================================================================
     MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 25
================================================================
     V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"
================================================================

Notes:

The following is reproduced here with the express permission of
the author/publisher.

Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
copy remain intact and unedited.

The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
otherwise noted.

Editor: Mike Coyle 

Contributing Editors: Walter Bowart
                      Alex Constantine

Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

Research: Darrell Bross

Editor's Note:

The Electronic Surveillance Project is no longer in operation
as of Sept. 1995.

================================================================

            Association of National Security Alumni
               Electronic Surveillance Project
                       P.O. Box 13625
                 Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625
                       (301) 608-3625

                         SUPPLEMENT
                        November 1993

Through a mere preliminary investigative finding, only, Microwave
Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation has invited criticism
in two areas in recent months; viz., (1) No substantive proof has
been furnished in this document which confirms that
directed-energy technologies exist; and (2) The persons whose
circumstances are discussed in this publication may simply be
mentally unbalanced.

In December 1992, when Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control
Experimentation was published, the U.S. Government
representatives routinely took the position that directed-energy
technologies were nothing more than mere figments of physicists'
imaginations, still on the drawing boards. Shortly following
publication of this report, information concerning these
technologies began to appear in some noteworthy organs as, The
Wall Street Journal, Defense News, Aviation Week & Space
Technology, Tactical Technology, Defense Electronics and, most
recently, The Washington Post.

In a flurry of activity in these past 10 months, directed-energy-
based surveillance and anti-personnel systems have suddenly
leaped off of physicists' drawing boards into the world of
reality, thus obviating the criticism, it would appear, that the
attached publication concerns non-existent technologies.

Indeed, directed-energy technologies appear to have evolved at
such a rapid rate that they are now being promoted as the "Final
Solution" to crime -- preliminarily, at a classified conference
sponsored by the Los Alamos National Laboratory, hosted by the
John Hopkins Applied Physics, and supported by the American
Defense Preparedness Association. 

Clearly, given this conference, data concerning the efficacy of
acoustical, how-power microwave, laser, ELF/RF weapons and
"psychotronic" systems is sufficient to allow for their now being
promoted as tools for law enforcement. What is note worthy in
this sudden flurry of activity is that no one has bothered to ask
the following very basic questions:

(1)  Where is the test data being obtained?

(2)  What, so far, has prevented this government and its
     contractors from testing these technologies on U.S. 
     citizens under involuntary circumstances?

Absent answers to -- or government interest -- these questions;
and because the symptoms experienced by those now in touch with
this Project parallel those reported in the media as being the
effects of directed-energy targeting, we conclude that no
restraints have been placed on those charged with the development
and testing of directed-energy systems; and the U.S. citizens are
indeed being experimented upon under involuntary circumstances.

It is in this context that we note that Los Alamos strongly
urges, in their brochure, that "industry" attend the
aforementioned classified conference, since "(i)ndustry,
particularly, will benefit from a more precise understanding
of...operational constraints regarding [these] technologies."
Perhaps "industry," as a minimum, will also be made to understand
that a failure to comprehend that said constraints will
ultimately lead to vigorous, civil rights-based prosecutions.

As to the alleged mental illness of the persons in touch with
this Project, it should be noted that government-sponsored
stalking and harassment, mind control experimentation and simple
torture can indeed produce symptoms which might be regarded as a
form of mental illness. Deliberate terrorization can take a toll.
Mental illness caused by government-sponsored terrorization,
however, does not invalidate that terrorization.

It should be noted that The American Psychiatric Association --
in its various revisions of the Diagnostic and Statistical of
Mental Illness -- seems to have conveniently omitted all
reference to harassment, stalking, mind-control experimentation
and torture as a case for mental illness. (The DSM is a
psychiatric profession's diagnostic "bible.") The APA's refusal
to acknowledge the impact of terrorization upon the human psyche,
even given the publicity stemming from the Church Committee's
findings in 1975, raises serious questions about the validity of
psychiatry as a profession in this country, not to mention, the
APA's ethical intent, in the long term.

Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation, published
in December 1992, furnishes an overview of complaints received
from 25 individuals as of that date. During these 11 intervening
months, the complaints received by this Project have more than
tripled. While the majority of these "experimentees" reside in
the United states, a number of virtually identical complaints
have also been received from England, Canada and Australia. It
would appear that these activities are also ongoing on the
European Continent, and the former Soviet Union. Connections
between this global pattern of activity and the objectives of the
so-called New World Order remain to be determined.

All categories of types of complaints being received by this
Project have also changed since publication of this report.
Survivors of certain satanic cults (alleged to protect the
interest of government and military "political satanists" in this
country; former Vietnam-era "programmed assassins," prison
inmates, and so-called "UFO abductees" are now reporting an
array of experiences (and symptoms) which are remarkable similar
to those addressed in this report. Experimental drugs, induce
auditory input, vicious overt harassment, attempted psychiatric
discrediting (unless the experimentee dutifully claims to be a
UFO abductee), and an extremely painful array of
externally-induced symptoms are included in this shared panoply
of experiences.

The impression created by these burgeoning complaints is that
mind-control experimentation in this country is being pursued in
at least five specific areas. Evidence is more recently surfacing
that unwitting government employees may qualify as yet another
category of experimentee -- those employees, in particular, who
are experiencing the effects of so-called "sick buildings."

It has been suggested that the long-term objective of all this
experimentation is to develop a system by which all (surviving)
citizens of this country can be monitored and tracked by a
sophisticated, perhaps satellite-based cybernetics system.
Certainly some of the research being dedicated to "mapping of the
brain" shows this potential. We are in receipt of preliminary
information which points to magnetic resonant imaging as being
critical to process. Our information is that far too many
physicians are urging patients to undergo unnecessary MRIs --
patients whose short-lived, if painful symptoms surfaced in 
so-called "sick buildings." We intend to look into this 
situation, of course.

The Electronic Surveillance Project is currently dedicated to
helping victims of directed-energy harassment and experimentation
to survive their respective ordeals until such time that Congress
can be persuaded to intervene. We do believe that polite,
precautionary comments concerning "a more precise understanding
of...operational constraints" should be delegated to government
agencies which have a primary role in development of these
technologies.

                            /Original signed/
                            JULIANNE MCKINNEY
                            Director,
                            Electronic Surveillance Project

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by federal
employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever
present -- and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding
scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we
must be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy
could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological
elite.

[President Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961]

"Covert actions are counterproductive and damaging to the
national interest of the United States. They are inimical to the
operation and effective national intelligence system, and
corruptive of civil liberties, including the functioning of the
judiciary and free press. Most importantly, they contradict the
principles of democracy, national self-determination and
international law in which the United States is publicly
committed."

[Credo of the Association of National Security Alumni]

----------------------------------------------------------------
                    
                    MICROWAVE HARASSMENT
                            AND
                 MIND-CONTROL EXPERIMENTATION

                    by Julianne McKinney
            
            Director, Electronic Surveillance Project
             Association of National Security Alumni
                       December 1992

Whither the KGB?

In February 1974, Georgetown University's Center for Strategic
and International Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight
of dissenters in the Soviet Union, and on a means by which the
U.S. Government might most effectively intervene. highlights of
these discussions are reported in "Understanding the Solzhenitzyn
Affair: Dissent and its Control in the USSR," (CSIS, 1974).

KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these
discussions. It was noted that the KGB's success depended on the
extensive use of informant networks and agent provocateurs; and,
following Brezhnev's rise to power, on the use of drugs and
psychiatrists for further purpose of manipulation and control.
Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related
tactics were also cited as serving KGB purpose. Participants in
the conference agreed that the KGB's obvious intent was to divide
and isolate the populace, to spread fear, and to silent
dissenters.

Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed
precisely these same tactics on a recurrent basis. The Church and
Rockefeller Committee Hearings in the mid-70's purportedly put an
end to these practices. Based on recent developments, it would
appear that the CIA's and FBI's Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and
Vice-President-level Hearings) were instead merely driven
underground. We are now in contact with a total of 25
individuals, scattered throughout the United states, who firmly
believe they are being harassed by agencies of the U.S.
Government. Others have been brought to our attention whom we
will be contacting in the future. The majority of these
individuals claim that their harassment and surveillance began 
in 1989.

The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns
bear a striking resemblance to those attributed to the CIA and
FBI during Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The only
difference now is that electronic harassment and experimentation
also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.

The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death
rattle, and the KGB no longer poses the threat which purportedly
served to justify the U.S. Government's resort to such operations
as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been
reduced to an increasingly distant memory.

Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations
in this country suggest that the KGB, as an institution, was
never the real threat. A KGB "mentality," which is underlying
pragmatic contempt for civil liberties, appears, instead, to have
been the driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO,
and the operations now being reported to us.

The KGB "mentality" is a matter of personal predilection, not
ideology. Its objective is power and control, regardless of human
cost. It is a corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on
fear, conformity and government funding.

Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these
complaints of government harassment and experimentation with an
admitted "high degree of caution."  We are no longer skeptical.
The growing numbers of independent complaints and the
similarities between those complaints cannot be ignored. Under
the circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a
"mentality," the KGB appears to be accomplishing more in "burying
this country" from within, than it could ever have hoped to have
achieved as an institution. It would appear that this country has
a serious problem on its hands which needs to be resolved.

Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July
edition of the association's publication, Unclassified,
preliminarily addresses the complaints brought to our attention
as of July 1992. Our objective, as noted, was to weigh the
legitimacy of those complaints in terms of the directed-energy
technologies reportedly involved. Part II discusses the overt and
covert patterns of harassment identified as a result of our
investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to
limit the success of such operations in the future, by according
them widespread publicity.

In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor
their privacy and because our investigations have not been
completed. Part II, like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our
focus is on the similarities of the complaints being received --
similarities which Federal and State legislators, the courts, the
FBI, local law enforcement agencies, the medical and psychiatric
professions, and organizations such as the ACLU and Amnesty
International have so far chosen to ignore.

We frankly find it curious that more attention and creditability
is being accorded purported victims of UFO experiences and
spectral visitations, than to persons who complain of systematic
harassment and experimentation by the U.S. Government, involving
technologies which the U.S. Government is only now grudgingly
admitting to possess. These complaints require investigation. In
due course (and provided financial support is obtained), we hope
to be able to acquire the technology and supportive medical
expertise to substantiate the claims being made. We also hope to
alter the institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence can be
trusted. History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise.

PART 1 - THE PROBLEM SURFACES

[Reprinted form the June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol.
IV, No. 3), published by The Association of National Security
Alumni, Washington, D.C.]

The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline
University's "Public Administration" report on the resolution of
MKULTRA cases in 1988. Although the shocking details of medical
ethics abuses by the U.S. and Canadian governments were amply
detailed, Washington and Ottawa -- citing national security and
government privilege -- stalled for so long that cases never came
to trial. the surviving victims settled for a pittance in an 
out-of-court settlement.

Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable,
the door was left open for possible resumption of similar 
"mind-control" activities.

In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some
half-dozen people had contacted us with appeals for assistance 
in ending what they believe to be electronic harassment and 
mind-control experimentation, possibly involving the CIA. We 
decided to take a closer look at the situation.

We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals
throughout the United States who appear to be targets of
harassment and mind-control experimentation involving
directed-energy technologies. [By mid-November 1992, the number
had increased to 25.]

Typically, persons who complain of being "zapped by radio waves"
and of "hearing voices" are stigmatized as psychotic, delusional
or schizophrenic. Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the
treatment accorded UFO and psychic phenomena "freaks," we
approach this subject with a high degree of caution. Based on our
preliminary investigation, including interviews with the affected
individuals, we conclude that the matter is serious and should be
pursued further.

The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal

Our first step was to determine what, if any technology exists
which might be used for electronic harassment. The information
was found in a "white paper" published in 1991 by the U.S. Global
Strategy Council -- a Washington-based organization, under the
chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of the CIA, who
maintains very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community.
The "white paper" describes the foreign and domestic uses
foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic radiators, infrasound,
non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators, and high-powered
microwave emitters.

The term, "non-lethal," used to describe this technology is
misleading. the energy emitted from all of these weapons can kill
people when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of
amplified, they can cause extreme forms of physical discomfort
and debilitation.

The Department of the Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as
"non-conventional." They were so identified in an exhibit at a
DA-sponsored symposium on "The Soldier As A System," in Crystal
City, VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave incapacitators were
separately mentioned during the symposium as being particular
interested to the U.S. Marine Corps.

We discussed these "non-conventional" directed-energy weapons
with Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of the exhibit and the Army's
delegate to NATO in matters pertaining to "The Soldier As A
System." Mr. Shisler acknowledged not only that directed-energy
weapons are in the DoD's arsenal, but also that the American
soldier will remain vulnerable to their effects, should they be
employed in the battlefield.

The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of
vulnerability, as well, and urges ongoing research into effective
countermeasures.

Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy
Council's complete project proposal on this subject: (Title:
Nonlethality: Development of a National Policy and Employing
Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era, prepared by Janet
Morris). A number of references in this Proposal to unidentified,
elusive "enemies" of the U.S. Government and the potential
domestic applications of this "non-lethal" technology invite
serious consideration by the public at large.

The Council's address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20006, (202) 466-6029.

BIOEFFECTS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION

Research into biological and psychological effects of exposure to
microwave radiation is voluminous. The U.S. public has been led
to believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this research.
The fact is, the CIA and DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly
pursued precisely the same research since commencement of Project
Pandora in the 1950's. The current primary users of this research
appear to be the CIA, DoD, the National Security Agency (NSA) and
the Department of Energy (DoE).

The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has
participated in this research since Project Pandora. In 1973,
WRAIR discovered that externally-induced auditory input could be
achieved by means of pulsed microwave audiograms, or analogs of
spoken words' sounds. The effect on the receiving end is the
(schizophrenic) sensation of "hearing voices" which are no part
of the recipients' own thought processes.

The experiment prompted the following comment in "The Body
Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life," by Robert
O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow & Company, NY,
1985): "Such a device has obvious applications in covert
operations designed to drive a target crazy with 'voices' or
deliver undetected instructions to a programmed assassin."

This research has continued, and the results are published in
various publicly available scientific and technical journals.
Interested readers might consult, for example: Lin, James C.,
Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems (Plenum
Press, NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department of
Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a
number of books and articles on this subject. [He has more
recently informed us that he had designed the experiment referred
above in Dr. Becker's book.] 

WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of
exposure to high power microwave radiation. WRAIR presented a
paper on this subject to a DoD-sponsored symposium on "MW
[microwave] Weapons" at the Naval Postgraduate School in
Monterey, CA, in mid-1989.

A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting
with auditory effects of pulsed microwave audiograms. Also,
recent statements by an Army psychiatrist assigned to the Walter
Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) suggest that WRAIR may be
experimenting upon select psychiatric inpatients with microwaves.
This, too, is a matter to us.

CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT

The Government's past record of abuses in the area of civil
rights is well documented. Within the past 30 years alone, we
have witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
COINTELPRO.

Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive
Orders and implementing regulations were published which
prohibited military and CIA domestic covert intelligence
operations. Experiments on involuntary human subjects, and the
surveillance of/collection of personal information on U.S.
citizens, except under strictly regulated conditions were also
prohibited.

Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with
these (quasi-) legal prohibitions. We have evidence that this is
not being done. Moreover, where there are laws and, in this case,
no laws enacted, there are loopholes, as well as individual and
institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the existence of
loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent
examples. Loopholes are also found in government resort to
"black" intelligence and weapons programs, in the use of
contractors, and in the absence of clear definitions of such
terms as "national security" and "national security risk."

Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit U.S.
Intelligence activities do not extend to non-intelligence
government agencies or to their contractors. If fact, Executive
Order 12333 specifies that government contractors do not need to
know that their services support U.S. Intelligence objectives.

In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on
Oversight of Government Management addresses the problem of
tracking funds granted to government-contracted research and
development (R&D) centers. The report notes that the problem is
compounded by DoD's penchant for creating hard-to-monitor "shell"
contractors as disbursement centers for funding programs.

Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly
accountable to Congress. Being beyond Congressional oversight,
they have the license to operate as Government surrogates in
intelligence operations about which, "officially" they know
nothing.

In this context, a publication disseminated at DA's "The Soldier
As A System" symposium noted that the Army's Research and
Technology Program sponsors 42 laboratories and R&D centers,
employing approximately 10,000 scientists and engineers. The
annual budget of $1.3 billion is only a small part of overall DoD
research spending.

Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of
"non-lethal" weapons, is not governed by laws restricting the
activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may be
presumed that these agencies contribute to and benefit from such
research.

PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

1. The technology exists for the types of harassment and    
   experimentation reported to us.

2. About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of
   continuing experiments with effects which 
   directed-energy weapons are designed to produce.

3. U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects 
   of exposure to microwave radiation is extensive and
   continuing.

