name: Ton Hoogeboom

e-mail: acjhoog@mac.com

alt: ton.hoogeboom@student.uvh.nl

do you want your email listed: yes

can others place your information else where on the web: yes

do you want to join a contact list with other victims: yes

in the event of your dead or missing in action. do you want your personal account to remain on the mcf site: yes

would you care to be an area contact for other victims: yes

area-contact: Electronic / Psychotronics harassment

contact-address: ton.hoogeboom@student.uvh.nl

location: Netherlands
Received 03-12-2006
your-introduction: see google search for:  035 6018562

A Journal of Alternative News &amp; Information • For a New Consciousness, a
New Humanity, a New Era!

Electronic Mind Control
Brain Zapping
Part One
By JASON JEFFREY
Tense nervous headache? Always run down and irritable? Not feeling yourself?
Well maybe that’s because you’re not yourself, rather, you are being
controlled from somewhere else by someone or something else.

A few years ago the BBC program “Tomorrow’s World” featured a man whose
Parkinson’s Disease symptoms could be controlled by pressing a switch on a handset
which in turn operated a tiny device implanted into his brain. No more shaking, no more tears. This
is the friendly, caring side of neural implants, but many people believe that dark forces are
at work, trying to take over the minds of their targeted subjects via tiny objects inserted into
various parts of the body. Even worse, these sinister controllers are beaming strong
electromagnetic rays into the minds of innocent victims, influencing their thoughts and emotions.
These shadowy forces take many forms; some say that it’s intelligence agencies like the CIA; others that it’s a secret cabal plotting for control of the world’s population;
still others that it’s malicious aliens, the Greys, who use implants as tracking devices so that they
can abduct and control their hapless victims anytime and anyplace.
Warnings of new forms of mind control are not just the rantings of so-called
‘conspiracy theorists’
and ‘paranoid cranks’. Nature1 reports on developments in neuroscience as
“posing a potential
threat to human rights…” Jean-Pierre Changeux, a neuroscientist at the
Institut Pasteur in Paris,
told a meeting of the French national bioethics committee that advances in
cerebral imagining
make the scope for invasion of privacy immense. He said that although the
equipment needed is
still highly specialised, it will become commonplace and capable of being
used at a distance.
That will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty, control
of behaviour and
brainwashing. Denis LeBihan, a researcher at the French Atomic Energy
Commission, told the
meeting that the use of imaging techniques has reached the stage where “we
can almost read
people’s thoughts.”
Behavioural Control
American interest in the hypnosis-EMR [electromagnetic radiation] interaction
was
still strong as of 1974, when a research plan was filed to develop useful
techniques in human volunteers. The experimenter, J.F. Schapitz, stated: “In
this
investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of the hypnotist may also
be
conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the
subconscious parts
of the human brain — i.e., without employing any technical devices for
receiving or
transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence
having a chance to control the information input consciously”.2
— Robert O. Becker, Nobel Prize nominee, 1985
Although our modern electronic age has been in existence only since the turn
of this century,
individuals have claimed that their minds were being remotely influenced and
controlled by
machines for at least two centuries.
Recorded way back in 1810 is the case of James Tilly Matthews, a London tea
broker, who
claimed his mind was being controlled by a gang operating a machine he
called an “Air Loom”
which sent out invisible, magnetic rays from a London cellar. Matthews
believed machines like
the Air Loom were also controlling the minds of members of the British
Parliament. He wrote
letters to the MPs warning them about the machines and the conspiracy
behind it. Matthews was
committed to Bethlem Hospital as being insane.3
It might be easy to dismiss Matthews’ claims of a machine that can control
one’s mind because
of the early date. However, his is by no means an isolated case.
In 1994 Ronald K. Siegel, a Associate Research Professor in the Department of
Psychiatry and
Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA, wrote Whispers: The Voices of Paranoia.4 Dr.
Siegel, an
expert on hallucinations, edited a book on this subject in 1975 with Louis
Jolyn West of
MKULTRA fame.5
MKULTRA, as well as projects BLUEBIRD, ARTI-CHOKE, CHATTER, CASTI-
GATE, MKDELTA,
MKNAOMI, THIRD CHANCE, MKSEARCH, MKOFTEN, etc., were covert CIA
projects involving
many prominent members and institutions of the medical and scientific
communities to
investigate and experiment with various forms of behaviour modification and
control using, in
many cases, unwitting human subjects. In operation from the late 1940’s
until the early 1970’s,
they delved into everything from drugs to hypnosis to electronics.6
Whispers is a collection of case histories of mind control, (or ‘paranoia’ as he
calls it) studied by
Siegel. One case concerned a man named Tolman who believed his mind was
being controlled
by computers via a satellite system named POSSE (Personal Orbiting Satellite
for Surveillance
and Enforcement). Interestingly, author Dorothy Burdick, in her 1982 book
Such Things Are
Known described what she claimed was her mind control harassment by
computers via
satellites. She names Siegel as being the inventor of a device named FOCUS
(Flexible Optical
Control Unit Simulator) which can project hallucinations directly onto the
retina so the subjects
can’t distinguish the images from reality.7 In Siegel’s book Tolman claims
images are being
directly transmitted into his brain. Siegel says, “You mean to tell me that here
are machines
capable of sending visual images directly into the brain?”8
In 1968 Siegel published a professional paper titled “A Device for Chronically
Controlled Visual
Input” which is a description of a device he developed to project images
directly into the brain of
experimental animals via the optic nerve. He suggests further
experimentation be “conducted on
neonates (kittens) which have their total visual stimulation controlled from
the time they open
their eyes.”9
Thirty years later a team of US scientists wired a computer to a cat’s brain
and created videos
of what the cat was seeing. One of the scientists working on the project,
Garret Stanley of
Harvard University, predicts machines with brain interfaces. We can only
imagine how far such
technology has advanced in the secret research laboratories of the US
government and the
military/industrial complex.
Unlike Matthews, today’s victims can point to a wealth of documentation
confirming how
government agencies and research centres have been developing
technologies and methods
with the same capabilities that people have been describing for two centuries.
These
technologies involve elements of psychology, hypnosis, political conspiracies,
and even devices
that emit “rays” to control the behaviour of others without their knowledge or
consent.
Biological Process Control
In 1996, the US Air Force Scientific Advisory Board published a 14-volume
study of future
developments in weapons called New World Vistas. Tucked away on page 89
of an ancillary
15th volume are some hair-raising insights into the future ‘coupling’ of man
and
machine in a section dealing with ‘Biological Process Control’. The author
refers to an ‘explosion’
of knowledge in the field of neuroscience, adding, ominously:
One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the
output
of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human
body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscular
movements,
control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions,
interfere
with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and
delete
an experience set.
Translating the words ‘experience set’ from military jargon into plain English,
this means, simply,
that they envisage the ability to erase your life’s memories and substitute a
new, fictitious set.
By projecting such developments into the future, the authors of New Vistas
are camouflaging
present day capabilities. A similar futuristic scenario with many references to
mind manipulation
is described in The Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War (US
Army War
College, 1994). Authors Steven Metz and James Kievit declare: “Behaviour
modification is a key
component of peace enforcement” and “The advantage of [using] directed
energy systems is
deniability.” The authors ask: “Against whom is such deniability aimed?” The
direct answer is “the
American people”.
Set in the year 2010, Metz and Kievit write of “perception moulding” and
“advanced
psycho-technologies” to avoid irksome public protest, but that is just the
beginning. The major
obstacle, they believe, is that “traditional American ethics [are] a major
hindrance,” and thus,
sadly “old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty
[are to be] changed.”
The future presented by Metz and Kievit sounds like a mixture of George
Orwell’s 1984 and the
recent movie The Matrix. Individuals unwilling to go along with the
revolutionary changes are
“identified using comprehensive inter-agency integrated databases.” They will
then be
“categorized” and “sophisticated computerized personality simulations” will
be used “to develop,
tailor and focus psychological campaigns for [ie. against] each.”
Other techniques to be used in association with these new mind weapons
include ‘morphing’, a
present-day ability that controls the distortion of TV images. So, if you are
lucky enough not to
have your brain electronically scrambled or erased, the electronic news media
will be
manipulated especially for you, presenting convincing near-real-life visual
images through your
combined TV set-cum-internet interface.
Silent Sounds
The Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) technology, also known as “S-quad”,
was developed
by Dr. Oliver Lowery of Georgia, USA, and is described in US Patent
#5,159,703 as “Silent
Subliminal Presentation System.” The abstract for the patent reads:
A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or
very
high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum
are
amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and
propagated
acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through
the use
of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated
carriers
may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and
stored
on mechanical, magnetic or optical media for delayed or repeated
transmission to
the listener.
According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible, using
supercomputers, to
analyse human emotional EEG patterns and replicate them, then store these
“emotion signature
clusters” on another computer and, at will, “silently induce and change the
emotional state in a
human being.”
Judy Wall, writing in Nexus (October-November 1998), says “Silent Sounds,
Inc. states that it is
interested only in positive emotions, but the military is not so limited. That
this is a US
Department of Defense project is obvious.”
Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds Inc., says this about S-quad in a
letter dated 13
December, 1996:
All schematics, however, have been classified by the US Government and we
are
not allowed to reveal the exact details… we make tapes and CDs for the
German
Government, even the former Soviet Union countries! All with the permission
of the
US State Department, of course… The system was used throughout Operation
Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully.
By using these computer-enhanced EEGs, scientists can identify and isolate
the brain’s
low-amplitude “emotion signature clusters”, synthesise them and store them
on another
computer. In other words, by studying the subtle characteristic brainwave
patterns that occur
when a subject experiences a particular emotion, scientists have been able to
identify the
concomitant brainwave pattern and can now duplicate it. “These clusters are
then placed on the
Silent Sound carrier frequencies and will silently trigger the occurrence of the
same basic
emotion in another human being!”
Synthetic Telepathy
Synthetic telepathy is a term used to describe the beaming of words,
thoughts, or ideas into a
person’s mind by mechanical means, specifically, some type of
electromagnetic transmitter,
similar to a radio or television broadcast, operating in the microwave
frequency band. In recent
years thousands of people have come forward claiming to be victims of this
frightening
technology.
The first officially reported scientific experi-ment documenting a case of
synthetic telepathy
cannot be found in the academic literature because of the highly secretive
nature of the
research.
In 1961 Allen Frey, a freelance biophysicist and engineering psychologist,
reported that a human
can hear microwaves.10 This discovery was dismissed by most United States
scientists as being
the result of artifact (outside noise).
The more technical description of the experiment is described by James C.
Linn.11
Frey... found that human subjects exposed to 1310 MHz and 2982 MHz
microwaves at average power densities of 0.4 to 2 mW/cm2 perceived
auditory
sensations described as buzzing or knocking sounds (also described as clicks
or
chirps).
The peak power densities were on the order of 200 to 300 mW/cm2 and the
pulse
repetition frequencies varied from 200 to 400 Hz... Frey referred to this
auditory
phenomenon as the RF (radio frequency) sound. The sensation occurred
instantaneously at average incident power densities well below that necessary
for
known biological damage and appeared to originate from within or near the
back of
the head.
Further testing revealed that two requirements were necessary for the subject
to hear the
microwave induced sound: “good bone conduction and the ability to hear
acoustic energy above
5 kHz...”
By 1975 the introduction to a paper by A.W. Guy and others begins, “One of
the most widely
observed and accepted biologic effects of low average power electromagnetic
(EM) energy is the
auditory sensation evoked in man when exposed to pulsed microwaves.”12
Present day US Government use of synthetic telepathy was described in the
October-November
1994 issue of Nexus:
Directed-energy weapons currently being deployed include, for example, a
micro-wave weapon manufactured by Lockheed-Sanders and used for a
process
known as ‘Voice Synthesis’ which is remote beaming of audio (i.e., voices or
other
audible signals) directly into the brain of any selected human target. This
process is
also known within the US Government as ‘Synthetic Telepathy’.
Microwave Zapping
Much of the work done with microwaves was developed by Project Pandora,
which was put into
place by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) at the Walter Reed
Army Institute of
Research to study the effects of microwaves that were being beamed into the
American
Embassy in Moscow by the Russians. Some of the findings of the scientists
involved with
Pandora are quite disturbing. Dr. Joseph C. Sharp and engineer Mark Grove
were able to hear
and distinguish one-syllable words by pulse-modulated microwaves.13
Microwaves can also alter the permeability of the body’s blood-brain barrier,
14 which can
synergistically increase the effects of drugs, as the military is well aware.
“Using
relatively low-level RFR, it may be possible to sensitise large military groups
to extremely
dispersed amounts of biological or chemical agents to which the unirradiated
