dr. Taylor, because
    of a custody battle for her children. Dr. Taylor concurred with
    Carleton's diagnosis and agreed with the treatment she was
    receiving. Her family later convinced her to see a psychiatrist
    for another opinion. She was referred to Dr. Hoffmann who also
    validated her bizarre memories of mass murder, cannibalism and
    the most perverted sexual abuse imaginable.
       As these letters demonstrate, none of the three therapists
    attempted to corroborate the woman's memories or were even
    willing to consider listening to the pleas and rational
    explanations presented by her brother and the rest of the family.
    All three therapists apparently believe that their roles were to
    validate memories no matter how they were retrieved or how
    unlikely they were to be true.

    August 19, 1992

    Dear Mr. Carleton,

       I'm writing to clarify some of the things we touched on in
    our phone conversation August 4. I recall you saying that as a
    therapist, you believe your patients in the context of the
    therapeutic session, regardless of whether their story
    corresponds with external reality. You also stated that your
    specialized training enables you to distinguish between a false
    reporting of sexual abuse and a true one. In fact in one meeting
    you frankly told me you believe my sisters allegations. At that
    time these were limited to sexual molestation by my father from
    an early age through puberty. Since then those allegations have
    expanded to include multiple homicide, vampirism, cannibalism,
    and membership in a vast conspiracy dedicated to the overthrow
    of Christ's benevolent influence on Earth. I assume you are
    familiar with the details of her memories, which she says
    have been recovered through your help and that of group sessions
    with others similarly victimized.
       As I told my sister in a phone conversation on August 6, I
    have pored over her statements, numerous similar statements by
    ritual abuse survivors, read and re-read Michelle Remembers, the
    writings of Catherine Gould, RoGand Summit and other specialists
    in the field. I have also studied cases that have come to court
    based on similar allegations: the McMartin Day Care Center, the
    case in Lido, Utah, the case of Paul Ingram in Washington.
    State, the Orkney islands in Great Britain and numerous others.
       I have consulted three different therapists; one a specialist
    in hypnotism, one a specialist in sexual abuse and one a former
    lawyer. I have read two tomes on trance and hypnotism by Spiegel
    and Bliss. I have studied papers on brainwashing by J.F. Dulles
    and others. I've also read some of the works of David Finkelhor,
    Alice Miller, Bass and Davis' The Courage to Heal articles by
    Jeffery Masson and other authors of like persuasion. I have
    reviewed proposals to State and Federal legislatures concerning
    Ritual Abuse and reports from State and Federal justice
    departments on the subject. I mention all this to assure you that
    I do not take any of this lightly. Nor have I instantly drawn a
    conclusion as to the reality or falsehood of my sisters
    allegations. I comprehend what they imply about the condition of
    this world, our society, my extended family, myself and most
    importantly, my unborn child. As I told you, her accusations,
    and the vast conspiracy theory that lends them context, have not
    triggered any spontaneous inward belief in me.
       As I said, I do feel and believe my sisters pain. You asked me
    how else I account for that pain. I'm not sure if the question
    was rhetorical, but an abundance of alternative explanations
    have come to mind. Before I go into them, I'd like  to state
    that I'm not certain you were entirely candid with me when you
    implied that you come to therapeutic sessions with an objective
    and unbiased frame of mind. For my own self I must accept that I
    am trapped in a bias toward disbelief. I factor that bias into my
    considerations as best I can. Can I assume you recognize a
    similarly powerful, though contrary, bias in your own being?
    Could your own faith in your religion color the impressions you
    receive from clients? If your faith is such that you see it not
    as coloring, but as casting on your observation the pure white
    light of truth, what more can I say? If on the other hand, you
    hold that portion of doubt that any objective mind must contain,
    I contend it is worth our time to continue discussing my sister's
    case.
       Concerning faith, I agree with St. Paul that it has the power
    to move mountains. Against such power how can my arguments
    prevail? But Paul goes on to state that without love, you are
    nothing. The point is that I love my sister. It is that love that
    motivates this appeal to you despite your apparent writing me off
    as being "in denial." Sally Jean is my sister, my flesh and
    blood. She is your patient, or client; at best a soul to be saved
    or a mind cured, at worst a lucrative business opportunity. I
    have long maintained to the rest of my family that your
    intentions in treating her are, in fact, noble. But I also
    maintain that the course of advice and treatment you have taken
    victimizes her and my family and, of even larger consequence,
    will help perpetuate sexual victimization of innocent children
    for a long time to come.
       As to the goodness of your intentions, it is my opinion that
    equally good intentions motivated inquisitors and witch trial
    judges throughout history to send untold thousands of wrongly
    accused men and women to torture and execution. It strikes me
    that this era of history is being repeated. I feel that the
    imagery of satanic ritual abuse arising within therapy and
    amplified throughout the world in seminars, courtrooms and the
    media is the stuff of phantasm and hysteria today as it was in
    the past. I believe that today innocent people are accused,