4. The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged 
   in mind-control experimentation; and various agencies of
   the Government have a record of circumventing legal
   restrictions upon their activities.

5. Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look   
   closely into "black" intelligence and weapons 
   procurement programs.

6. A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest 
   in testing directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens
   under non-clinical/non-controlled circumstances -- DoD,
   to test ranges and degrees of "non-lethality"; DoE, to
   explore "safety" limits; CIA, to test "mind-control"
   capabilities, and NSA, for technological refinement.

PART II -- OVERT AND COVERT HARASSMENT

Since publication of the preceding article less than four months
ago, the association of National Security Alumni/Electronic
Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13 individuals
who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which
coincide with the known effects of exposure to microwaves,
electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.

The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater
detail in future Project reports. Suffice it to say, at this
point, that the physical and psychological symptoms being
reported to us are consistent with the effects which
directed-energy weapons are designed to produce. Indeed, the
numerous afflictions (or "inflictions") being reported appear to
parallel standard torture "sequelae,"(1) (aftereffects).

OVERT HARASSMENT

Overt Harassment -- which obviously is meant to be observed --
may be intended to "precondition" individuals for eventual
long-term electronic harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained
overt harassment are not likely to cope with the sudden onset of
electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. This phased
pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being
investigated. The fact that the overt harassment continues in
these cases even after the electronic targeting commences suggest
that the objective is to maintain long-term extremes of stress.

Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are
surfacing in cases which (so far) have not involved discernible
forms of electronic harassment. These are cases involving
so-called "whistleblowers" who, because of their inside knowledge
of certain potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats
of embarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated
employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is
beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who
try to assist electronic "harassees." Retaliation suggest loss
of control. Under these circumstances, we are not entirely
confident that "whistleblowers" will continue to be exempted from
this type of harassment in the long term.

The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their
circumstances as involving most, if not all, of the following
overt forms of harassment:

*  Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of
   harassment and vandalism by formerly friendly neighbors.

*  Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the
   targeted individual obtains new, unlisted telephone
   numbers.

*  Mail interception, theft and tampering.

*  Noise campaigns.

While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered
in this context, other tactics are employed. Blaring horns,
whistles, sirens, garbage disposal (run concurrently in apartment
settings, for excessively prolonged periods of time), and
amplified transmissions of recorded "general racket" have been
used on a recurrent basis under circumstances intended to
persuade the individual that he or she is under surveillance.

In all of these cases, the individuals' neighbors apparently
pretend to be oblivious and/or indifferent to these sudden,
continuous explosions of noise.

Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in
apartment buildings. One individual reported that, during a peak
period of harassment, the neighbor across the hall began entering
and leaving his apartment every 10 minutes, slamming his door
loudly on each occasion. This was a daily occurrence,
encompassing periods of several hours, over a period of several
months. It is apparently served to trigger a door-slamming "chain
reaction" on the part of neighbors both on that floor and on the
floors immediately above and below. When our contact politely
asked her immediate neighbor to close her door more quietly, he
slammed the door in her face. Prior to commencement of this
harassment, the neighbor had apparently been quite friendly and
courteous.

In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix
Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD contractor engaged in the
"super-secret" research and development of some type of
electronic equipment.

Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in
their ventilation systems during the preliminary stages of their
harassment. One individual complained of being recurrently
awakened in the middle of the night by the sound of wires being
fed into his (independent) ventilation system. On checking
further, he found that a tubular construction had been built into
his vent system which appears to lead to the apartment upstairs.
His upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice.

A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and
downstairs apartments appear to follow them from room to room,
tapping on the floor or engaging in other activities which appear
intended to advertise an ongoing surveillance.

The Justice Department employee mentioned above went as far as to
offer an unsolicited apology to her downstairs neighbor for an
all-night "pacing about" in her bedroom (in the event he had
happened to notice it). She claimed to be an insomniac. The
pacing-about continued during her recent 36-hour absence from the
area. When her contact politely alerted her to the fact that her
apartment had apparently been entered during her absence, she
told him, in effect, to mind his own business and then
immediately complained to the building manager that he was
stalking her.

She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she
had assiduously "courted" this individual for several months,
without success; and that she had been stealing his newspapers on
a regular basis. (On one occasion, she handed him a week's
accumulation of those papers, claiming that they had been left
outside the door of another apartment. Her reason for collecting
and saving the newspapers which had not been delivered to her
directly is unknown.)

*  Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers;
   and comments by strangers which appear intended to evoke
   "paranoid" reactions.

In this context, we note that several individuals have reported
confrontations with "homeless" people who, on closer examination,
were found to be fastidiously clean, though garbed in offbeat
fashion (wigs included). The same "eccentric" confronted two of
the individuals in contact with us, at separate distant
locations. He is reported as having feigned mental illness on
both occasions, and as having apparently enjoyed creating a
public scene.

*  Entries into the individual's residence, during
   late-night hours while he/she is sleeping, and/or during 
   the day when the individual is elsewhere.

In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their
visits, such as relocating objects, or by committing petty and
not-so-petty acts of vandalism. In two cases, the burglar's
"calling card" was to slaughter caged pets, leaving the mangled
carcasses inside their locked cages.

In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence
and left a packet of crack cocaine behind as a "calling card."
Our contact in this case -- an individual who has no criminal
record and no history of experimentation with drugs -- is also
being harassed (stalked) by a police officer of her community.
One of his recent acts was to "frame" her with a drug possession
charge. After pulling her off the road (a frequent pastime) and
subjecting her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he
conveniently managed to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight
feet away, in front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet
with his fingers and then charged her with Possession. Our
contact found the packet of crack cocaine in her apartment
shortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling
her case that the police officer had smudged his only piece of
evidence with his own fingerprints. It would appear that someone
is interested in correcting that police officer's oversight.

In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount
of money has been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment,
within hours after she had withdrawn the money from her bank.
There was no obvious signs of entry into her apartment. The
police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce
evidence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case is an
anomaly. Money is usually not stolen. Documents appear to be the
preferred objects of theft, when theft occur.)

In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with
"exploding" bulbs, many of which were 'Made in Hungary.'  The
lightbulbs are now in our possession.

*  Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive
   nature.

In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding
accompanied the sudden onset of sever gastrointestinal
disturbances. One of these individuals abruptly terminated the
deteriorative process simply by changing the locks on her door.

*  Sleep disruption/deprivation

This is achieved by means of overt and electronic harassment.
Sleep deprivation, as a tactic, invariably surfaces when the
targeted individual begins exhibiting a strong emotional and
irrational response to the other forms of harassment.

*  Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles

Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment
campaigns -- slashed tires, smashed windows, oil drainage, oil
contamination, destruction of electronic components and batteries
(frequently involving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages,
often within range of weapons research facilities and/or other
microwave emitters); and suddenly failed brakes and clutches
(possible involving anti-traction polymers, which are also in
DoD's "non-lethal" weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have
also been reported.

Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated
immediately after having the oil changed by reputable mechanics.
In one of these cases, the oil viscosified (thickened) while the
individual was driving through a remote rural area. Her car
ground to a halt. Getting the "gunk" cleaned out of her engine
proved to be an expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents are
also lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council as serving
"non-lethal" strategic purposes -- a topic discussed in Part I of
this publication. Had this woman been assaulted while awaiting
help in the said isolated area, the "non-lethal" attributes of
viscosification agents might have required redefinition.)

Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring
basis have abandoned driving all together -- an objective
apparently sought by their tormentors as a means of increasing
their isolation.

*  Staged accidents.

The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types
of experiences. One individual, for example, was tailgated at a
high rate of speed by two vehicles, while concurrently being
threatened with a gun by one of the vehicles' occupants. Two
others narrowly avoided what happened to be deliberately
attempted collisions by drivers who quickly sped away from the
scene. One avoided three attempts in four days at being run off
the road. One survived by being run off the road in two incidents
within a one-week period, which resulted in "totaling" of her two
vehicles. Another narrowly avoided being crushed into an
expressway retaining wall, on four occasions, by an off-duty
metro bus, as well as, within the same time frame, being "fried"
by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances which
subsequently repaired themselves. It should be noted that, in
some of these cases, "accidental" deaths do occur.  One
individual in contact with us reported that his mother drove off
a cliff to her death, during a period when he was researching
evidence that a still-respected, high level State Department
official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet Government
during World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her car
had undergone routine maintenance. She was returning from a
dental appointment when the accident occurred. Witnesses state
that it appeared that she had suddenly stepped on the accelerator
before running off the road. The accident served to terminate
this person's research project.