population would
be immune.”15
Sound can be transmitted even easier through the use of implants – cochlear
implants, implants
that send electrical signals into the fluid of the inner ear, or implants that
transmit sound
vibrations via bone conduction, such as the cases of dental fillings picking up
audible radio
signals. The stimoceiver, invented by Dr. Jose Delgado, consists of wires
running from strategic
points in the brain to a radio receiver/transmitter located entirely under the
skin. Through this
device, Delgado was able to stimulate raw emotions such as arousal, anxiety,
and aggression
with the turn of a knob.16
Of course, secret research by the US Government into microwaves and
synthetic telepathy has
moved on considerably since the end of the Cold War.
McVeigh: Manchurian Candidate?
Among the many telemetry instruments being used today, are miniature radio
transmitters that can be swallowed, carried externally, or surgically
implanted....
They permit the simultaneous study of behaviour and physiological
functioning.
— Dr. Stuart Mackay, Bio-Medical Telemetry (textbook), 1968
While visiting friends in Decker, Michigan, Timothy McVeigh complained that
the Army had
implanted him with a microchip, a miniature subcutaneous transponder, so
that they could keep
track of him. He complained that it left an unexplained scar on his buttocks
and was painful to
sit on. McVeigh was convicted of the 1995 bombing of a US Government
building in Oklahoma
City.
Miniaturised telemetrics have been part of an ongoing project by the military
and the various
intelligence agencies to test the effectiveness of tracking soldiers on the
battlefield. The
miniature implantable telemetric device was declassified long ago.
According to Dr. Carl Sanders, the developer of the Intelligence Manned
Interface (IMI) biochip,
“We used this with military personnel in the Iraq War where they were actually
tracked using this
particular type of device.”
It is also interesting to note that the Calspan Advanced Technology Centre in
Buffalo, NY
(Calspan ATC), where McVeigh worked, is engaged in microscopic electronic
engineering of the
kind applicable to telemetrics. Calspan was founded in 1946 as Cornell
Aeronautical Laboratory,
which included the “Fund for the Study of Human Ecology,” a CIA financing
conduit for mind
control experiments by emigre Nazi scientists and others under the direction
of CIA doctors
Sidney Gottlieb, Ewen Cameron, and Louis Jolyn West.
According to mind control researcher Alex Constantine, “Calspan places
much research
emphasis on bioengineering and artificial intelligence (Calspan pioneered the
field in the 1950s).”
In his article, “The Good Soldier,” Constantine states:
Human tracking and monitoring technology are well within Calspan’s sphere
of
pursuits. The company is instrumental in REDCAP, an Air Force electronic
warfare
system that winds through every Department of Defense facility in the
country. A
Pentagon release explains that REDCAP “is used to evaluate the effectiveness
of
electronic-combat hardware, techniques, tactics and concepts.” The system
“includes closed-loop radar and data links at RF manned data fusion and
weapons
control posts.” One Patriot computer news board reported that a
disembodied,
rumbling, low-frequency hum had been heard across the country the week of
the
[Oklahoma] bombing. Past hums in Taos, New Mexico, Eugene and Medford,
Oregon, Timmons, Ontario and Bristol, England were most definitely (despite
specious official denials) attuned to the brain’s auditory pathways.
The Air Force is among Calspan’s leading clients, and Eglin AFB has farmed
key
personnel to the company. The grating irony — recalling McVeigh’s
contention he’d
been implanted with a telemetry chip — is that the Instrumentation
Technology
Branch of Eglin Air Force Base is currently engaged in the tracking of
mammals
with subminiature telemetry devices. According to an Air Force press release,
the
biotelemetry chip transmits on the upper S-band (2318 to 2398 MHz), with
up to
120 digital channels.
There is nothing secret about the biotelemetry chip. Ads for commercial
versions of the device
have appeared in national publications. Time magazine ran an ad for an
implantable pet
transponder in its 26 June, 1995 issue — ironically enough — opposite an
article about a militia
leader who was warning about the coming New World Order. While
monitoring animals has been
an unclassified scientific pursuit for decades, the monitoring of humans has
been a highly
classified project that is but a subset of the Pentagon’s “nonlethal” arsenal.
As
Constantine notes, “the dystopian implications were explored by Defense
News for 20 March,
1995:
Naval Research Lab Attempts To Meld Neurons And Chips: Studies May
Produce
Army of ‘Zombies.’
Future battles could be waged with genetically engineered organisms, such as
rodents, whose minds are controlled by computer chips engineered with
living brain
cells.... The research, called Hippo-campal Neuron Patterning, grows live
neurons
on computer chips. “This technology that alters neurons could potentially be
used
on people to create zombie armies,” Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the
Brookings Institution, said.
“It’s conceivable,” according to Constantine, “given the current state of the
electronic mind control art, a biocybernetic Oz over the black budget
rainbow, that McVeigh had
been drawn into an experimental project, that the device was the real McCoy.”
Timothy McVeigh
may have unknowningly been an Army/CIA guinea pig involved in a classified
telemetric/mind-control project — a “Manchurian Candidate.”
Soviet Research
A highly secretive battle was being waged behind the scenes during the Cold
War in the area of
EM weapons (sometimes described as psychotronics) to control and influence
the minds of
people. It’s only now that some of this research has emerged, but much of it
remains hidden and
classified. In fact, we know more about Soviet research into this area because
it was the Soviet
Union that collapsed.
A 1975 issue of the Soviet publication International Life, discussing electronic
mind control
developments, stated that atmospheric electricity can be used “to suppress
the mental activity”
of large groups of people. The Soviet journal said that a sonic generator,
tuned to an infrasound
(below the hearing level) frequency, could create “feelings of depression, fear,
panic, terror, and
despair.”
In 1977, the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) declassified a report
describing how
advances in Soviet psychotronic technology can create the ultimate big
brother society, by using
electronic mind control against populations to implant ideas and thoughts
into the heads of
unsuspecting victims: “Sounds and possibly even words, which appear to be
originating
intracranially (within one’s own head), can be induced by signal modification
at very low average
power densities.”
The DIA report also said that the Soviets discovered that secret microwave
radiation can be
used to induce in unsuspecting victims: “Headache, fatigue, perspiring,
dizziness, menstrual
disorders, irritability, agitation, tension, drowsiness, sleeplessness,
depression, anxiety,
forgetfulness, and the lack of concentration.”
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, in a manoeuvre identical to Operation
Paperclip in World
War II,17 Western intelligence agencies obtained all the Soviet research and
recruited key
personnel working in this sensitive area. Russian research has now all but
stopped due to
economic crises.
A report in Defense Electronics in the early 1990s said that a Richmond,
Virginia firm,
Psychotechnologies (believed to be closely tied to the CIA and the FBI)
purchased the American
rights to Soviet mind control devices.
Defense Electronics described a spring, 1993 meeting between Clinton
Administration officials
and Soviet psychotronics experts, including Dr. Igor Smirnov. Amongst the US
agencies
represented at the meetings with Smirnov were the FBI, the CIA, the Defense
Intelligence
Agency, and the Advance Research Projects Research Agency. Clinton
Administration officials
wanted “to determine whether psycho-correction... programs could be
undertaken by the US
Government. These devices could be used to affect judgment or opinion of
decision-makers, key
personnel or populaces.”
Clinton defense officials expressed interest that the psychotronic devices
could be used “in
non-violently” clearing areas of potential enemies, snipers, etc. On the
domestic front,
psychotronic devices could be used to suppress political dissidents, and any
other potential
threats to the New World Order.
Also meeting with the Soviet experts were officials from giant international
corporations, such as
General Motors, and researchers from the National Institute of Mental Health.
The 22 August,
1994 Newsweek magazine reported on a secret Arlington, Virginia meeting
between experts from
the FBI’s Counter-Terrorism Centre and Dr. Smirnov, whose work was
described in the
publication:
...Using electroencephalographs, Smirnov measures brain waves, then uses
computers to create a map of the subconscious and various human impulses,
such
as anger or the sex drive. Then through taped subliminal messages, he
claims to
physically alter the landscape with the power of suggestion.
Psychotronic Weapons Research
One man’s name has become synonymous with the field of non-lethal
weapons development.
Col. John Alexander first became known to the public through his December,
1980 Military
Review article titled, “The New Mental Battlefield.” This article clearly
describes the lethal nature
of many of the so-called “non-lethal” weapons now being developed to
control civilian
populations. Alexander noted:
Psychotronics may be described as the interaction of mind and matter… The
possibility for employment as weaponry has been explored. To be more
specific,
there are weapons systems that operate on the power of the mind and whose
lethal capacity has already been demonstrated.
Describing Soviet development of psychotronic weapons, Alexander stated:
“The
ability to... cause death can be transmitted over distances, thus inducing
illness or death for no
apparent reason.” These “weapons would be able to induce illness or death at
little or no risk to
the operator... The psychotronic weapon would be silent (and) difficult to
detect...”
Powerful elite insiders have long known how electromagnetic weapons can be
effectively utilised
to wage mind control against the population, specifically targeting political
dissidents and
troublemakers. What of the numerous political activists and investigative
journalists who died
under mysterious circumstances, many from rare forms of cancer? Could they
have been ‘taken
out’ by psychotronic weapons? We can only imagine how advanced this
technology is today.
President Lyndon Johnson’s Science Adviser, Dr. Gordon J.F. MacDonald wrote
the 1968 book,
Unless Peace Comes, A Scientific Forecast Of New Weapons.
MacDonald described how man-made changes in the electrical earth
ionosphere can be used for
mass behaviour control. He said that low frequency electromagnetic
oscillations can attack the
low frequency electromagnetic brain waves in human beings. He stated,
“Perturbation of the
environment (by geophysical warfare) can produce changes in behavioural
patterns.”
In his 1970 book, Between Two Ages, Zbigniew Brezezinski (a long-time
Establishment
strategist) described “weather control” as a “new weapon” that is a “key
element of strategy.” He
added:
Technology will make available, to leaders of major nations, a variety of
techniques
for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security
forces
need to be appraised.
Brzezinski predicted the exact types of electromagnetic psychotronic
weapons that the US
Administration is now developing for mass behaviour control of citizens. He
stated:
It is possible — and tempting — to exploit, for strategic-political purposes,
the fruits
of research on the brain and on human behaviour... Accurately timed,
artificially
excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce
relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth... In this way,
one
could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of
a very
large population in selected regions, over an extended period.
Ultimate Threat to Freedom
As this is being written mankind faces the ultimate threat to what remains of
individual liberty
and freedom. Our right, our heritage of free will and creative thought is in
danger of being
permanently denied by insidious technology in the hands of New World Order
elitists and their
minions who serve a spiritual conspiracy that dwells within, and can be aided
by, each of us. It is
up to each and every one us to fully resist – on all levels of our being – the
attempts by these
evil forces to control our thoughts, emotions and actions.
But does this conspiracy extend much further than mere man-made political
and economic
forces? What of the evidence for a metaphysical component that is working
behind the scenes?
This question will be dealt with in Part Two of this article.
Part Two of this article will deal with alien abduction, implants and the occult/
psychic warfare
being waged to control the minds of the world’s population.
Footnotes:
1. Nature, Vol. 391, 22 January 1998
2. Becker, Robert O., Selden, Gary, The Body Electric, New York: William
Morrow, 1985, p. 321.
3. Haslam, John, Illustrations of Madness, London: G. Hayden, 1810.
4. Siegel, Ronald K., Whispers: The Voices of Paranoia, New York: Crown
Publishers, 1994.
5. Siegel, R.K., West, L.J., Hallucinations: Behavior, Experience, and Theory,
New York: Wiley,
1975.
6. Marks, John, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, New York: Times
Books, 1979.
7. Burdick, Dorothy, Such Things Are Known, New York: Vantage Press, 1982,
pp. 150-151.
8. Siegel, Ronald K., Whispers: The Voices of Paranoia, New York: Crown
Publishers, 1994, p.
65.
9. Siegel, R.K., “A Device for Chronically Controlled Visual Input,” Journal of
the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 1968 Sept., 11(5), pp. 559-560.
10. Frey, A.H. “Auditory System Response to Radio Frequency Energy”,
Aerospace Med.
32:1140-1142, 1961.
11. Lin, James C., Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, Springfield, IL,
USA: Charles C.
Thomas Publishers, 1978.
12. Guy, Arthur W., Chou, C.K., Lin, James C., and Christensen, D.,
“Microwaved-Induced
Acoustic Effects in Mammalian Auditory Systems and Physical Materials”, Ann.
NY Acad. Sci.,
247:194-218, 1975.
13. Justensen, Don R., “Microwaves and Behavior”, American Psychologist,
3/75, p. 396
14. Lin, James C PhD., Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, Thomas
Books, 1978, p.
190; Brodeur, Paul, The Zapping of America, WW Norton &amp; company, 1977, p.
85
15. Tyler, Capt Paul E, MC, USN, “The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-
Intensity Conflict” in
Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, edited by Lt Col David Dean,
USAF
16. Delgado, Jose, Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized
Society, New York:
Harpers, 1969
17. Operation Paperclip was created by US intelligence during World War II.
The goal was to
recruit top Nazi specialists to be taken back to the US to continue their work
in top secret areas
like rocket science and genetics. It is now historical fact that dozens of Nazi
scientists were
recruited by the operation.
The above article appeared in
New Dawn No. 59 (March-April 2000)
Current Issue / Back Issues / Articles / Book Reviews / What is New Dawn?
Links / Contact Us / Survey / Subscribe
© Copyright 2002 by New Dawn Magazine and the respective authors.
Click here for our reproduction notice.
Web Master/Designer &amp; Tech.Support by Viacheslav N. Lutsenko