    suffer the forced removal of their children, and are prosecuted
    by the same spectral evidence that sent so many to the rack and
    stake in the not so distant past. And I think that the
    psychological engine behind that slaughter was driven by the
    same noble intentions that guide your treatment of my sister.
       I don't expect any sympathy from you for the anguish that
    Sally's accusations against my parents and grandparents have on
    me or the rest of my family. I do expect you to take seriously
    the effect on genuine victims of abuse when their voices are
    drowned in this torrent of false and fantastic accusation. The
    responsibility for that predictable tragedy will be on those of
    your profession who have nourished a chorus of "Wolf-crying" in
    their patients and clients. As I said to you, because those
    crying "Wolf" describe in vivid detail the yellow eyes, dripping
    fangs, foul breath and even the fleas, the cry is, in my
    considered opinion, no less a false alarm. If nothing else, the
    probable consequences are of such gravity that I must continue to
    urge you to consider carefully alternative explanations for my
    sister's and other people's pain and therapeutically induced
    recollections.
       To repeat myself, I admit a bias to disbelieve the scenario
    described by my sister. It is utterly contrary to my own memories
    and to the fruit of my observation, experience and reflection.
    Although I trust my own judgement, I recognize that I can
    fervently believe what proves untrue and likewise find false
    what I subsequently come to believe. Knowing this, I am slow and
    careful to draw conclusions. I remain open to argument and
    evidence intended to compel my belief or dispel it. I beg you to
    do the same. Please look at and consider the following sources I
    offer from professionals and concerned individuals which support
    my position. One article is by Kenneth Lanning of the F.B.I., who
    has investigated numerous similar cases. The others are from a
    Christian magazine, Cornerstone, which I include in hopes that
    you may attend more carefully to fellow Christians. I have left
    out the bulk of my research material because it is plainly less
    even-handed or sympathetic. If you are interested I recommend
    the book In Search of Satan by Robert Hicks, The Institute for
    Psychological Therapies in Northfield, Minnesota, and the False
    Memory Syndrome Foundation in Pennsylvania.
       To return to your question: how do you account for my sisters
    pain? I stand by what I told you. Much of her condition is
    "iatrogenic." The process she has over the years described by
    analogy as removing a splinter from a festering wound--a process
    she credits you primarily with assisting-appears to me as
    worrying a minor sore into a full-blown infection or a major
    tumor. She recently told me that she now recalls over, 35
    homicides she witnessed my parents committing throughout America.
    She also said that she must continue to retrieve such memories
    from her unconscious to complete her cure. "I have come to
    believe that it is within her ability to enter a state of trance
    allowing her to invent vivid "memory." I believe that the
    content of that memory is assisted by a system of belief brought
    to her therapeutic sessions and by her exposure to material
    engendered by that same paradigm. I feel that this paradigm
    constitutes an assault, not so much on the truth, but on the
    means that truth can be arrived at. I am not alone in the opinion
    that the truth cannot be discovered without debating
    contradictory conclusions from the same observations.
       It was in the spirit of such debate that I sought to meet with
    you and Sally. I felt compelled to inform her that I was unable
    to resolve all I had learned about the phenomenon of satanic
    ritual abuse in favor of her assertions. I wanted to do so in
    an environment she would feel protected in, namely your office. I
    have found that professionals of your persuasion regarding this
    subject tend to shield themselves as well as their clients from
    contrary opinion. Unfortunately the cancellation of our meeting
    of August 11 tends to confirm my expectation. It is a shame that
    I now feel driven into an opposing camp because we do share a
    fundamental concern: that the sexual abuse of children must be
    stopped.
       Do not think that because your camp bears this as a standard,
    that myself my family, or others who similarly disagree with you
    can be branded as approving of sexual abuse of any nature. Nor
    should you rely on the concept of "denial" to neatly categorize
    and dismiss those of us who doubt your version of reality. I
    appreciate that you have staked your professional reputation on
    your interpretation of my sister's condition. I also realize
    that you are not alone in that interpretation. In fact yourself
    and like-minded colleagues, as well as members of law
    enforcement and a growing body of elected officials, have arrived
    at the conclusion that satanism is rampant. Many regard such
    memories as my sister's as proof. It is apparent to me that the
    numbers of professionals and individuals of your persuasion
    constitute a powerful force, I'm not sure you appreciate that
    power. When I spoke to you of an impending backlash you
    responded in tones of one already facing overwhelming odds. I
    feel, however, that the greater risk is to those who would oppose
    your assumptions. It frightens me to do so. I hope you will
    understand that it is your assumptions and not your character
    that I oppose and that my opposition to them is motivated by
    concern for my sister and my family.
       This has been a difficult letter to write and doubtless
    unpleasant for you to read. I don't consider it a strictly
    private correspondence and you are welcome to show it to whoever
    you please. I will include a copy to my sister and the rest of
    my family.