We also look into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO,
who was killed when the brakes on her tractor failed. We are
informed that she had been collecting affidavits from persons who
believe they are the targets of government harassment and
experimentation when her "accident" occurred. We are also
informed that these affidavits have disappeared.

Suicides might also qualify as "staged accidents," particularly
where "plausibly deniable" government involvement has been
surfaced. We are currently looking into the recent suicide of a
man in Trappe, PA, who, as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and
CIA to intervene in his case. We have copies of that early
correspondence. The man, a former U.S. Army radar technician, had
a highly technical and -- given date of his correspondence --
"precocious" grasp of the experimental objectives apparently
being sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence
that he had wanted to believe that the Soviets were conducting
these experiments. The FBI and CIA, of course, did not intervene.
We are informed that members of his family have also been targets
of this experimentation.

*  Isolation of the individual from members of his/her
   family -- virtually assured when highly focused forms of
   electronic harassment commence.

The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children
in the family become targets for apparent purposes of
intimidation. This situation has been reported in eight of our
cases, to date.

One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing
electronic harassment focusing on her children) killed one child
in an effort to protect her from further pain.(2) It appears
that lasers were being used in this individual's case. The
targeting intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to
report the harassment, which she believed to be U.S.
Government-sponsored. It became even more deadly when, in a
further show of defiance, she then called the representative of
the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S. Government's war in the
Middle East as "hypocritical." She is now hospitalized in a
midwestern facility, where, apparently, the experimentation is
now continuing.

(That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate
number of complaints of electronic harassment are beginning to
surface. It is also within range of a U.S. Air Force base which
houses a "super secret" research facility. We are currently
looking into information that spouses and children of persons
employed on that USAF base may be the targets of involuntary
experimentation involving direct-energy weapons technologies.)

Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by
an employee of a local power company that, if she valued the
lives of her children, she would drop her public opposition to
the company's installation of high power lines. Since receiving
that threat, the individual's 11-year-old daughter has been
reduced to extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent
hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which cannot be
diagnosed. It is also apparent to this individual that her
three-year-old son is on the receiving end of externally-induced
auditory input. (DoE figures prominently in this case.)

*  Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by
   termination of the individual's employment, and
   compounded by expenses associated with the harassment.

The majority of those now in contact with the Project --
educated, white-collar professionals -- have lost their jobs.
Termination of employment in many of these cases involved
prefatory harassment by the employer and co-workers, which
coincided with the other overt forms of harassment discussed
above.

The overt harassment tactics are being described as recurrent,
non-sequential and overlapping. As noted above, the overt
harassment continues even after the electronic harassment
commences.

FAILURE OF "ESTABLISHMENT" SUPPORT SYSTEMS

Those individuals who have tried to resolve their respective
situations through resort to "establishment" channels have
invariably encountered the following:

*  Apathy, indifference and/or professed helplessness on the
   part of members of Congress and state legislators.

*  Dismissal and/or attempted discrediting by psychiatrists
   who refuse to include the terms, "government harassment,"
   "mind-control experimentation" and "torture" in their
   vocabulary.

Several individuals, thinking the psychiatrists might help to
alleviate the extreme stress associated with their harassment,
and accorded "treatment" which clearly pointed to corporation
between their psychiatrists and members of the U.S. Intelligence
community. One such psychiatrist, in fact, bragged about being a
member of the U.S. Intelligence "inner circle," informing our
contact that her harassment was a "Pavlovian Experiment,"
intended to "break" her.

*  Lack of interest, courage and/or competency in legal
   circles.

Few of those in contact with us have been able to acquire legal
assistance -- not helped by their straitened financial
circumstances. Most have found that few attorneys are willing to
risk their careers by pursuing cases involving what is believed
to be government-sponsored harassment or experimentation.

A few attorneys reportedly engaged in egregious violations of
codes of professional conduct, in what appear to have been
deliberate efforts at sabotaging our contacts' cases. Subsequent
attempts by two individuals at obtaining legal redress were met
with stonewalling, obstruction, and high-level denials of
wrongdoing.

*  Refusal of the mass media to address this topic, except
   in those cases where suspected experimentees have been
   driven to committing murder or suicide.

Such cases (particularly where an individual has claimed to be a
victim of CIA-directed mind-control involving auditory input) are
treated by the press as "curiosities." An example of this is the
individual who shot a Navy officer outside the Pentagon in 
mid-1991.(3)  He claimed to be a victim of CIA mind control,
involving auditory input. According to the press, "he worried
'about being run over by trains'..." (ref. incident described in
following paragraph). He is now permanently residing in a
psychiatric facility. He, being institutionalized, and others in
the preliminary stages of his predicament are no longer of
interest to the media.

Another recent case which received short-lived press attention(4)
involved a woman diagnosed as having "suffered from periods of
confusion" who climbed over a fence onto a railroad track and
walked into an oncoming train. Because the incident occurred in a
community in which an unusually large number of mind-control
experiments have been reported, we are looking into the
situation. The woman was reportedly "under a physician's care"
because of her "periods of confusion." A family member described
the physician to this investigator as "a psychiatrist." We find
that the alleged "psychiatrist" is a General Practitioner,
otherwise non-accredited, practicing out of his home. We find
also that the suicide may have been witnessed under
peculiarly-timed circumstances by an alleged "homeless" person
who has since disappeared. Needless to say, our interest has been
whetted.

*  Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.

The tendency of local police is to dismiss an individual's
complaints of government harassment as the ravings of a
"fruitcake." In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that
one police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment.
Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality of the
situation, hesitate to intervene in cases involving what they
believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain
police officials did attempt to intervene, based on what they
perceived to be evidence of a systematic harassment/illegal
surveillance campaign. Absent a clear mandate to prosecute
"stalkers" acting under the aegis of U.S. Intelligence, the
police obviously had their hands tied.

*  Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases
   brought to our attention thus far.

FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large
number of requests for assistance from "mentally disturbed
persons" who believe that they are being "zapped by radio waves"
and/or "are hearing voices..." "from Mars, that is."

In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in a angry, defensive and
bizarre fashion when our contact briefly alluded to PROJECT
SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT
SLAMMER is a CIA-funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral
scientist, which explores the "mental make-up" of alleged
security risks, along with their family members and close
associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and
Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)

Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman's approach
in this case was to politely and redundantly explain that the
law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI's intervening in
this individual's case. What she briefly pointed out that the
surveillance activities might fall under the purview of PROJECT
SLAMMER, the spokesman's response was to abruptly and angrily
declaim, "You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! You
don't know if that is a state police surveillance!...or a local
police surveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation!
You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! [etc.,
etc.]!"

It was apparent from that response that the FBI was at least
acknowledging the existence of a surveillance, if in somewhat
emotional fashion. The individual in question subsequently
furnished acquired evidence to the local police, who made it
clear that they are no participants in the surveillance which,
based on the evidence, pointedly suggest that our contact is the
target.

*  Refusal of inability of the ACLU and Amnesty International 
   to intervene.

Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from
persons claiming to be the targets of some type of electronic
harassment. An ACLU spokes-woman characterized the complaints as
appearing to be rational, except in a few cases. The complaints
are not being investigated, she said, because of "limited
resources." We have to wonder, of course, why the ACLU could
recently find resources to defend the rights of prostitutes and
the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases
such as we are now pursuing.

Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that
they could not intervene in her case because their focus is on
the U.S. Government's treatment of prison inmates. While
incarceration does appear to be one sought-for objective in this
harassment/mind control experiments, we would like to think that
protection by such organizations as Amnesty International can be
achieved beforehand.

RELATED COVERT METHODOLOGIES

The persons engaged in this harassment tend to become careless,
possibly the result of arrogance born of an assumption that
nobody can stop them. "Harassees" who have noted this
carelessness have furnished us with the following insights into
the covert side of these harassment activities.

*  Impersonation of military officers.

One individual found that her next-door neighbor had claimed to
be a military intelligence officer, assigned to a space
technology unit in California, on year-long "TDY" (temporary
duty) in the individual's apartment building. It is subsequently
determined that this alleged officer is not in fact a member of
the U.S. Armed Forces; and that he had used this bogus status to
acquire information from a major defense contractor. Our contact
is certain that this person's apartment was used as a base of
harassment operations.

*  Use of concealment devices, and emitters detected to date.

Several individuals and supportive associates report having seen
some of the electronic devices being used in these harassment
campaigns.