personal-account: A.C.J. Hoogeboom
Joh. Poststr. 216
3762 VS Soest
The Netherlands
tel.  31 (35) 6018562

May 4, 2005


The Honorable Janet Napolitano
Governor of Arizona
1700 West Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
http://www.governor.state.az.us/

Tel 602-542-4331
Fax 602-542-1381

Dear Governor,

In the fall of 2003 i made a vacation trip to the USA, where amongst
other places I also payed a visit to Flagstaff Arizona. I visited
several of the most popular tourist sites in the area of Arizona and
California.

What i want to address here is that during my Holiday vacation i
suffered from various different types of harassments which can be seen
as electronic attacks to my body, mind, soul and most important, my
physical brains.

So could it happen that during a computer breakdown of about 15 minutes
at MGM studio&#39;s in Hollywood, whilest a scene from Water-world was
running, a voice came to my ears, which was spoken in the Dutch
Language and was apparently only meant for me personally. This was a
total mind blowing experience, almost in the literal sense of the above
words. The scene happened to consist of water and exists of a
background decor of rather large metal plates.

Next i was confronted with sea mammals at the Fishermen&#39;s Wharf in
Monterey (CA) from which again voices came to my ears which were
clearly in the Dutch Language. The Dutch voices were not directly
intended for me personally, but more like a dialog between the sea
mammals themselves which happened to be in the Dutch Language.

I also took some pictures during my visit in L.A. After returning to
the Netherlands, the pictures were developed and printed. Inspection of
these pictures (dia&#39;s) show clearly a strange and distorted face at the
deck of a sailing tour which i attended in L.A. This strange and
distorted face again also showed up at the before mentioned background
decor of big metal plates.

During my visit to the Colorado Dam I filed a official complaint about
this at the entrance gate, however not which much luck.

During a tour-flight with a Helicopter for a period of one day and an
hour in the direct area i was harassed again. I experienced electric
current on my body when i touched the helicopter. I didn&#39;t file a
complaint about this though.

A few days later after the helicopter sight seeing tour a terrible
helicopter crash accident happened in which 6 people were killed.  I
only heard of this accident after i returned back to the Netherlands.
At the Travelers Desk of hotel Hacienda i however was able to finally
file a official written complaint about the above harassments. The next
day I flew back home where i also warned the Airport Security
personnel, but again without much luck.

Does EMP, Electro Magnetic Pulse, have a impact on electronics? Of
course it does. Does a weak EMP have influence on electronics?  Hard to
tell. Can EMP be a permanent harassment to the brain?  I couldn&#39;t tell.

Can the environment also be effected by a EMP attack? Well there are
signs enough showing that a persons direct surroundings are also
directly effected by such kind of Electrodynamic harassments. The best
example of this would be my husband which now starts to display also
some serious health problems according these EMP alike attacks.

Without doubt unsolicited hypnosis and other kinds of harassments have
been taken place. The rather strange deaths of people around me, (close
friends) have not helped in this. The traumatic effects of these tragic
deaths only worsens these EMP harassments.

One thing is crystal clear for me here though, which is my personal
conviction, that evil persons are involved into this matter.

The above testimony has also been filed and written down with the
Travel Agency &#34;Kras Reizen&#34; in Flagstaff Arizona. The travel hostess
called Maggy de Bruyn has been briefed with the above, and is fully
aware of the problems addressed here.

It won&#39;t come as a surprise to you now, that the above described
problems are not only just my own private perceptions of things but
also that without doubt external Electronics Devices, most probable
Long Range Distance ones, are currently in over active use on several
people inside the U.S.A.



As of today, May 4, 2005 ,

My only sensible action left to do is hereby file a official complaint
of the above to the Governor of Arizona as a last possible resort to
get these absurd harassments to ordinary people to stop.


Yours Sincerely,



Ton A.C.J. Hoogeboom BSc.