    August 26, 1992

    Dear Dr. Taylor,

       I'm writing to you in keeping with a practice of clarifying
    and documenting discussions I have with professionals regarding
    my sisters case. Thank you for considering the materials I left
    behind; transcripts of my sisters correspondence with family
    members, my letter to her therapist and the Kenneth Lanning
    monograph.
       I was flattered that you found me bright and well-informed.
    Indeed I regard you with respect for your sincerity and
    intelligence. However I did understand your statement to imply I
    had merely armored myself in my convictions. In turn I must admit
    that I question your own conviction that you can flawlessly
    distinguish testimony that corresponds with external reality
    from that which does not. So stripped of the mutual eloquence of
    our conversation it is possible we spent an hour calling one
    another fools. If so, I am the greater fool for I left  a hundred
    dollars behind.
       I did take with me your suggestion that I hypothetically
    suspend my doubt and look at those things within me that satanic
    ritual abuse may account for. One value of the exercise was that
    it made me appreciate how much that hypothetical model of reality
    can release one from personal responsibility for shortcomings,
    sins and failure. Another result was unexpected: I realized
    that I rather like the person I am. I rarely meditate on this,
    but I do see myself as a loyal and trustworthy friend and mate.
    I cleave closely to the rule of doing to others as I would have
    them do to me. I feel exuberance and pleasure at beauties of
    life: music, art, the natural world. I participate in them
    enthusiastically. I feel spontaneous love and appreciation for
    fellow occupants of this planet. I endeavor to help those I can
    and seek help from those who will offer it. I have developed a
    refined curiosity and a kind of gourmet hunger for knowledge. Nor
    do I think I mistake the accumulation of information for
    knowledge or the accumulation of knowledge for wisdom. As I said
    to Jack Carleton, I am slow to leap to conclusions and to fly
    from particulars to generalities. This was not actually an
    epiphany, and it did present at least one troubling thought; if
    I like the person I am, and that person is the result of a
    satanic upbringing, should I positively credit that upbringing?
       When I have thought at all about Satan, I've regarded that
    being as a metaphor, one that conveniently embodies all the
    misfortunes of life from spoiled milk to war and world famine.
    But that being never seems to take personal credit for his deeds.
    On the other hand the historical record details extraordinary
    torture and execution practiced by proud and righteous
    Christians on human beings suspected of associating with Satan.
    Does the fact that I find such behavior by Christians repulsive
    lead me to have sympathy for the devil? I bring this up because I
    genuinely fear the power embodied in the convictions you
    apparently share with  my sister, her own and other therapists,
    and the politically entrenched Christian right.
       I fear the effect that power can have on those who would
    disagree with your shared convictions. For the record, I have no
    interest in Satan or Satanism other than how it seems the focus
    of all my sister's energy.
       In order to stay in contact with my sister she has required I
    take a daunting leap of faith, and I imagine she referred me to
    you to assist that leap. Your own experience with your son's
    ritual abuse and the stretch of rational faculties that event
    required of you, and your stature as doctor of psychology no
    doubt qualifies you for such assistance. I would like to outline
    the mental steps I must take: 1) Disregard my memories which are
    typified by feelings of love, care and protection, are vivid,
    spontaneous, detailed and chronologically consistent. If I
    understand correctly, I must consider them to be manipulated
    and tailored by satanic experts. 2) Likewise disregard my sense
    impressions of the character of my parents and their parents.
    The feelings I have of their essential humaneness, protection
    and concern I must dismiss as a product of denial and fantasy. I
    must substitute those feelings with the hatred and vengefulness
    my sister embraces. 3) Accept as fact that my parents and
    grandparents belonged to a vast and ancient cult. That this cult
    required its members to regularly engage in prescribed ritual
    accompanied by elaborate accoutrements,  featuring
    decapitation, cannibalism, and every manner of rape and sexual
    abuse of my sister and other victims. 4) Accept that this cult
    practiced these rituals undetected among an isolated rural
    population consisting largely of relatives and devout
    Christians. Accept that these rituals and their attendant murders
    either escaped detection by law enforcement in specific and
    varied locations throughout America, or that upper echelons of
    the law participated in and covered up these crimes. Accept that
    no disaffected members of this cult were able to escape its