One saw electronic equipment concealed inside a false-front
upright piano being moved out of her apartment building. She had
previously noted that all of her surrounding neighbors had
identical upright pianos in their apartments, not one of which
was ever played.

Other suspected participants in the harassment may be concealing
devices in oversized stereo speakers, measuring approximately 5'
in height x 3'x3'. Several of our contacts have noted the
presence of such speakers in adjacent dwellings.

One individual was told by a resident of her building that her
upstairs neighbor has "microwave ovens" in his bedroom and
livingroom, but none in the kitchen.

Another individual, while standing outside, looked in her
neighbor's window to find that her bedroom appeared to be the
target of a gray-colored, elongated box-like device, measuring
approximately 1' in length x 5" in height (side view). A large,
black-framed lens protruded from the end facing her window. The
electrical cord, if any, was not visible from that vantage point.
The equipment was being operated by a stranger in a three-piece
suit, who appeared to be quite startled to find that he was being
observed.

Another was given strong reason to believe that portable emitters
are being concealed in oversized, extremely heavy, sometimes
expandable "briefcases" for use in places of public assembly,
such as meeting halls, auditoriums and restaurants. Smaller
varieties are apparently being used on aircraft.

On a 3-hour flight, our contact noticed that the man sitting next
to her seemed peculiarly intent on keeping the attache case on
his lap propped open with his fingertips, while he gazed
"blankly" into the distance during the entire flight. She
believed that she was being electronically harassed while on a
flight (a common complaint, in most of these cases now being
investigated).

Our contact reports that, when they prepared to land, the man
opened his attache case to hastily check his contents, thus
disclosing the presence of a raised, built-in "concealment
device" covering the entire bottom surface of the attache case.
The low-slung, lift-off cover did not appear to be capable of
concealing a laptop computer. At one point during the flight --
apparently aware that his "reverie" was inviting attention, --
the man devoted approximately ten minutes to scribbling assorted
entries on a sheet of lined paper, which he had placed on top of
the briefcase two hours previously. He devoted roughly ten
minutes to the effort (obviously preferring a pen to a laptop
computer). His attache case remained ajar during this process.(5)

One individual reports that mobile emitters may be installed in
certain oversized, non-attributed medical emergency vehicles,
possibly for the eventual use in civil disturbances. Her
unsuccessful attempts at following the "medical emergency"
vehicle which had surfaced in her case ended with a high-speed
chase.

The phony military intelligence officer, when recently moving out
of our contact's apartment building, was found to possess a
device which resembles an oversized microwave oven, measuring
approximately 4' in width x 2' in height x 2 1/2' in depth. A
subsequent examination of his apartment revealed that he had
tapped numerous additional lines into existing, in-house
telephone and TV cables; and that he had gone to great pains to
conceal a major excavation into one wall abutting the
"harassee's."  Judging from photographs taken immediately after
this person's departure, the wiring suggests that he was hooked
by modem into a computer network, and at least of some of his
electronic equipment was situated in a large walk-in closet,
again abutting the "harassee's."

When the alleged officer moved out, his equipment (except for the
oversized "microwave oven") was packaged in boxes identifying the
contents only as stereo components. During his year-long
residency in this building, no sounds emanated from his apartment
to indicate use of this "stereo" equipment.

*  Use of modified license plates and vehicle look-alikes.

Some individuals have noted that their neighbors' vehicles are
periodically replaced (during peak periods of harassment) by
others which qualify as "rough look-alikes." These tags on the
latter closely resemble those on the homeowners' vehicles, with a
difference being noted in only one digit or one letter. These
modified plates appear to have been acquired through State DMV
channels, thus suggesting government/intelligence agency
involvement.

In one case, where the individual has obtained police assistance,
tracking of one plate surfaced evidence of a drug connection. The
plate rapidly disappeared from the vehicle in question, to be
replaced by another, again bearing a one-letter modification.

*  Use of neighbors' residences as bases of operation and 
   training.

One individual recently saw a team of "technicians" in the house
behind hers -- a consequence of the team's failure to close the
curtains and/or dim the lights when puttering around the kitchen
at 5:00 in the morning. The three men (strangers to this
individual, all stripped down to their T-shirts) behaved as if
they were unaware that they were being watched. Their observer
had long suspected that this house was being used as a base of
electronic harassment operations. The harassment had been going
on throughout the night.

To provoke a response from these men, the individual eventually
commented aloud on their activities. They responded immediately
by turning the lights off and switching to the use of
flashlights. Why they failed to close the curtain is unknown.

This individual is working with the police in a effort at ending
this surveillance and harassment, with mixed results.

                             ***

Another individual, paying a surprise visit to the apartment
upstairs, overheard one of her own telephone conversations being
played on a tape recorder inside that apartment. Lacking both a
legitimate pretext to enter the apartment and the support of the
building's management personnel and/or the police, she was
prevented from pursuing this further. Her upstairs neighbor is
purportedly employed by Stanford University Hospital, in
Stanford, CA.

The target of surveillance and harassment in this case is still
also trying to recover from the effects of exposure to
potentially lethal doses of radiation, administered in the 1970's
by a dangerously "incompetent" dentist. This might explain the
involvement of alleged Stanford University Hospital personnel in
her situation.

The government is on record as having experimented on unwitting
U.S. citizens with radioactive materials during the 1970's (and
earlier).(6) The House Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce based
their investigation into this matter on a 30-year accumulation of
documents maintained by the Department of Energy. Under the
circumstances, it will come as no surprise if it is ultimately
found that DoE has been involved in this woman's surveillance and
harassment.

                             ***

Another individual paid a surprise visit to the apartment
immediately below hers, in the attempt to identify the source of
tremendous racket in her ventilation system. Standing outside the
door, she could hear an individual moving around, a short
distance from the door. She also heard the sound of rustling
paper and the steady, sonar-like "pinging" of some type of
electronic device. In response to her repeated knockings on the
door, the person inside simply stopped moving about. The sound of
rustling paper (perhaps a printout of some type) and the steady
"...pin-ng!...pin-ng!" sound continued. The occupant of this
apartment resumed moving about only after it was (incorrectly)
believed that our contact had departed the area. Typically, this
situation could not be pursued further.

                             ***

All of those who live in apartment buildings report unusual
patterns of occupancy in the apartments surrounding their own;
i.e., upstairs, downstairs and on all sides. They have become
quite convinced -- if only because of the highly focused nature
of the systems being experienced -- that these surrounding
apartments are being used as bases of operation. Perhaps this
encirclement facilities studies of holographic human telemetries;
or perhaps it is intended to increase the prospect of brain
entrainment by electronic means ("entrainment" being one
published objective sought in mind control experiments).(7)

In examining this situation more closely, a number of individuals
have found that surrounding apartments are either permanently
vacant, for unknown reasons, or that they have been "sub-let" by
the original occupants to persons who are purportedly unknown to
the buildings' management personnel. In one case, the surrounding
renters all list two residences in the local telephone book. No
one lives in the apartment building in question, though the
address is identified as one of the renters' places of residence.
One individual suspects that the original occupants of apartments
surrounding hers have been simply relocated to other apartments
in the same (large) building. Another suspects that an adjacent
apartment, which has been permanently rented to the U.S.
Government for use by "visitors" is also being used as a base of
operations.

One individual found that an immediate neighbor's housemate has
the same (unusual) name of a university professor who has engaged
in extensive research on behalf of the government, studying the
bioeffects of exposure to microwave radiation.

*  Use of informants/agents provocateurs, frequently members
   of the opposite sex.

As noted in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
Interior and Insular Affair's draft report, Alyeska Pipeline
Service Company Covert Operation (July 1992), the Wackenhut
Corporation's Special Investigations Division adopted this tactic
when pursuing Alyeska's critics.

A number of individuals in touch with us report a range of
experiences with new "friends" who -- apparently posing as
confidants -- used acquired personalia to abruptly end these
"friendships" under deliberately degrading and humiliating
circumstances. When taken in the context of ongoing surveillance
and harassment, these exercises appear intended to heighten
emotional trauma, perhaps to provoke an uncontrolled response
and/or to enforce isolation.

*  Misuse of covert intelligence personnel (possible former
   case officers).

One individual while under contract to the U.S. Government,
properly reported what he believed to be an approach by a hostile
intelligence service. Within a few weeks, alleged U.S.
Intelligence officers contacted this individual. In addition to
questioning him about his background, these alleged intelligence
officers asked that he keep in constant contact with them,
particularly when planning to travel.