Addenum
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Name has lawfully changed from A.C.J. Roomer to A.C.J. Hoogeboom March
31th 2004.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
5 citations in the pharmacy as junior researcher at University of Utrecht as
A.C.J. Roomer and now psychology student. (2004-now)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
The High Court in the Netherlands has an attest that people who hear voices
cannot be seen as a schizophrenic and cannot be medicated in hospitals
when they do not agree to be a schizophrenic.

de VolksKrant Friday March 31st 2005
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
I have been medicated in 2002-2003 for 3 months without my admit with
Zyprexa.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Mind-reading machine knows what you see
New Scientist News April 25, 2005

Improved Scanning Technique Uses Brain as Portal to Thought

It is possible to read someone&#39;s mind by remotely measuring their brain
activity using functional MRI scanning, researchers have shown. The
technique extracts information from subjects that they are not aware of
themselves.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------


links: see google search for:  035 6018562


On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind
Invasive Technology

Carole Smith

For those of us who were trained in a psychoanalytical approach to the
patient which was characterised as patient centred, and which acknowledged
that the effort to understand the world of the other person entailed an
awareness that the treatment was essentially one of mutuality and trust, the
American Psychiatry Association’s Diagnostic Criteria for Schizotypal
personality was always a cause for alarm.  The Third Edition (1987) of
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) required that
there be at least four of the characteristics set out for a diagnosis of
schizophrenia, and an approved selection of four could be: magical thinking,
telepathy or sixth sense; limited social contact; odd speech; and over-
sensitivity to criticism. By 1994, the required number of qualifying
characteristics were reduced to two or more, including, say, hallucinations
and ‘negative ‘ symptoms such as affective flattening, or disorganised or
incoherent speech – or only one if the delusions were bizarre or the
hallucination consisted of a voice keeping up a running commentary on the
person’s behaviour or thoughts. The next edition of the DSM is not due until
the year 2010.

In place of a process of a labelling which brought alienation and often
detention, sectioning, and mind altering anti-psychotic medication, many
psychoanalysts and psychotherapists felt that even in severe cases of schizoid
withdrawal we were not necessarily wasting our time in attempting to restore
health by the difficult work of unravelling experiences in order to make sense
of an illness. In this way, psychoanalysis has been, in its most radical form, a
critic of a society, which failed to exercise imaginative empathy when passing
judgement on people. The work of Harry Stack Sullivan, Frieda Fromm-
Reichmann, Harold Searles or R.D. Laing - all trained as psychiatrists and all
of them rebels against the standard procedures – provided a way of working
with people very different from the psychiatric model, which seemed to
encourage a society to repress its sickness by making a clearly split off group
the carriers of it.  A psychiatrist in a mental hospital once joked to me, with
some truth, when I commented on the number of carrier bags carried by
many of the medicated patients around the hospital grounds, that they
assessed the progress of the patient in terms of the reduction of the number
of carrier bags. It is too often difficult to believe, however, when hearing the
history of a life, that the “schizophrenic” was not suffering the effects of
having been made, consciously and unconsciously, the carefully concealed
carrier of the ills of the family.

For someone who felt his mind was going to pieces, to be put into the
stressful situation of the psychiatric examination, even when the psychiatrist
acquitted himself with kindness, the situation of the assessment procedure
itself, can be ‘an effective way to drive someone crazy, or more crazy.’ (Laing,
1985, p 17).  But if the accounting of bizarre experiences more or less
guaranteed you a new label or a trip to the psychiatric ward, there is even
more reason for a new group of people to be outraged about how their
symptoms are being diagnosed.  A doubly cruel sentence is being imposed
on people who are the victims of the most appalling abuse by scientific-
military experiments, and a totally uncomprehending society is indifferent to
their evidence. For the development of a new class of weaponry now has the
capability of entering the brain and mind and body of another person by
technological means.

Harnessing neuroscience to military capability, this technology is the result of
decades of research and experimentation, most particularly in the Soviet
Union and the United States. (Welsh, 1997, 2000) We have failed to
comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of
the arms race between the soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using
satellite technology not only for surveillance and communication systems but
also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by directing
laser beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves,
radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and by use of
these or other energy fields which form the areas of study for astro-physics.
Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable that the
methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere,
our natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications
of their use. The patents deriving from Bernard J. Eastlund’s work provide the
ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth’s atmosphere at
strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if
random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better
controlled than accomplished by the prior art, the detonation of nuclear
devices at various yields and various altitudes. (ref High Frequency Active
Auroral Research Project, HAARP).

Some patents, now owned by Raytheon, describe how to make “nuclear sized
explosions without radiation” and describe power beam systems,
electromagnetic pulses and over-the-horizon detection systems. A more
disturbing use is the system developed for manipulating and disturbing the
human mental process using pulsed radio frequency radiation (RFR), and their
use as a device for causing negative effects on human health and thinking.
The victim, the innocent civilian target is locked on to, and unable to evade
the menace by moving around. The beam is administered from space.  The
Haarp facility as military technology could be used to broadcast global mind-
control, as a system for manipulating and disturbing the human mental
process using pulsed radio frequency (RFR). The super-powerful radio waves
are beamed to the ionosphere, heating those areas, thereby lifting them. The
electromagnetic waves bounce back to the earth and penetrate human tissue.

Dr Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-Correction in Moscow, says: “It is
easily conceivable that some Russian ‘Satan’, or let’s say Iranian – or any
other ‘Satan’, as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances, can
inject himself into every conceivable computer network, into every
conceivable radio or television broadcast, with relative technological ease,
even without disconnecting cables…and intercept the radio waves in the ether
and modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. This is why such
technology is rightfully feared.”(German TV documentary, 1998).

If we were concerned before about diagnostic criteria being imposed
according to the classification of recognizable  symptoms, we have reason
now to submit them to even harsher scrutiny. The development over the last
decades since the Cold War arms race has included as a major strategic
category, psycho-electronic weaponry, the ultimate aim of which is to enter
the brain and mind. Unannounced, undebated and largely unacknowledged
by scientists or by the governments who employ them – technology to enter
and control minds from a distance has been unleashed upon us. The only
witnesses who are speaking about   this terrible technology with its appalling
implications for the future, are the victims themselves and those who are
given the task of diagnosing mental illness are attempting to silence them by
classifying their evidence and accounts as the symptoms of schizophrenia,
while the dispensers of psychic mutilation and programmed pain continue
with their work, aided and unopposed.

If it was always crucial, under the threat of psychiatric sectioning, to carefully
screen out any sign of confused speech, negativity, coldness, suspicion,
bizarre thoughts, sixth sense, telepathy, premonitions, but above all the
sense that “others can feel my feelings, and that someone seemed to be
keeping up a running commentary on your thoughts and behaviour,” then
reporting these to a psychiatrist, or anyone else for that matter who was not
of a mind to believe that such things as mind-control could exist, would be
the end of your claim to sanity and probably your freedom. For one of the
salient characteristics of mind-control is the running commentary, which
replicates so exactly, and surely not without design, the symptoms of
schizophrenia. Part of the effort is to remind the victim that they are
constantly under control or surveillance. Programmes vary, but common
forms of reminders are electronic prods and nudges, body noises, twinges
and cramps to all parts of the body, increasing heart beats, applying
pressures to internal organs – all with a personally codified system of
comments on thoughts and events, designed to create stress, panic and
desperation. This is mind control at its most benign. There is reason to fear
the use of beamed energy to deliver lethal assaults on humans, including
cardiac arrest, and bleeding in the brain.

It is the government system of secrecy, which has facilitated this appalling
prospect. There have been warning voices. “…the government secrecy system
as a whole is among the most poisonous legacies of the Cold War …the Cold
War secrecy (which) also mandate(s) Active Deception…a security manual for
special access programs authorizing contractors to employ ‘cover stories to
disguise their activities.  The only condition is that cover stories must be
believable.” (Aftergood &amp; Rosenberg, 1994; Bulletin of Atomic Scientist).
Paranoia has been aided and abetted by government intelligence agencies.

In the United Kingdom the fortifications against any disturbing glimmer of
awareness of such actual or potential outrages against human rights and
social and political abuses seem to be cast in concrete.  Complete with
crenellations, ramparts and parapets, the stronghold of nescience reigns
supreme.  To borrow Her Majesty the Queen’s recent observation: “There are
forces at work of which we are not aware.”  One cannot say that there is no
British Intelligence on the matter, as it is quite unfeasible that the existence
of the technology is not classified information. Indeed it is a widely held
belief that the women protesting against the presence of cruise missiles at
Greenham Common were victims of electro-magnetic radiation at gigahertz
frequency by directed energy weapons, and that their symptoms, including
cancer, were consistent with such radiation effects as reported by Dr Robert
Becker who has been a constantly warning voice against the perils of electro-
magnetic radiation. The work of Allen Frey suggests that we should consider
radiation effects as a grave hazard  producing increased permeability of the
blood-brain barrier, and weakening crucial defenses of the central  nervous
system against toxins. (Becker, 1985, p. 286).  Dr Becker has written about
nuclear magnetic resonance as a familiar tool in medecine known as magnetic
resonance imaging or MRI. Calcium efflux is the result of cyclotronic
resonance which latter can be explained  thus: If a charged particle or ion is
exposed to a steady magnetic field in space, it will begin to go into a circular
or orbital, motion at right angles to the applied magnetic field.The speed with
which it orbits will be determined by the ratio between the charge and the
mass of the particle and by the strength of the magnetic field. (Becker,
1990,p.235) The implications of this for wide scale aggression by using a
combination of radar based energy and the use of nuclear resonating are
beyond the scope of the writer, but appear to be worth the very serious
consideration of physicists in assessing how  they might be used against
human beings.

Amongst medical circles, however, it has so far not been possible for the
writer to find a neuroscientist, neurologist or a psychiatrist, nor for that
matter, a general medical practitioner, who acknowledges even the potential
for technological manipulation of the nervous system as a problem requiring
their professional interest. There has been exactly this response from some
of England’s most eminent practitioners of the legal profession, not
surprisingly, because the information about such technology is not made
available to them. They would refer anyone attempting to communicate
mind- harassment as a psychiatric problem, ignoring the crime that is being
committed.