    domain and reveal its existence to authorities. Accept that those
    authorities were in fact so well controlled by fraternal
    members that even non-participating and in formed underlings
    produced not a peep. That no gossip circulated regarding these
    activities and no rumors surfaced until recently. 5) Accept
    that the majority of institutions, financial, religious,
    fraternal, military and political in this country and abroad are
    controlled by this cult. That its members include experts in
    evidence disposal far too sophisticated for detection
    capabilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or that the
    F.B.I. conspires with the criminals. 6) That this arch-conspiracy
    entails more than mere human agency, but is guided by the
    manifest hand of a supernatural being, namely Satan and his
    demonic cohorts.
       Its a big leap. If I'm correct that my sister expects you to
    assist me in that leap, it will require more than your assurance
    of professional acumen in deciphering reality, or even your
    obvious intelligence, kindness and sincerity. I hope you can
    come to accept that my assertions and arguments in your office
    were neither intellectual fencing nor thoughtless protection of
    a self-imposed or externally programmed world view. I was
    expressing my thoughts and feelings. An alternative to this leap
    of faith I understand my sister to require, is the opinion that
    her world view is in fact delusional; and that her delusion is
    buoyed up by the profession of psychology. Such an opinion
    would imply that the profession has lost its intellectual and
    philosophical moorings, and its rational and scientific rudder,
    is adrift and infested with verminous catch-phrases, buzzwords
    and checklists in the place of serious research or cogent
    analysis. That would be a mournful opinion to arrive at, but
    maybe you can see why I tend toward it.
       You offered me a pair of guidelines in accepting testimony as
    fact. One was the affect of an adult patient in recall, the
    vividness and detail of their memory, and the assumption that
    these things could not be imagined or acquired from any source
    but actual experience. The other is the testimony of children,
    how their natural innocence should dispel all doubt in the
    listener. You referred to the statements by my nephew, and to
    those of your own son. In fact I accept that your son's memory
    and experience was a real and terrible thing. I do not deny that
    not only sexual abuse, but abuse involving ritual, does exist. In
    my nephew's case I would like for you to consider a few things.
    He has been constantly exposed to his mother's process of recall
    over many years. Unlike yourself my sister is a crusader on this
    subject. Her belief leads her to suspect that her children were
    abused as she remembers her abuse. She has taken him to
    psychologists to probe this suspicion. Unlike you, a great number
    of therapists are not reticent about asking leading questions and
    rewarding expected answers. I recall your condemning this type of
    questioning in the McMartin case. My sister also believes in the
    principle that only a specialist, such as yourself with a full
    understanding and belief in the existence of satanic ritual
    abuse, can properly treat a supposed victim. From this
    predisposition I would imagine that the therapists she selected
    for her son would be of this type. I also would understand that
    my nephew is in a double-bind regarding his mother. What would
    you do if given the choice of finding your primary care giver
    delusional and unstable, or joining with her against an insidious
    enemy?
       Unfortunately you and I don't share your opinion of your
    ability to objectively determine reality from  a victims
    statements. Also, unfortunately, it is obvious that my
    involvement disqualifies me from objectivity. So I am left to
    persuade with only the power of my opinion and what authoritative
    sources support it.
       I think that the ability to be coerced to believe varies in
    individuals and their situation, something along the lines of
    Spiegel's Induction Profile I described. My nephew's family
    situation and perhaps a hypnotic gift I venture he, my sister and
    myself share, would readily explain the memories unveiled in your
    office.
       But we come back to what divides us. Why should I think my
    memory is real and my sisters is not? All I can offer is that I
    have been only minimally exposed to therapy and trance induction.
    That unlike my sister, my memories are not fantastic or
    bizarre. I do not subscribe, on a weekly or daily basis, to the
    influence of groups and individuals devoutly committed to and
    focused on a specific version of reality. And most distinctively,
    I do not isolate myself from contrary opinion.
       Your personal experience and professional commitment to the
    satanic paradigm not withstanding, I expect you to seriously
    consider my interpretation. If you've gotten this far in this
    letter, I can hope that your own mind is actually open enough to
    provide a truly mediative role in future contact with my
    sister, for myself and possibly the rest of my family.