It soon became apparent that the alleged intelligence officers
were intent only on forcing this individual to report to them as
directed, and to account for his activities. He was not asked to
assist the U.S. Government in any form of intelligence operation;
he was not asked to execute any form of secrecy affirmation
statement acknowledging the classified nature of these meetings;
nor was he told why these meetings -- involving a total of seven
alleged case officers -- were necessary.

When he began to balk at a continuation of this process, one of
his "handlers" conveyed a threat, suggesting that his continued
compliance might be "enforced." Finally, when this individual
adamantly refused to corporate further, massive overt harassment
commenced and is currently ongoing.

The operation (clearly intended to bully this individual into
submissive compliance for purposes which are still unknown)
involved crude tactics formerly prized by the KGB.

Whether or not legitimate U.S. Intelligence case officers were
involved in this activity remains to be determined. Some private
firms retain former U.S. Intelligence case officers for
contracting out as "security specialist." The founder and CEO of
one such firm (Gerald P. Burke, The Parvus Company, Silver
Spring, MD) has informed us that the activities of contract case
officers are neither monitored nor subjected to formal restraint.

*  Use of psychotropic drugs by cooperative physicians.

Shortly after resigning from the CIA, one of our contacts
underwent a range of experiences which suggested that she had
been massively drugged. One of the alleged perpetrators, whom we
have met, alternately claims to be employed by NASA and/or by a
firm in Miami, handling, "microwave equipment." NASA has no
record of this person under the name furnished.

The "experimentee" ultimately sought the assistance of a
psychiatrist, whom her parents had located as a referral. The
psychiatrist treated her reported "flashbacks" by immediately
placing her on a regimen of Stelazine, which quickly aggravated
her condition. He also made comments to this individual which
suggested that he had a foreknowledge of her situation, and that
he was cooperating with U.S. Intelligence. On one occasion the
psychiatrist intimated that our contact might be employable as an
assassin; and he repeatedly urged her to move to Great Britain
where, he said, she would be put in touch with an unidentified
Member of Parliament.

Interestingly, he had a tremendous computer system in his office
suite, which he explained as being connected by modem into a
national level system which, in turn, connected to private
residences. When showing her this equipment, the psychiatrist
informed our contact that she had been "CAT scanned," pointing
out that she was the subject of a vast series of "A's" and "B's"
being printed out by one of the many terminals at his disposal.

Our contact also found out that this psychiatrist kept a military
uniform in his closet which bore the rank and insignia of a
three-star general.

The individual ultimately sought psychiatric support elsewhere.
Her new psychiatrist, formerly employed by DoD, immediately put
her on a regimen of Haladol Decanoate, Klonopin and Benzatropine.
The combined effect of these drugs was loss of memory and a state
of mind which, under other circumstances, might be diagnosed as
Depersonalization or Dissociative Disorder. All three drugs
proved to be highly addictive. Our contact, since severing
contact which this psychiatrist as well, has finally successfully
overcome the addiction.

                             ***

Another individual -- the one whose psychiatrist had informed her
of her role in a "Pavlovian Experiment" -- was subjected to
attempted drugging by Trazodone, one of the strongest sedatives
on the market. The psychiatrist in question kept no record of the
individual's outpatient visits, nor of her Trazodone
prescriptions. Being unaware that the individual was not
adhering to his regimen, the psychiatrist urged her rapidly to
increase her dosage, renewing her 30-day prescription after a
period of only 11 days.

Though aware of her heart condition, he failed to monitor her
condition, dismissing her complaints of (electronically-induced)
pains in her heart as inconsequential. Trazodone is known to
aggravate heart conditions. Perhaps the intent was to have this
individual succumb to a "heart attack" as the result of
"imagined" government harassment. Neither the appropriate
psychiatric society nor the FBI would touch this case.

                              ***

Another individual (a clear target of retaliation) sought medical
assistance to counter sudden massive headaches and recurrent
attacks of vomiting -- effects which can be produced by
infrasound. The physician to whom she was referred (an alleged
specialist in Internal Medicine) placed her on a combination of
Compazine and Xanax, prescribing dosages which the Physicians'
Desk Reference warns against.

Compazine, in addition to being an anti-emetic, is used in the
treatment of psychotic disorders. It can also cause dyskinesia,
an irreversible syndrome involving loss of motor control. Xanax
is known to induce vomiting. Both drugs can lead to dependance
and a worsening of the patient's condition. The effects of all
such drugs, in fact, can be mutated in high-energy fields, thus
increasing the likelihood of adverse reactions.

We have recently found that this prescribing "physician" is not
licensed to practice medicine in the State of which she has been
practicing since at least 1989.

Our contact, being concerned about the long-term effects of Xanax
and Compazine, consulted another physician in the same office.
The physician immediately prescribed Prozac, failing to
concurrently recommend that her patient discontinue the Xanax and
Compazine prescriptions. When our contact refused to take any
psychotropic drugs, the doctor became upset and asked, "Don't you
want to get well?"

This second physician is a licensed practitioner in Internal
Medicine, with no background in Psychiatry. We also found that
she apparently refers her patients to yet a third physician in
the office who claims to be a psychiatrist. She, too, is licensed
to practice Internal Medicine, only. Her receptionist described
this third physician as having a psychiatric "sub-specialty," ...
"as an internist."  The receptionist also informed us that this
internist "is treating a number of psychiatric patients."

On pursuing this further, we find that these physicians are in a
small "medicine group" which is not listed by specialty in
standard regional telephone directories. The group bears the same
name as one of the CIA's most infamous recruited physicians
(perhaps best described as "the Mengele of MKULTRA").

The doctor's offices are located in a bank building, which, we
have found, is a favored hiding place for security-oriented
business and government agencies. Two computer firms, co-located
with an attorney who represents "Island Resort Development,
Ltd.," are situated immediately beneath the doctors' offices. The
prospect of finding island resort developments within 500 miles
of this attorney's office is limited.

Our contact, being apprised of these findings, is seeking medical
help elsewhere.

                             ***

In two of our cases, urologist took it upon themselves to play
the role of "psychiatrist"; i.e., they rendered psychiatric
diagnoses and prescribed psychotropic drugs. One of these
urologist, employed by The Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN,
prescribed Haldol, informing our contact that he perceived her to
be "psychotic." His efforts at getting a Clinic psychiatrist to
confirm this diagnosis were unsuccessful. The psychiatrist,
apparently a rare individual who subscribes to codes of medical
ethics, found nothing wrong with this woman, even given the
nature of her complaints. The urologist's response to this was to
issue his own Haldol prescription. Sensing that something was
amiss, the woman refused to have the prescription filled.

                               ***

Yet another individual ended up in the hands of a psychiatrist
who, as a purported means of ending the stress associated with
her harassment, offered to put her under hypnosis. She described
the hypnotic state as "equivalent to floating" and (based on her
overall experiences with this physician) has not ruled out the
possibility that drugs may have been surreptitiously
administered. The psychiatrist claimed to be interested in
psychic phenomena and demonstrated an apparently remarkable
ability to read the individual's mind.

While in her "hypnotic state, the individual felt like a sharp,
painful pressure inside her nose, as if something were being
shoved up her nostrils to the sinus cavities. She awoke to find
blood pouring from her nostrils. The psychiatrist casually
dismissed this as owing to a probable cold.

Shortly after the experience, the individual began to hear loud
tones in her head, followed in due coarse by auditory input.
Brain scans have failed to yield evidence of an implant device.
(We have recommended that she undergo a scan by means of a
suitably adapted non-linear junction detector, as a preliminary.)
Suffice to say, this individual has severed contact with the
psychiatrist and is continuing to cope with the ongoing overt
electronic harassment by other non-medical means.

*  Use of medical implant devices.

The situation just described is not our first encounter with the
apparent use of medical implant devices in these harassment/mind-
control cases. Another of our contacts began receiving auditory
input roughly 15 years after she had a 4 mm. cochlear implants
placed in her ears. The "voices" claimed to be affiliated with
the CIA and, among other things, expressed intentions of running
this woman as an agent in denied areas by "piggybacking" their
audio transmissions onto standard FM frequencies to avoid
detection.

We have been unable to locate the surgeon who implanted these
devices, though we do have a copy of his operative reports. A
recent CAT scan of this individual failed to disclose the
presence of the cochlear implants.

Several years ago, the individual (now a psychologist) applied
for a position with the CIA. She was interviewed by four Langley-
based, purported psychologists, who allegedly informed her that
her job would involve the assessments of certain criminals for
purposes of weighing their purposes for loyalty to this agency.