The aim here is not to attempt a comprehensive history and development of
the technology of mind control. These very considerable tasks - which have
to be done under circumstances of the most extreme difficulty - have been
addressed with clarity and courage by others, who live with constant harm
and threats, not least of all contemptuous labelling. Their work can be readily
accessed on the internet references given at the end of this paper. For a well-
researched outline of the historical development of electro-magnetic
technology the reader should refer to the timeline of dates and
electromagnetic weapon development by Cheryl Welsh, president of Citizens
against Human Rights Abuse. (Welsh 1997; 2001). There are at least one and
a half thousand people worldwide who state they are being targeted. Mojmir
Babacek, now domiciled in his native Czech Republic, after eight years of
residence in the United States in the eighties, has made a  painstakingly
meticulous review of the technology, and continues his research. (Babacek
1998, 2002)

We are concerned here with reinforcing in the strongest possible terms:

i) The need for such abuses to human rights and the threats to democracy to
be called to consciousness, and without further delay.

ii) To analyse the reasons why people might defend themselves from
becoming conscious of the existence of such threats.

iii) To address the urgent need for intelligence, imagination, and information
- not to mention compassion  - in dealing with the victims of persecution
from this technology, and

iv) To alert a sleeping society, to the imminent threats to their freedom from
the threat from fascist and covert operations who have in all probability
gained control of potentially lethal weaponry of the type we are describing.


It is necessary to emphasise that at present there is not even the means for
victims to gain medical attention for the effects of radiation from this
targeting. Denied the respect of credulity of being used as human guinea
pigs, driven to suicide by the breakdown of their lives, they are treated as
insane – at best regarded as ‘sad cases’.  Since the presence of a permanent
‘other’ in one’s mind and body is by definition an act of the most intolerable
cruelty, people who are forced to bear it but who refuse to be broken by it,
have no other option than to turn themselves into activists, their lives
consumed by the battle against such atrocities, their energies directed to
alerting and informing the public of things they don’t want to hear or
understand about evil forces at work in their society.
It is necessary, at this point, to briefly outline a few – one might say the
precious few – attempts by public servants to verify the existence and
dangers inherent in this field:


 In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics
Committee was held in Paris. Its chairman, Jean-Pierre Changeux, a
neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the meeting that “advances
in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense.
Although the equipment needed is still highly specialized, it will become
commonplace and capable of being used at a distance. That will open the way
for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty, control of behaviour and
brainwashing. These are far from being science-fiction concerns…and
constitute “a serious risk to society.” (“Nature.” Vol 391, 1998.
 In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls “
for an international convention introducing a global ban on all development
and deployment of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of
human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented
without the global pressure of the informed general public on the
governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the
real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy
and to apply pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world
to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these devices to both
government and private organisations as well as individuals.”  (Plenary
sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
 In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the
House of Representatives which, it was hoped would be extremely important
in the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic mind control
experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill was
referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee on
Armed Services and International Relations. In the original bill a ban was
sought on ‘exotic weapons’ including electronic, psychotronic or information
weapons, chemtrails, particle beams, plasmas, electromagnetic radiation,
extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation,
or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the
basing of weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or
damage objects in space, there is no mention in the revised bill of any of the
aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use of satellite or radar
or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology
designed for deployment against the minds of human beings. (Space
Preservation Act, 2002)
In reviewing the development of the art of mind-invasive technology– there
are a few outstanding achievements to note:
In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book: “Physical
Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society”. In essence, he
displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of electrical stimulation
of the brain which had been mapped out in its relations between different
points and activities, functions and sensations, - by means of electrical
stimulation, how the rhythm of breathing and heartbeat could be changed, as
well as the function of most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion.
Frowning, opening and closing of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep,
dizziness, epileptic seizures in healthy persons were induced. The intensity of
feelings could be controlled by turning the knob, which controlled the
intensity of the electric current. He states at the end of his book the hope that
the new power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite for the
benefit of a “psychocivilized society.”

In the 1980’s the neuromagnetometer was developed which functions as an
antenna and could monitor the patterns emerging from the brain. (In the
seventies the scientists had discovered that electromagnetic pulses enabled
the brain to be stimulated through the skull and other tissues, so there was
no more need to implant electrodes in the brain). The antenna, combined
with the computer, could localize the points in the brain where the brain
events occur. The whole product is called the magnetoencephalograph.

In January 2000 the Lockheed Martin neuroengineer Dr John D. Norseen, was
quoted (US News and World Report, 2000) as hoping to turn the
electrohypnomentalaphone, a mind reading machine, into science fact. Dr
Norseen, a former Navy pilot, claims his interest in the brain stemmed from
reading a Soviet book in the 1980’s claiming that research on the mind would
revolutionize the military and society at large. By a process of deciphering the
brain’s electrical activity, electromagnetic pulsations would trigger the release
of the brain’s own transmitters to fight off disease, enhance learning, or alter
the mind’s visual images, creating a ‘synthetic reality’. By this process of
BioFusion, (Lockheed Martin, 2000) information is placed in a database, and a
composite model of the brain is created. By viewing a brain scan recorded by
(functional) magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, scientists can tell
what the person was doing at the time of recording – say reading or writing,
or recognise emotions from love to hate. “If this research pans out”, says
Norseen, “you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before
they know it.” But Norseen says he is ‘agnostic’ on the moral ramifications,
that he’s not a mad scientist – just a dedicated one. “The ethics don’t concern
me,” he says, “but they should concern someone else.”

The next big thing looks like being something which we might refer to as a
neurocomputer but it need not resemble a laptop – it may be reducible to
whatever size is convenient for use, such as a small mobile phone. Arising
from a break-through and exploitation of PSI-phenomena, it may be
modelled on the nervous-psychic activity of the brain – that is, as an
unbalanced, unstable system of neurotransmitters and interacting neurones,
the work having been derived from the creation of a copy of a living brain –
accessed by chance,  and ESP and worked on by design.


On receiving a communication from the writer on the feasibility of a machine
being on the horizon which, based on the project of collecting
electromagnetic waves emanating from the brain and transmitting them into
another brain that would read a person’s thoughts, or using the same
procedure in order to impose somebody else’s thoughts on another brain and
in this way direct his actions – there was an unequivocal answer from IBM at
executive level that there was no existing technology to create such a
computer in the foreseeable future. This is at some variance with the locating
of a patent numbered 03951134 on the Internet pages of IBM Intellectual
Property Network for a device, described in the patent, as capable of picking
up at a distance the brain waves of a person, process them by computer and
emit correcting waves which will change the original brain waves. Similar
letters addressed to each of the four top executives of Apple Inc., in four
individual letters marked for their personal attention, produced absolutely no
response. This included the ex- Vice President of the United States, Mr Al
Gore, newly elected to the Board of Directors of Apple.

Enough people have been sufficiently concerned by the reports of victims of
mind control abuse to organise The Geneva Forum, in 2002, held as a joint
initiative of the Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva; the United Nations
Institute for Disarmament Research; the International Committee of the Red
cross, and the Human Rights Watch (USA), and Citizens against Human Rights
Abuses (CAHRA); and the Programme for Strategic and International Security
Studies, which was represented by the Professor and Senior Lecturer from the
Department of Peace Studies at the University of Bradford.

In England, on May 25, 1995, the Guardian newspaper in the U.K. carried an
article based on a report by Nic Lewer, the peace researcher from Bradford
University, which listed “more than 30 different lines of research into ‘new
age weapons’…”some of the research sounds even less rational. There are,
according to Lewer, plans for ‘pulsed microwave beams’ to destroy enemy
electronics, and separate plans for very-low-frequency sound beams to
induce vomiting, bowel spasm, epileptic seizures and also crumble masonry.”
Further, the article states, “There are plans for ‘mind control’ with the use of
&#39;psycho-correction messages’ transmitted by subliminal audio and visual
stimuli. There is also a plan for ‘psychotronic weapons’ – apparently the
projection of consciousness to other locations – and another to use
holographic projection to disseminate propaganda and
misinformation.” (Welsh, Timeline). Apart from this notable exception it is
difficult to locate any public statement of the problem in the United Kingdom.

Unfortunately, the problem of credulity does not necessarily cease with
frequent mention, as in the United States, in spite of the number of reported
cases, there is still not sufficient public will to make strenuous protest against
what is not only already happening, but against what will develop if left
unchecked. It appears that the administration believes that it is necessary and
justifiable, in the interests of national security, to make experimental human
sacrifices, to have regrettable casualties, for there to be collateral damage, to
suffer losses in place of strife or war.  This is, of course, totally incompatible
with any claims to be a democratic nation which respects the values of human
life and democracy, and such an administration which tutors its servants in
the ways of such barbaric tortures must be completely condemned as
uncivilised and hypocritical.