    September 24, 1992

    Dr. Hoffmann,

       You have played a brief but significant role in shattering my
    family and breaking my heart. Neither the ethical concept of
    confidentiality nor the legal one of privilege that you cited in
    cutting off my entreaty cast month forbid you from reading this.
    I sincerely hope that you do.
       I called you on August 20th because my sister suggested I do
    so and I assumed that she had granted permission to discuss her
    case. You have served as a signal beacon in a therapeutic journey
    which has led her by steps to declare my parents and grandparents
    rapists, murderers and cannibals. In the course of this journey
    doubtful family members begged her to seek the opinion of a
    professional psychiatrist unallied with her own therapist,
    Jack Carleton. She was referred to you by Sutton Hospital. Your
    advice, according to her, was to stay the therapeutic course and
    avoid those "in denial."
       Whether or not I am "in denial" I am a member of her family; a
    brother who loves her and has stayed in close contact with her
    over the past 12 years. When I revealed that I doubted the
    reality of my sister's therapeutically recovered memories, I felt
    your tone turn defensive and your manner become abrupt.
       I think it is possible that my sister's recollections stem from
    a source altogether different than actual experience. I am not
    alone in that opinion. I am including in this letter articles
    citing such authorities in case their views have escaped your
    attention.
       I think it reasonable that a professional conclusion as to the
    reality of allegations of such grave implication--psychological,
    social, spiritual, not to mention legal--would reflect
    familiarity with thoughts and feelings of the victim's family. It
    disappoints me that my offer of such a perspective was so curtly
    dismissed. It offends me to have my own memories, thoughts and
    feelings summed up as "denial." It frightens me that this
    summation from a man of your profession carries with it the
    authority of diagnosis.
       But what most hurts and confuses me is your seeming lack  of
    concern for the consequences of your assessments, to myself
    and my family, if you are wrong. In fact if you are correct and
    all my sister describes is true, your response seems even more
    disheartening. Is it not worth your time to illuminate and help
    protect a person who your patient contends was similarly
    victimized?
       My exchange with you and my understanding of your role in my
    sister's current condition leaves me angry and frustrated.
    Knowing that you may represent a significant trend of thought
    and behavior among those of your profession makes me weep for the
    poor souls seeking help from psychotherapy.
       Beyond the ethical guidelines you advised me of in our
    conversation stands that fundamental axiom "first do no harm." A
    dreadful harm has been done, Dr. Hoffmann, and I directly suffer
    it. I beg you from my heart to at least consider and investigate
    that harm as a human being, if not a man whose business it is to
    heal and protect.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn155.txt]
    ================================================================

    To receive the MindNet Journal via email:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our
    FTP Archive site:

     [/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

    MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission
    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
    reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all
    responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles
    for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all
    responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or
    guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products,
    merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by
    advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in
    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

    ================================================================

    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||||  ||||  |      |       |  |      |      |   |   |   |   ||||
    |||||  ||  ||  |||||  |||  |  |  |||||  ||  |  | |  |  | |  ||||
    ||||||    |||  ,,,,|      ||  |  |||||  ||  |  |||  |  |||  ||||
    |||||||  ||||      |  |||  |  |      |      |  |||  |  |||  sm||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    ||||||||||||  VERICOMM / MindNet : MindNet@c2.org  |||||||||||||
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||