During these interviews, she was told to read several books by
such persons as Philip Agee, Stansfield Turner and Ralph McGehee,
all of whom were unknown to her. The alleged psychologist claimed
that these authors had described the CIA "as it really is." Our
contact was not asked to execute a security affirmation statement
acknowledging the classified nature of these proceedings. 

The unconventional manner of this interview process suggested
that this individual was being toyed with, for reason which
remain to be determined. She did not get the job and in fact more
recently lost her job with a state penitentiary. She was fired on
the recommendation of the prison's psychiatrist, because of her
insistence that she is receiving auditory input from the CIA
personnel who persist in feeding her classified information.

Interestingly, though this individual was deemed unfit to
function as a psychologist in the penitentiary system, the State
rehired her, assigning her to a mental health facility where,
apparently, she is to develop a behavioral modification program
for retarded adults with a diagnosed mental illness.

This individual claimed to be receiving and responding to
externally-induced auditory "advice" while working with prison
inmates. It may be presumed that the process will continue. Under
the circumstances, we have to wonder if this case qualifies as a
benchmark in mind-control experimentation; i.e., employment of a
mind-controlled psychologist to run the equivalent of
mind-control experiments on mentally-ill retarded adults. We will
continue to monitor this situation.

                             ***

The individual we previously identified as having challenged a
local power company also appears to have ben "tagged" by some
type of implant device. During a recent symposium, she was
approached by a man whose business card identifies him as
"Program Manager, Electromagnetic Radiation Division," DoE. His
approach was suitably sympathetic. Our contact ultimately
accepted this man's invitation to continue discussing their
common ranges of interest in his hotel room. During this meeting,
she accepted the offer of a drink, blacked out after consuming
it, and woke up four hours later, still in this man's hotel room,
to find that the back of her ear had been punctured and was
bleeding. There was no evidence of sexual assault. The man glibly
evaded this woman's request for an explanation. She has since
found two adjacent puncture marks behind her ear, which are not
healing properly, and between which she can feel the presence of
a "wire" measuring approximately 1/3" in length. We are pursuing
this further.

The said DoE Project Manager has more recently initiated contact
with yet another activist in touch with this Association. His
call was unsolicited. He apparently wanted to know to know if
this woman would be attending an upcoming conference. We have
warned the individual to avoid any form of private meeting with
the said Project Manager.

                            ***

To date, we are aware of three cases involving clandestine
behavior on the part of alleged DoE employees. The CIA figures
prominently (if peculiarly) in the majority of the other cases.
Two of those have been discussed above.

I another, also involving auditory input, the individual is
certain that the current Director of Central Intelligence (DCI)
participated in the "voice transmission" process on at least one
occasion. She claims to have recognized his voice. When she
commented aloud on the DCI's perceived involvement in this
experimentation, the "voice" responded with stuttered and
stammered denials. We are told that this particular "voice" has
not been heard from since.

                            ***

In yet another case involving auditory input, the individual has
allegedly been informed by her "voices" that the technologies
being used against her were stolen from the CIA by a maverick
employee, whose group is not targeting her from a distance of
2,000 miles. She reported this to the DCI's office and was
allegedly informed by the Deputy DCI that she will be awarded
millions of dollars if she can produce the equipment and any of
the personnel involved in her harassment.

One usually-candid CIA spokesman also allegedly informed this
individual that, "while the CIA does not deny having this
equipment," they "do not use it in this country." Perhaps this
explains why a number of our contacts have also been
electronically harassed while traveling overseas.

This woman has also been repeatedly assured by CIA DDS (security)
personnel of the Agency's sincere concern for her welfare. During
a recent telephone conversation with that Office, we confirmed
that she is indeed known to the CIA. Based on this, we asked that
the Agency "put its money where its mouth is," so to speak, by
conducting a long-term electronic sweep of this individual's
premises. That was two months ago. No sweep has been conducted,
though CIA spokesmen continue to "sympathize" with her
predicament.

                              ***

Another individual, a target of harassment and experimentation
since 1952 (apparently singled out because of his student
activism while at Penn State University) began hearing "voices"
after having most of his teeth capped. He has been more recently
been informed by his "handlers" that implanted devices are no
longer used for purposes of inducing auditory input. No
explanation was offered.  He was quite visibly surprised when
informed by this investigator that auditory input can be achieved
solely by means of pulsed microwave audiograms (discussed in Part
I of this report).

The individual's "handlers" allegedly have also stated that their
experiments on U.S. citizens are in pursuit of a variety of
objectives; viz.,

(1)  develop an effective means for creating a perfect,
     "robotized" soldier;

(2)  alter individual sexual performances, such as by
     turning  heterosexuals into homosexuals (they allegedly 
     claim to be having "difficulties" reversing the process);
     
     and

(3)  enhance and destroy levels of academic achievement, at
     will, such as by degrading the performance of otherwise
     brilliant students, and by drastically improving the
     performance of poor students.

Given the technology at the government's disposal and a
predisposition of the part of certain governmental agencies to
"play God" in experimental fashion with citizens' lives, these
purported projects do not come across as being totally
far-fetched.

                            ***

Another case involves a woman whose experiences suggest that she,
too, is an MKULTRA experimentee being kept on the books, so to
speak. The woman, apparently a "pet" experimentee, found herself
being introduced to a wide array of prominent individuals whose
connections with the CIA she believed to be quite apparent. One
of those she states, was Robert Jay Lifton, a well-known author
and expert on brainwashing, whose books include "The Nazi
Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide" (Basic
Books, 1986).

Her experiences included a voluntary ("referral") admission to
Hollywood Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in 1973,
during an era when MKULTRA experiments at the Alan Memorial
Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, were only
beginning to capture the attention of the U.S. Senate.(8)

More recently, in 1990, she was transported to New York
University's Cameron Medical Center, in Westchester, NY (under
circumstance which qualify as an abduction), where she was
forcibly wrestled to the ground by approximately six Center
staffers and forcibly confined for a period of approximately
three weeks. She was neither psychiatrically counseled nor
formally tested while in that facility. The psychiatrists
assigned to her case appeared more intent on forcing her to take
a combination of neuroleptic drugs, to include Haldol, Navane,
and Cogentin. (Haldol and Navane can cause tardive dyskinesia.)
She resisted those attempts.

A court ultimately ordered this woman released from the Center,
stipulating that she was not to be administered drugs. On
subsequently acquiring her medical records, under conditions
which prevented censoring or doctoring those records, she found
that her psychiatrists had planned to inject her with drugs (in
defiance of the court order) on the day of her release. As luck
would have it, she was released a day early.

The woman states that she has met Budd Hopkins, of the Intruders
Foundation, and that she had a long-term, confiding relationship
with John E. Mack, Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical
School, and the founding Director of the Center for Psychological
Studies in the Nuclear Age (previously named, Research Program
for the Study of Human Continuity; and, still previously, rumored
to have cooperated with the CIA in studies of "human ecology").

At one point in their relationship, Professor Mack apparently
accompanied this woman to a "support group" meeting of UFO
abductees, who, she observed bemusedly, "spent their time
comparing [extraterrestrially] implanted devices." Professor
Mack is on record as promoting the perception that UFO abductions
are legitimate.(9)

We frankly doubt that extraterrestrials who have a means to
commute intergalactically would stoop to implanting comparatively
devices in human beings. However, should it be proved that the
psychiatrist, surgeon and DoE Project Manager above are
extraterrestrials posing as humans, we will be happy to weigh
that information. If it is similarly established to the vehicular
"abduction" of the woman discussed above was the work of an
extraterrestrial named Kaplan, who was posing as a human with
Cornell Medical Center connections, we will be happy to ponder
that as well.

In the meantime, it would seem reasonable that the government
would want the public to believe that extraterrestrial
visitations are on the upswing. Mind-altering drugs,
externally-induced auditory input, holographic projections (also
a DoD capability),(10) appropriately focused directed-energy
targeting, device implantations, special effects and abductions
are all within this government's capabilities and can be used for
purposes of creating illusions of UFO experiences. Persons not
cognizant of this might be more inclined to fall for the UFO
mythologies now being officially "legitimized."

                             ***

Other cases, possibly involving U.S. Navy Intelligence, NSA, the
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and, peripherally, members of the
former Soviet Bloc intelligence services will be discussed in
further reports.

HARASSMENT OBJECTIVES

In his book, Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, Dr.
Harvey Weinstein quotes the following passage from a book
entitled, A battle for the Mind: A Physiology in Conversion and
Brainwashing, by William Sergeant (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT,
1957): 

"By increasing the prolong stress in various ways, or inducing
physical debilitation, a more thorough alteration of the person's
thinking process may be achieved. ...If the stress or physical
debilitation, or both, are carried one stage further, it may
happen that patterns of thought and behavior, especially those of
recent acquisition, become disrupted. New patterns can then be
substituted, or suppressed patterns allowed to reassert
themselves; or the subject might begin to think or act in ways
precisely contradict his former ones.