Disbelief as a Defence Mechanism

In the face of widespread disbelief about mind-control, it seems worth
analysing the basis of the mechanisms employed to maintain disbelief:

i) In the sixties, Soviet dissidents received a significant measure of sympathy
and indignant protest from western democracies on account of their
treatment, most notedly the abuse of psychiatric methods of torture to which
they were subjected. It is noteworthy that we seem to be able to access
credulity, express feelings of indignant support when we can identify with
victims, who share and support our own value system, and who, in this
particular historical case, reinforced our own values, since they were
protesting against a political system which also  threatened us at that time.
Psychologically, it is equally important to observe that support from a safe
distance, and the benefits to the psyche of attacking a split-off  ‘bad father’,
the soviet authorities in this case, presents no threat to one’s internal system;
indeed it relieves internal pressures.  On the other hand, recognizing and
denouncing a similar offence makes very much greater psychic demands of
us when it brings us into conflict with our own environment, our own
security, our own reality.  The defence against disillusion serves to suppress
paranoia that our father figure, the president, the prime minister, our
governments - might not be what they would like to be seen to be.

ii) The need to deposit destructive envy and bad feelings elsewhere, on
account of the inability of the ego to acknowledge ownership of them -
reinforces the usefulness of persons or groups, which will serve to contain
those, disowned, projected feelings which arouse paranoid anxieties. The
concepts of mind-invasion strike at the very heart of paranoid anxiety,
causing considerable efforts to dislodge them from the psyche. The
unconscious identification of madness with dirt or excrement is an important
aspect of anal aggression, triggering projective identification as a defence.

iii) To lay oneself open to believing that a person is undergoing the
experience of being invaded mentally and physically by an unseen
manipulator requires very great efforts in the self to manage dread.


iv) The defence against the unknown finds expression in the split between
theory and practice; between the scientist as innovator and the society who
can make the moral decisions about his inventions; between fact and science
fiction, the latter of which can present preposterous challenges to the
imagination without undue threat, because it serves to reinforce a separation
from the real.

v) Identification with the aggressor. Sadistic fantasies, unconscious and
conscious, being transferred on to the aggressor and identified with, aid the
repression of fear of passivity, or a dread of punishment. This mechanism
acts to deny credulity to the victim who represents weakness. This is a
common feature of satanic sects.

vi) The liberal humanist tradition which denies the worst destructive
capacities of man in the effort to sustain the belief in the great continuity of
cultural and scientific tradition; the fear, in one’s own past development, of
not being ‘ongoing’, can produce the psychic effect of reversal into the
opposite to shield against aggressive feelings. This becomes then the
exaggerated celebration of the ‘new’ as the affirmation of human genius
which will ultimately be for the good of mankind, and which opposes warning
voices about scientific advances as being pessimistic, unenlightened,
unprogressive and Luddite.  Strict adherence to this liberal position can act as
overcompensation for a fear of envious spoiling of good possessions, i.e.
cultural and intellectual goods.

vii) Denial by displacement is also employed to ignore the harmful aspects of
technology. What may be harmful for the freedom and good of society can be
masked and concealed by the distribution of new and entertaining novelties.
The technology, which puts a camera down your gut for medical purposes, is
also used to limit your freedom by surveillance. The purveyors of innovative
technology come up with all sorts of new gadgets, which divert, entertain and
feed the acquisitive needs of insatiable shoppers, and bolster the economy.
The theme of “Everything’s up to date in Kansas City” only takes on a
downside when individual experience – exploding breast implants, say – takes
the gilt off the gingerbread. Out of every innovation for evil (i.e. designed for
harming and destroying) some ‘good’  (i.e. public diversion or entertainment)
can be promoted for profit or crowd-pleasing.

viii) Nasa is sending a spacecraft to Mars, or so we are told.  They plan to
trundle across the Martian surface searching for signs of water and life. We
do not hear dissenting voices about  its feasibility.

Why is it that, when a person accounts that their mind is being disrupted and
they are being persecuted by an unseen method of invasive technology, that
we cannot bring ourselves to believe them?  Could it be that the horror
involved in the empathic identification required brings the shutters down?
Conversely, the shared experience of the blasting of objects into space brings
with it the possibilities of shared potency or the relief  that resonates in the
unconscious of a massive projection or evacuation – a shared experience
which is blessed in the name of man’s scientific genius.

ix) The desire ‘not to be taken in’, not to be taken for a fool, provides one of
the most powerful and common defence mechanism against credulity.


Power, Paranoia and Unhealthy Governments

The ability to be the bearer and container of great power without succumbing
to the pressures of latent narcissistic psychoses is an important matter too
little considered. The effect of holding power and the expectation and the
need to be seen as capable of sustaining it, if not exercising it, encourages
omnipotence of thought. In the wake of this, a narcissistic overevaluation of
the subject’s own mental processes may set in. In the effort to hold himself
together as the possessor, container and executor of power, he (or indeed,
she) may also, undergo a process of splitting which allows him, along with
others, to bear enthralled witness of himself in this illustrious role. This may
mean that the seat of authority is vacated, at least at times. The splitting
process between the experiencing ego and the perceiving ego allows the
powerful leader to alternate his perception of himself inside and outside,
sometimes beside, himself. With the reinforcement of himself from others as
his own narcissistic object, reality testing is constrained.  In this last respect,
he has much in common with the other powerful figure of the age, the movie
star. or by those, in Freud’s words, who are “ruined by success.”

In a world, which is facing increasing disillusion about the gulf between the
public platforms on which governments are elected, and the contingencies
and pragmatics of retaining defence strategies and economic investments,
the role of military and intelligence departments, with their respective tools of
domination and covert infiltration, is increasingly alarming.  Unaccountable to
the public, protected from exposure and prosecution by their immunity,
licensed to lie as well as to kill, it is in the hands of these agents that very
grave threats to human rights and freedom lies. Empowered to carry out
aggression through classified weapon experimentation which is undetectable,
these men and women are also open to corruption from lucrative offers of
financial reward from powerful and sinister groups who can utilize their skills,
privileged knowledge and expertise for frankly criminal and fascist purposes.


Our information about the psychological profiles of those who are employed
to practice surveillance on others is limited, but it is not difficult to imagine
the effects on the personality that would ensue with the persistent practice of
such an occupation, so constantly exposed to the perversions. One gains little
snatches of insight here and there. In his book on CIA mind control research
(Marks, 1988), John Marks quotes a CIA colleague’s joke (always revealing for
personality characteristics): “If you could find the natural radio frequency of a
person’s sphincter, you could make him run out of the room real fast.” (One
wonders if the same amusement is derived from the ability to apply, say
infra-sound above 130 decibels, which is said to cause stoppage of the heart,
according to one victim/activist from his readings of a report for the Russian
Parliament.)

Left to themselves, these servants of the state may well feel exempt from the
process of moral self-scrutiny, but the work must be dehumanising for the
predator as well as the prey. It is probably true that the need to control their
agents in the field was an incentive to develop the methods  in use today. It is
also an effectively brutalising training for persecuting others. Meanwhile the
object, the prey, in a bid for not only for survival but also in a desperate effort
to warn his or her fellows about what is going on, attempts to turn himself
into a quantum physicist, a political researcher, a legal sleuth, an activist, a
neurologist, a psychologist, a physiologist – his own doctor, since he cannot
know what effects this freakish treatment might have on his body, let alone
his mind. There are always new methods to try out which might prove useful
in the search to find ways of disabling and destroying opponents – air
injected into brains and lungs, lasers to strike down or blind, particle beams,
sonar waves, or whatever combination of energies to direct, or destabilise or
control.

Science and Scepticism

Scientists can be bought, not just by governments, but also by sinister and
secret societies.  Universities can be funded by governments to develop
technology for unacceptably inhumane uses.  The same people who deliver
the weapons - perhaps respected scientists and academics - may cite the
acceptable side of scientific discoveries, which have been developed by
experimenting on unacknowledged, unfortunate people. In a cleaned up
form, they are then possibly celebrated as a break-through in the
understanding of the natural laws of the universe. It is not implausible that
having delivered the technical means for destruction, the innovator and
thinker goes on, wearing a different hat, to receive his (or her) Nobel Prize.
There are scientists who have refused to continue to do work when they were
approached by CIA and Soviet representatives. These are the real heroes of
science.

In the power struggle, much lies at stake in being the first to gain control of
ultimate mind-reading and mind-controlling technology. Like the nuclear
bomb, common ownership would seem by any sane calculations to cancel out
the advantage of possession, but there is always a race to be the first to
possess the latest ultimate means of mass destruction.  The most desirable
form is one that can be directed at others without contaminating oneself in
the process - one that can be undetected and neatly, economically and
strategically delivered. We should be foolish to rule out secret organisations,
seeing threat only from undemocratic countries and known terrorist groups.

As consumers in a world which is increasingly one in which shopping is the
main leisure activity, we should concern ourselves to becoming alert to the
ways in which human welfare may have been sacrificed to produce an
awesome new gadget. It may be the cause for celebration for the ‘innovator’,
but brought about as the result of plugging in or dialling up the living
neuronal processes of an enforced experimentee.  If we are concerned not to
eat boiled eggs laid by battery hens, we might not regard it morally irrelevant
to scrutinise the large corporations producing electronically innovative
‘software.’ We might also be wary about the origins of the sort of bland
enticements of dating agencies who propose finding your ideal partner by
matching up brain frequencies and ‘bio-rhythms’.

We do not know enough about  the background of such technology, nor how
to evaluate it ethically. We do not know about its effects on the future,
because we are not properly informed. If governments persist in concealing
the extent of their weapon capability in the interests of defence, they are also
leaving their citizens disempowered of the right to protest against their
deployment. More alarmingly, they are leaving their citizens exposed to their
deployment by ruthless organisations whose concerns are exactly the
opposite of democracy and human rights.


Back in the United Kingdom

Meanwhile, back in England, the Director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive
Neuroscience, Professor Colin Blakemore, also the elective Chief Executive of
the Medical Research Council writes to the author that he “... knows of no
technology  (not even in the wildest speculations of neuroscientists) for
scanning and collecting ‘neuronal data’ at a distance.” (Blakemore, 2003, )
This certitude is at distinct variance with the fears of other scientists in Russia
and the United States, and not least of all with the fears of the French
neuroscientist, Jean-Pierre Changeux of the French National Bioethics
Committee already quoted (see page 5). It is also very much at odds with the
writing of Dr Michael Persinger from the Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory
at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. His article “On the
Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic
Induction of Algorithms” (1995), he describes the ways that individual
differences among human brains can be overcome and comes to a conclusion
about the technological possibilities of influencing a major part of the
approximately six billion people on this planet without mediation through
classical sensory modalities but by generating electromagnetic induction of
fundamental algorithms in the atmosphere. Dr Persinger’s work is referred to
by Captain John Tyler whose work for the American Air Force and Aerospace
programmes likens the human nervous system to a radio receiver. (1990)

Very recently the leading weekly cultural BBC radio review had as one of its
guests, the eminent astro-physicist and astronomer royal, Sir Martin Rees,
who has recently published a book, “Our Final Century”, in which he makes a
sober and reasoned case for the fifty-fifty chance that millions of people,
probably in a ‘third-world country’ could be wiped out in the near future
through biotechnology and bio-terrorism – “by error or malign release.” He
spoke of this devastation as possibly coming from small groups or cults,
based in the United States. “…few individuals with the right technology to
cause absolute mayhem.”  He also said that in this century, human nature is
no longer a fixed commodity, that perhaps we should contemplate the
possibility that humans would even have implants in the brain.

The other guests on this programme were both concerned with Shakespeare,
one a theatre producer and the other a writer on Shakespeare, while his
remaining guest was a young woman who had a website called “Spiked”, the
current theme of which was Panic Attack, that is to say, Attack on Panic. This
guest vigorously opposed what she felt was the pessimism of Sir Martin,
regarding his ideas as essentially eroding trust, and inducing panic. This
reaction seems to typify one way of dealing with threat and anxiety, and
demonstrates  the difficulty that a warning voice, even from  a man of the
academic distinction of Martin Rees, has in alerting people to that which they
do not want to hear. This flight reaction was reinforced by the presenter who
summed up the morning’s discussion at the end of the programme with the
words:  “We have a moral! Less panic, more Shakespeare!”


The New Barbarism

Since access to a mind-reading machine will enable the operator to access
the ideas of another person, we should prepare ourselves for a new world
order in which ideas will be, as it were, up for grabs.  We need not doubt that
the contents of another’s mind will be scooped up, scooped out, sorted
through as if the event was a jumble sale. The legal profession would
therefore be well advised to consider the laws on Intellectual Property very
judiciously in order to acquit themselves with any degree of authenticity. We
should accustom ourselves to the prospect of recognizing our work coming
out of the mouth of another. The prospect of wide-scale fraud, and someone
posturing in your stolen clothes will not be a pretty sight.  The term “personal
mind enhancement”  is slipping in through the back door, to borrow a term
used by the Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, and it
is being done through technologically-induced mental co-ercion – mind
raping and looting.  In place of, or in addition to, cocaine, we may expect to
see ‘mind-enhanced’ performances on “live” television.

The brave new science of neuropsychiatry and brain mapping hopes to find
very soon, with the fMRI scanner - this “brand new toy that scientists have
got their hands on” - “the blob for love” and “the blob for guilt”, (BBC Radio 4:
All in the Mind, 5 March, 2003). Soon we will be able to order a brain scan for
anyone whose behaviour strikes us as odd or bizarre, and the vicissitudes of
a life need no longer trouble us in our diagnostic assessments. In his recent
Reith Lectures for the BBC (2003), Professor Ramachandran, the celebrated
neuroscientist from the La Hoya Institute in San Diego, California, has
demonstrated for us many fascinating things that the brain can do. He has
talked to us about personality disorders and shown that some patients, who
have suffered brain damage from head injury, do not have the capacity to
recognise their mothers. Others feel that they are dead. And indeed he has
found brain lesions in these people. In what seems to be an enormous but
effortless leap, the self-styled “kid in a candy store” is now hoping to prove
that all schizophrenics, have damage to the right hemisphere of the brain,
which results in the inability to distinguish between fantasy (sic) and reality.
Since  Professor Ramachandran speaks of schizophrenia in the same breath
as denial of illness, or agnosia, it is not clear, and it would be interesting to
know, whether the person with the head injury has been aware or unaware of
the head injury. Also does the patient derive comfort and a better chance at
reality testing when he is told of the lesion?  Does he feel better when he has
received the diagnosis? And what should the psychoanalysts – and the
psychiatrists, - feel about all those years of treating people of whose head
injuries they were absolutely unaware? Was this gross negligence? Were we
absolutely deluded in perceiving recovery in a sizeable number of them?

It is, however, lamentable that a neuroscientist with a professed interest in
understanding schizophrenia should seek to provide light relief to his
audience by making jokes about schizophrenics being people who are
“convinced that the CIA has implanted devices in their brain to control their
thoughts and actions, or that aliens are controlling them.”  (Reith Lecture, No
5, 2003).

There is a new desire for concretisation. The search for meaning has been
replaced by the need for hard proof. If it doesn’t light up or add up it doesn’t
have validity. The physician of the mind has become a surgeon. “He found a
lump as big as a grapefruit!”

Facing up to the Dread and Fear of the Uncanny

Freud believed that an exploration of the uncanny would be a major direction
of exploration of the mind in this century. The fear of the uncanny has been
with us for a very long time. The evil eye, or the terrifying double, or intruder,
is a familiar theme in literature, notably of Joseph Conrad in The Secret
Sharer, and Maupassant’s short story, Le Horla. Freud’s analysis of the
uncanny led him back to the old animistic conception of the universe: “…it
seems as if each one of us has been through a phase of individual
development corresponding to the animistic phase in primitive men, that
none of us has passed through it without preserving certain residues and
traces of it which are still capable of manifesting themselves, and that
everything which now strikes us as ‘uncanny’ fulfils the condition of touching
those residues of animistic mental activity within us and bringing them to
expression.” (Freud: 1919. p.362)

The separation of birth, and the childhood fear of ‘spooks in the night’, also
leave their traces in each and every one of us. The individual experience of
being alone in one’s mind – the solitary fate of man which has never been
questioned before, and upon which the whole history of civilised nurture is
based - is now assaulted head-on.  Since growing up is largely synonymous
with acceptance of one’s aloneness, the effort to assuage it is the basis for
compassion and protection of others; it is the matrix for the greatest good,
that of ordinary human kindness, and is at the heart of the communicating
power of great art. Even if we must all live and die alone, we can at least
share this knowledge in acts of tenderness which atone for our lonely state.
In times of loss and mental breakdown, the starkness of this aloneness is all
too clear.  The best of social and group constructiveness is an effort to allay
the psychotic anxieties that lie at the base of every one of us, and which may
be provoked under extreme enough conditions.

The calculated and technological entry into another person’s mind is an act of
monumental barbarism which obliterates– perhaps with the twiddling of a dial
– the history and civilisation of man’s mental development. It is more than an
abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of meaning. For any one who is
forced into the hell of living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay
sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance.  The imaginative capacity of
the ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it.  We have attempted to
come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We
now have the prospect of systematic control authorised by men who issue
instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of societies
while they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.

This is essentially about humiliation, and disempowerment. It is a
manifestation of rage acted out by those who fear impotence with such
dread, that their whole effort is directed into the emasculation and
destruction of the terrifying rival of their unconscious fantasies. In this
apocalypse of the mind the punitive figure wells up as if out of the bowels of
the opera  stage, and this phantasmagoria is acted out on a global scale.
These men  may be mad enough to believe they are creating a
‘psychocivilised world order”. For anyone who has studied damaged children,
it is more resonant of the re-enactment from the unconscious, reinforced by
a life devoid of the capacity for empathic identification, of the obscenities of
the abused and abusing child in the savage nursery.  Other people -which
were to them like Action Man toys to be dismembered, or Barbie Dolls to be
obscenely defiled - become as meaningless in their humanity as pixillated
dots on a screen.

Although forced entry into a mind is by definition obscene, an abbreviated
assessment of the effects that  mind-invaded  people describe testifies  to the
perverted nature of the experiments.  Bizarre noises are emitted from the
body, a body known well enough by its owner to recognise the noises as
extrinsic; air is pumped in and out of orifices as if by a bicycle pump.
Gradually the repertoire is augmented - twinges and spasms to the eyes,
nose, lips, strange tics, pains in the head, ringing in the ears, obstructions in
the throat, pressure on the bowel and bladder causing incontinence; tingling
in the fingers, feet, pressures on the heart, on breathing, dizziness, eye
problems leading to cataracts; running eyes, running nose; speeding up of
heart beats and the raising of pressure in the heart and chest; breathing and
chest complaints leading to bronchitis and deterioration of the lungs;
agonizing migraines; being woken up at night, sometimes with terrifying jolts
; insomnia; intolerable levels of stress from the loss of one’s privacy. This
collection of assorted symptoms is a challenge to any medical practitioner to
diagnose.

There are, more seriously, if the afore-going is characterised as non-lethal,
the potential lethal effects since the capability of ultrasound and infra-sound
to cause cardiac arrest, and brain lesions, paralysis and blindness, as well as
blinding by laser beam, or inducing asphyxia by altering the frequencies
which control breathing in the brain, epileptic seizure – all these and others
may be at the fingertips of those who are developing them. And those who do
choose to use them may be sitting with the weapon, which resembles, say, a
compact mobile telephone, on the restaurant table next to the bottle of wine,
or beside them at the swimming pool.

Finally – if the victims at this point in the new history of this mind-control,
cannot yet prove their abuse, it must be asserted that, faced with the
available information about technological development – it is certainly not
possible for those seeking to evade such claims – to disprove them. To wait
until the effects become widespread will be too late.


For these and other reasons which this paper has attempted to address, we
would call for an acknowledgement of such technology at a national and
international level. Politicians, scientists and neurologists, neuroscientists,
physicists and the legal profession should, without further delay, demand
public debate on the existence and deployment of psychotronic technology;
and for the declassification of information about such devices which abuse
helpless people, and threaten democratic freedom.
Victims’ accounts of abuse should be admitted to public account, and the use
of psycho-electronic weapons should be made illegal and criminal,
The medical profession should be helped to recognise the symptoms of
mind-control and psychotronic abuse, and intelligence about their
deployment should be declassified so that this abuse can be seen to be what
it is, and not interpreted automatically as an indication of mental illness.

If, in the present confusion and insecurity about the search for evidence of
weapons of mass destruction, we conclude that failure to locate them -
whatever the truth of the matter –encourages us to be generally complacent,
then we shall be colluding with very dark forces at work if we conclude that a
course of extreme vigilance signifies paranoia. For there may well be other
weapons of mass destruction being developed and not so far from home;
weapons which, being even more difficult to locate, are developed invisibly,
unobstructed, unheeded in our midst, using human beings as test-beds. Like
ESP, the methods being used on humans have not been detectable using
conventional detection equipment. It is likely that the signals being used are
part of a physics not known to scientists without the highest level of security
clearance. To ignore the evidence of victims is to deny, perhaps with
catastrophic results, the  only evidence which might otherwise lead the
defenders of freedom to becoming alert to the development of a fearful new
methods of destruction. Manipulating terrorist groups and governments alike,
these sinister and covert forces may well be very thankful for the professional
derision of the victims, and for public ignorance.