"'...If a complete sudden collapse can be produced by prolonging
or intensifying emotional stress, the cortical slate may be wiped
clean temporarily of its more recently implanted patterns of
behavior, perhaps allowing others to be substituted more
easily.'"

Dr. Weinstein then comments: "The parallel with [Dr. Ewen]
Cameron's theory of differential amnesia is striking, and the
relationship to brainwashing is abundantly clear."(11)  Dr.
Cameron, employed by McGill University's Allan Memorial Institute
in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, between 1943 and 1964, conducted
brainwashing experiments upon select, non-volunteer psychiatric
patients on behalf of the CIA. Dr. Weinstein's father was one of
Cameron's victims.

Sergeant's theorems and Cameron's associated experimental
findings appear to be the driving force behind the harassment and
experimentation now being reported to this Association. All of
these individuals are being subjected to a series of overlapping
circumstances which apparently are meant to induce and sustain
long-term extremes of stress. All of these individuals have been
effectively isolated. Unethical psychiatrists and physicians are
involved in the majority of these cases. Mind-altering
prescription drugs are being used for clearly non-therapeutic
purposes. Evidence of LSD use is also beginning to surface (one
of Cameron's favored mind-altering substances). And "psychic
driving" techniques -- Cameron's pet brainwashing method -- are
involved in all these cases, to a much greater and more
potentially effective degree where auditory input is involved.

The long-term objectives of these harassment and experimentation
campaigns appear to be quite fundamental; viz.,

(1)  induce a sense of perverted "loyalty" toward the very
     agencies engaged in the individual's harassment, to
     confuse his or her priorities where the possibility of
     obtaining legal redress might be concerned;

(2)  redirect the targeted individual's feelings of
     hopelessness, anger and frustration toward racial and
     ethnic groups, and toward select, prominent political
     figures, to include the President of the United States;

     and

(3)  force the individual to commit an act of violence,
     whether suicide or murder, under conditions which he
     can be plausibly denied by the government.

An operation's ultimate success apparently hangs on this latter
objective. We have successfully obstructed this process in a
number of cases now being investigated.

THE "STALKER" PHENOMENON

In recent weeks, considerable publicity has been given the trauma
of the victim's of "stalkers" (persons who obsessively surveil,
harass and, in some cases, kill targeted individuals for
assorted, unfathomable reasons). Movie stars that have been
stalked recurrently make the news. Stalking, as a problem, is in
fact becoming widespread, to a point where, in some States, the
activity has finally been specifically proscribed by law.

The individuals in contact with our Association are reporting the
same terrifying ranges of experiences as are now being reported
by the press on behalf of other victims stalkers. The only
difference in the cases reported to us is that the stalkers
operate in groups over extremely long periods of time, and (it
would appear) with the blessings of certain agencies of the U.S.
Government. The laws being passes to protect victims of stalkers
are clearly being selectively applied. We hope to put an end to
this situation; that is, in addition to achieving the objects
discussed above.

It should be noted that the FBI, though unwilling to intervene in
the cases described above recently intervened on a massive scale
to protect Joy Silverman, a Bush-appointed trustee of the J.F.
Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, from the ardent
"stalkings" of her estranged paramour, Sol Wachtler, Chief
Justice, Court of Appeals in the State of New York.(12)

Wachtler had apparently threatened to kidnap Silverman's daughter
if not paid $20,000. Since no kidnapping had occurred, the case
qualified merely as an attempted extortion, a question arises as
to why the New York State Police could not have handled this
investigation. Mr. Silverman resides in New York.

It would appear that the FBI devoted more than 100 agents and
technicians to the effort, resolving the case within
approximately 30 days. On November 7, 1992, the day of his
arrest, Wachtler ran a gauntlet of 80 FBI special agents on the
Long Island Expressway. Apparently the FBI does not have enough
to do, if staking out a lone stalker is their top priority. We
have to wonder, of course, if the FBI's massive response was
prompted by what was perceived to be Wachtler's usurpation of
governmental stalking prerogatives.

Mrs. Silverman's $300,000 donations to Republican Party causes
could be considered a basis for the FBI's solicitous concern for
her welfare. It would appear, under the circumstances, that the
"stalking victims" discussed above -- being by now
poverty-stricken -- should abandon all hope of FBI intervention
in their respective situations. FBI protection appears to have a
price tag, which not one of our contacts can afford.

Footnotes

(1) Peters, Edward, Torture, Basil Blackwell, Inc., New
York/London, 1985

(2) The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, OH, June 28, 1991, p.4-B
("Psychiatrist Testifies at mom's Hearing"); November 6, 1991,
(Woman Ruled Competent for Trial"); and December 21, 1991, p. 4-C
("Ruling Expected Monday on Sanity of Parma Mother/Woman says she
stabbed her 3 children to protect them").

(3) The Washington Post, June 1, 1991, p. C-1 ("Voices' Led to
Tragedy for 2 Men/Pentagon Suspect's Mother Says Institutions
Should Have Held Son") and December 14, 1991, p. D-3 ("Suspect in
Pentagon Killing Is Found Unfit to Stand Trial").

(4) The Washington Post, September 4, 1992, p. D-3 ("Freight
Train kills Woman Near Home in Silver Spring").

(5) Jane's Security and Co-In [Counter-Insurgency] Equipment,
(Surrey, UK, 1991-92), as a preliminary source, contains a number
of references to attache-case concealment devices, for use in
surveillance/communications operations. The electronic components
are built into the bottom interior of these cases. Obviously the
man just described could not have carried a "microcircuitried"
attache case aboard a U.S. airliner without first clearing
security. We were advised by a former CIA DDS (Security) employee
that credential-carrying members of U.S. Intelligence can bypass
airport security checks of their carry-on luggage.

(6) Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, October 15, 1986, p. 1-A ("U.S.
Used Humans for Radiation Guinea Pigs").

(7) See, for example, Weinstein, Harvey M., M.D., Psychiatry and
the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, American Psychiatric Press,
Washington, D.C., 1990; Marks, John, The Search for the
"Manchurian Candidate" The CIA and Mind Control, Times Books, New
York, 1979; Delgado, Jose M. R., M.D., Physical Control of the
Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Harper & Row, New York,
1969; and Hutchison, Michael, Megabrain: New Tools and Techniques
for Brain Growth and Mind Expansion, Ballantine Books, New York,
1986.

(8) According to a Vancouver Sun archivist, Hollywood Hospital,
Ltd. (a privately-owned institution), went out of business in
1975, two years after this woman's hospitalization and after
approximately 30 years of doing business. The event coincided
with findings by the U.S. Senate Church Committee concerning the
CIA's brainwashing experiments under MKULTRA. Our contact also
identified the Director of the Hollywood Hospital as Dr. Ross
MacLean -- information also confirmed by the Vancouver Sun.
Nothing in these records, copies of which are being obtained,
points to CIA involvement with the hospital. Perhaps a portion of
history has been overlooked. Cornell Medical Center's role in
MKULTRA is a matter of public record. (See, for example, Thomas,
Gordon, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of the CIA Mind
Control and Medical Abuse, Bantam Books, New York, 1989).

(9) The Roper Organization, Unusual Personal Experiences: An
Analysis of the Data from Three National Surveys, (Bigelow
Holding Corp., Las Vegas, NY, 1991. Contributors lending
"credibility" to this publication include John Mack and Budd
Hopkins.

(10) Defense Week, October 19, 1992, Vol. 13, No. 41, pp. I & II,
("Pentagon, State [Department] Collaborate on Counterterror
Gear").

(11) Op. cit., Weinstein, pp. 140-141.

(12) The Washington Post, November 10, 1992, p. A-1 ("An Unlikely
Suspect for Scandal/Top N.Y. Judge Accused of Breaking Law in
Secret Life").

There can never be any justification for torture. It creates an
escalation of violence in the internal affairs of states. It
spreads like a contagious disease from country to country. It has
lasting effects on the mental and physical health of the victim
and brutalizes the torturer. It is fundamental duty as human
beings to express what is surely the conscience of humanity and
to eradicate this evil.

[Amnesty International, February 1990, in the context of the U.S.
Government's continuing failure to ratify the U.N. Convention
Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment, dated December 10, 1984]