Copyright - The Author

References

Laing, R.D. (1985) :  Wisdom, Madness and Folly: The Making of a
Psychiatrist. Macmillan, 1985

Welsh, Cheryl (1997): Timeline of Important Dates in the History of
Electromagnetic Technology and Mind Control, at:  www.dcn.davis.ca.us/
~welsh/timeline.htm

Welsh, Cheryl (2001):Electromagnetic Weapons: As powerful as the Atomic
Bomb, President Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse, CAHRA Home Page:
U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report: www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/emr13.htm

Begich, Dr N. and Manning, J.: 1995 Angels Don’t Play this HAARP, Advances
in Tesla Technology, Earthpulse Press.

ZDF TV:    “Secret Russia: Moscow – The Zombies of the Red Czars”, Script to
be published in Resonance,  No. 35

Aftergood, Steven and Rosenberg, Barbara: “The Soft Kill Fallacy”, in The
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Sept/Oct 1994.

Becker, Dr Robert:  1985,The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the
Foundation of Life, William Morrow, N.Y.

Babacek, Mojmir: International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of The
Human Nervous System: http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm and go
to: Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System

“Is it Feasible to Manipulate the Human Brain at a Distance?”
                                                www.aisjca-mft.org/braindist.htm

 “Psychoelectronic Threat to Democracy”  http://mindcontrolforums.com/
babacek.htm

Nature:  “Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights”, Vol, 391,
Jan. 22, 1998, p. 316; (ref Jean- Pierre Changeux)

Space Preservation Act: Bill H.R.2977 and HR 3616 IH in 107th Congress –
2nd Session: see: www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

Sessions European Parliament: www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?
redirected=1
Click at Plenary Sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number, click, choose
1999 and fill in oo5 to A4

Delgado, Jose M.R: 1969. “Physical Control  of the Mind: Towards a
Psychocivilized Society”, Vol. 41, World Perspectives, Harper Row, N.Y.

US News &amp; World Report:  Lockheed Martin Aeronautics/ Dr John Norseen;
Report January 3/10 2000, P.67

Freud, Sigmund:  1919: Art and Literature:” The Uncanny”.  Penguin,
Also  “Those Wrecked by Success.”

Marks, John:   1988 :The CIA and Mind Control – the Search for the
Manchurian Candidate,  ISBN 0-440-20137-3

Persinger, M.A. “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by
Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms”; In Perception and
Motor Skills,  June, 1995, vol. 80, p. 791 – 799

Tyler, J.“Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict,” in  “Low
Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology”,    ed. Lt. Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air
University Press, Centre For Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education,
Maxwell Air Force base, Alabama, June, 1986.

Rees, Martin Our Final Century:  2003, Heinemann.

Conrad, Joseph: The Secret Sharer, 1910.  Signet Classic.

Maupassant, Guy de: Le Horla, 1886. Livre de Poche.



Address for Correspondence
Carole Smith
E-mail: rockpool@dircon.co.uk

About Us The NaturoDoc Store Search This Site
Site Index The NaturoDoc
LIbrary
Health News
Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics
By Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD
Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland
December 6, 2000
In 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book, Cybernetics, defined as
a neurological communication and control theory already in use in
small circles at that time. Yoneji Masuda, &#34;Father of the
Information Society,&#34; stated his concern in 1980 that our liberty is
threatened Orwellian-style by cybernetic technology totally
unknown to most people. This technology links the brains of
people via implanted microchips to satellites controlled by
ground-based supercomputers.
The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the state
of Ohio, USA and also in Stockholm, Sweden. Brain electrodes
were inserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the
knowledge of their parents. In the 1950s and 60s, electrical
implants were inserted into the brains of animals and humans,
especially in the U.S., during research into behavior modification,
and brain and body functioning. Mind control (MC) methods were
used in attempts to change human behavior and attitudes.
Influencing brain functions became an important goal of military
and intelligence services.
Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in X-rays the size of one
centimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of
rice. They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide.
Today they are small enough to be inserted into the neck or back,
and also intravenously in different parts of the body during surgical
operations, with or without the consent of the subject. It is now
almost impossible to detect or remove them.
It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a
microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the
rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in
the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. In
Sweden, Prime Minister Olof Palme gave permission in 1973 to
implant prisoners, and Data Inspection&#39;s ex-Director General Jan
Freese revealed that nursing-home patients were implanted in the
mid-1980s. The technology is revealed in the 1972:47 Swedish
state report, Statens Officiella Utradninger (SOU).
Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain
functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even
altered through the changing of frequencies. Guinea pigs in secret
experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients,
handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single
women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people
considered &#34;marginal&#34; by the elite experimenters. The published
experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are
shocking to the conscience.
Today&#39;s microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio
waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted
person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique
was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl
Other articles on
public health:
America, You&#39;ve
Been Warned
About Vaccines!
Anthrax Vaccine is
Dangerous
Autism Linked to
Vaccines
Doctors are Third
Leading Cause of
Death in the U.S.
Hepatitis B Policy:
Dangerously
Misguided
Immunizations
Maine on Mercury
Toxicity
Natural Medicines
for Anthrax and
BioTerrorism
Smallpox
Outbreak: What to
Do
Dangers of
Smallpox
Vaccinations
Vaccines: Who
Makes Them, and
What&#39;s in Them?
NaturoDoc Home
Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI)
biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam
War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to
increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The
20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security
Agency (NSA) could now &#34;see and hear&#34; what soldiers experience
in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).
When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of
hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it
draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences,
smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once
transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be
projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be
reexperienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can
send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the
nervous system, affecting the target&#39;s performance. With RMS,
healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear
voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a
certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and
its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into
thoughts, pictures, and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can
therefore change a person&#39;s brainwaves and affect muscular
activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.
The NSA&#39;s electronic surveillance system can simultaneously
follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique
bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have
unique fingerprints. With electromagnetic frequency (EMF) brain
stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be
sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be
experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic warfare.
U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space
so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be
registered 24 hours a day.
The Washington Post reported in May 1995 that Prince William of
Great Britain was implanted at the age of 12. Thus, if he were ever
kidnapped, a radio wave with a specific frequency could be
targeted to his microchip. The chip’s signal would be routed
through a satellite to the computer screen of police headquarters,
where the Prince’s movements could be followed. He could
actually be located anywhere on the globe.
The mass media has not reported that an implanted person&#39;s
privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be
manipulated in many ways. Using different frequencies, the secret
controller of this equipment can even change a person&#39;s emotional
life. S/he can be made aggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can be
artificially influenced. Thought signals and subconscious thinking
can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the
knowledge or consent of the implanted person.
A perfect cyber-soldier can thus be created. This secret
technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO
countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic
populations having heard anything about it. Thus, little information
about such invasive mind-control systems is available in
professional and academic journals.
The NSA&#39;s Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor
information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials
(3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees
in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found
to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and
lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain
implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee
experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of
unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Mind control techniques can be used for political purposes. The
goal of mind controllers today is to induce the targeted persons or
groups to act against his or her own convictions and best interests.
Zombified individuals can even be programmed to murder and
remember nothing of their crime afterward. Alarming examples of
this phenomenon can be found in the U.S.
This “silent war” is being conducted against unknowing civilians
and soldiers by military and intelligence agencies. Since 1980,
electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) has been secretly used to
control people targeted without their knowledge or consent. All
international human rights agreements forbid nonconsensual
manipulation of human beings — even in prisons, not to speak of
civilian populations.
Under an initiative of U.S. Senator John Glenn, discussions
commenced in January 1997 about the dangers of radiating civilian
populations. Targeting people’s brain functions with
electromagnetic fields and beams (from helicopters and airplanes,
satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles,
electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the
radiation problem that should be addressed in democratically
elected government bodies.
In addition to electronic MC, chemical methods have also been
developed. Mind-altering drugs and different smelling gasses
affecting brain function negatively can be injected into air ducts or
water pipes. Bacteria and viruses have also been tested this way
in several countries.
Today&#39;s supertechnology, connecting our brain functions via
microchips (or even without them, according to the latest
technology) to computers via satellites in the U.S. or Israel, poses
the gravest threat to humanity. The latest supercomputers are
powerful enough to monitor the whole world’s population. What will
happen when people are tempted by false premises to allow
microchips into their bodies? One lure will be a microchip identity
card. Compulsory legislation has even been secretly proposed in
the U.S. to criminalize removal of an ID implant.
Are we ready for the robotization of mankind and the total
elimination of privacy, including freedom of thought? How many of
us would want to cede our entire life, including our most secret
thoughts, to Big Brother? Yet the technology exists to create a
totalitarian New World Order. Covert neurological communication
systems are in place to counteract independent thinking and to
control social and political activity on behalf of self-serving private
and military interests.
When our brain functions are already connected to
supercomputers by means of radio implants and microchips, it will
be too late for protest. This threat can be defeated only by
educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry and
information exchanged at international congresses.
One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the
widespread prestige of the psychiatric Diagnostic Statistical
Manual IV produced by the U.S. American Psychiatric Association
(APA) and printed in 18 languages. Psychiatrists working for U.S.
intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising
this manual. This psychiatric &#34;bible&#34; covers up the secret
development of MC technologies by labeling some of their effects
as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.
Victims of mind control experimentation are thus routinely
diagnosed, knee-jerk fashion, as mentally ill by doctors who
learned the DSM “symptom” list in medical school. Physicians
have not been schooled that patients may be telling the truth when
they report being targeted against their will or being used as
guinea pigs for electronic, chemical and bacteriological forms of
psychological warfare.
Time is running out for changing the direction of military medicine,
and ensuring the future of human freedom.
This article was originally published in the 36th-year edition of the
Finnish-language journal SPEKULA (3rd Quarter, 1999).
SPEKULA (circulation 6500) is a publication of Northern Finland
medical students and doctors of Oulu University OLK (Oulun
Laaketieteellinen Kilta). It is mailed to all medical students of
Finland and all Northern Finland medical doctors.

Copyright © 2003 NaturoDoc LLC. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to The NaturoDoc Newsletter Contact us


